Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Through Module Team Collaboration: A Case Study of Business English Teachers in China

Article Details

Peng Wu,, nan, da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, China
Shulin Yu, , Faculty of Education, University of Macau,

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 26 Issue 2024-01-02 00:00:00 (Published: 2017-04-01)

Abstract

Informed by literature on developing pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) through teacher collaboration, this study aims to investigate the trajectory of PCK development among business English teachers through module team collaboration in Chinese context. Drawing upon multiple sources of data including observation, semi-structured interview, and teaching materials from three case teachers, this study explores how PCK components were developed in one academic year when case teachers participated in module team collaborative activities. The findings show the individual differences among the three participants in their PCK development and reveal that two key PCK components—Knowledge of students’ understanding and Knowledge of instructional strategies have developed through teacher collaboration. This study suggests the collective inquiry in teacher collaboration.

Keywords: Pedagogical content knowledge Teacher collaboration EFL context Business English

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-017-0330-9
  References:

Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Through Module Team Collaboration: A Case Study of Business English Teachers in China

Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421–455.

Andrews, S. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12(2), 81–95.

Chen, B., & Wei, B. (2015). Examining chemistry teachers’ use of curriculum material: in view of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 260–272.

Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383–412.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Fickel, L. H. (2001). The high school department as a collective community: What teachers learn from their colleagues. Teacher Education, 14(2), 119–155.

Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. London: Routledge Falmer.

Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher College Press.

Hargreaves, A. (1995). Beyond collaboration: Critical teacher development in the post-modern age. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical discourses on teacher development (pp. 149–180). London: Cassell.

Hendryx, J. D. (2008). Experienced foreign and second language instructors’ pedagogical content knowledge and language play. Ph.D thesis, University of Washington.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education Technology, 19, 553–564.

Juang, Y.-Y., Liu, T.-C., & Chan, T.-W. (2008). Computer-supported teacher development of pedagogical content knowledge through developing school-based curriculum. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 149–170.

McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning community: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research—A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407.

Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

Rodrigues, S., Marks, A., & Steel, P. (2003). Developing science and ICT pedagogical content knowledge: A model of continuing professional Innovations. Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 386–394.

Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Jochems, W.M.G., & Zwaneveld, B. (2011). Teaching programming in secondary school: A pedagogical content knowledge perspective. Informatics in Education, 10(1), 73–88.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teacher PCK improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 885–897.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogue inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Wu, P. (2013). Examining pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for business English teaching: Concept and model. Polyglossia, 25, 83–94.

Wu, Y.-R. (2013). The construction of a teacher professional learning community. Education Review, 1, 54–56.

Wu, H.-D., & Badger, R. G. (2009). In a strange and uncharted land: ESP teachers’ strategies for dealing with unpredicted problems in subject matter during class. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 19–32.

Zhang, J., & Pang, N. S.-K. (2016). Exploring the characteristics of professional learning communities in China: A mixed-method study. Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 25(1), 11–21.

Zhang, H.-Y., & Wu, J.-M. (2008). The deconstruction and reconstruction of Teachers’ culture: From isolation to collaboration. Education Theory and Practice, 7, 48–51.

Zhang, H. L., & Zhang, J. F. (2011). On the primary and middle school teachers` cooperation over the past thirty years. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 13(4), 22–26.

  Cited by: