This study analyzes the transitivity processes in the inaugural speeches of Filipino presidents from 1899 to 2016. Using Halliday`s (1985) transitivity system model, this study aims to examine what process types are present in the inaugural speeches of these Filipino presidents, how these inaugural speeches differ in a diachronic scale, and how these processes are employed in the corpus. Findings revealed that all processes were evident in the inaugural speeches of the Filipino presidents, while themes. It was further revealed that among these process types, the material process was the most frequently used by the Filipino presidents in presenting solutions to current problems, depicting a new government under their administration, and pertaining to God as divine providence in running the government. It was followed by the relational process, which was employed in explaining concepts, accentuating the prime responsibility of the government and the people, and describing the challenges the government faces; while the mental process was mainly used by the Filipino presidents in expressing their dispositions and political beliefs, manifesting their desire for the welfare of people, and inspiring the public to be part of nation-building. This study mainly puts forward the notion that transitivity processes play a distinct role in the inaugural speeches of Filipino presidents in persuading and informing the public as regards their ideologies and commitments.
Keywords: Inaugural speeches, language and politics, Philippine presidents, political discourse, transitivity analysisExploring character delineation: A transitivity analysis of O. Henry’s “A Retrieved Reformation”
Adjei. A.. Ewusi-Mensah, L., (2016). Transitivity in Kufour’s 2008 farewell speech to the Ghanaian parliament. British Journal of English Linguistics, 4(1), 36-49.
Adjei, A., Ewusi-Mensah, L., & Okoh, H. (2015). Transitivity in political discourse: A study of the major process types in the 2009 State-of-the-Nation Address in Ghana. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 6, 23-32.
Aitchison, J. (2001). Language change: Progress or decay? (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Al-Haq, F., & Al-Sleibi, N. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of three speeches of .LQJ $EGXOODK ,, 86 KLPD )RUHLJQ Language, 13(5), 317-332. https://doi. org/10.17265/1539-8080/2015.05.001 Al-Majali, W. (2015). Discourse analysis of the political speeches of the ousted Arab presidents during the Arab Spring Revolution using Halliday and Hasan’s framework of cohesion. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(14), 96-109. https://www.iiste. org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/22463.
Alvaro, R. (2013). The linguistic path of “Romance”: A systemic-functional analysis and gender comparison of songs of the 1950s and the 2000s. Investigaciones Feministas, 3, 7-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_INFE.2012.v3.41132.
Anastassov, V. (2018). Power and truth in political discourse: Language and ideological narratives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ashild, N. (2007). Prototypical transitivity. John Benjamins.
Balog, P. (2019). Transitivity analysis of selected privilege speeches of Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 7, 43-65. https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/volume/transitivity-analysis-of-selected-privilege-speeches-of-senator-miriam-defensor-santiago-pp-43-65/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. in Psychology, 3(2). 77-101. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735
Bustam, M. (2011). Analyzing clauses by Halliday’s transitivity system. Jurnal LLMU Sastra,6(1), 22-34. http://jis.fs.unikom.ac.id/jurnal/analyzing-clause-by.v
Chemssi, Y. (2015 October 22). Keeping up with our language. Synchronic vs. diachronic linguistics. Terminology Coordination. https://termcoord.eu/2015/10/keeping-up-with our-language-synchronic-vs-diachronic-linguistics/
Cheng, M. (2006). Constructing a new political spectacle: Tactics of Chen Shui-bian’s 2000
and 2004 inaugural speeches. Discourse and Society. 17(5), 583-608. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F0957926506066297
Chung, C.J., & Park, H.W. (2010). Textual analysis of a political message: The inaugural addresses of two Korean presidents. Social Science Information. 49(2), 215-239.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0539018409359370
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Dunmire, P. (2012). Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the
Politics of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 735-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121-138). Sage Publications.Rappler.
Gavilan, J. (2016, July 15). The many firsts of president-elect Duterte. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/132862-rodrigo-duterte-president-first.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K (19940. Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K,. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K,. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Harbi, S., Abdul Jabar, M.S., Md. Nor, & Muhammad Isa, N. (2019). ‘Hey, Jude! I Wanna Hold Your Hand’: Transitivity process analysis on popular songs by The Beatles. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v9.301.
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251-299. http://latina.phil2.uni-freiburg.de/raible/Lehre/2006/Materialien/Hopper_Thompson.pdf
Kondowe, W.( 2014). Presidents and ideologies: An transitivity analysis of Bingu wa Mutharika’s inaugural address. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.16.
Landa, E. (2016). (Master’s dissertation). Universidad Complutense Madrid. EPrints Complutense. https://eprints.ucm.es/46524/
Liu, F. (2012). Genre analysis of American presidential inaugural speech. , 2(11), 2407-2411. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.11.2407-2411.
Miranti, I. (2014). Transitivity Analysis in the Construction of Newspapers Ideology: A comparative Study on the New York Times and the Washington Times’ Editorials (Undergraduate thesis). Dian Nuswantoro University Semarang. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Transitivity-Analysis-in-the-Construction-of-A-on-Miranti/5b9319949a3f845ab603aa801203d37b75174d2f
Nery, J. (2013). Is there, in fact, a Fifth Philippine Republic? Inquirer. https://opinion.
Nordquist, R. (2019a, July 17). Overview of systemic functional linguistics. https://www.thoughtco.com/systemic-functional-linguistics-1692022
Nordquist, R. (2019b, July 07). Definition and examples of diachronic linguistics. https://www.thoughtco.com/diachronic-linguistics-term-1690385
Ong’onda, N. (2016). Transitivity analysis of newspaper headlines on terrorism attack in International Journal of Humanities , 6(9), 77-85. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_7_July_2016/8.pdf
Ragsdale, L. (1984). The politics of presidential speechmaking, 1949-1980. American , 78(4), 971-984. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955802.
Rozas, V. (2007). A usage-based approach to prototypical transitivity. In N. Delbecque, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), On interpreting construction schemas. From action and motion to transitivity and causality (pp. 17-38). DeGruyter Mouton.
Rush, K. (2017). Influences of the Presidential Inaugural Address on Audience Perceptions of Candidate Image and the State of the Nation (Doctoral dissertation). Portland State University. . https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1ab4/71bf334569e8b9a0a6d2dbcdd56995e0c6d4.pdf
Salvaleon, R. (2019). A promise of change: A transitivity analysis of Rodrigo Duterte’s State of the Nation addresses. , 6(2), 40-53. https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/apherj/article/view/1395.
Sharndama, E. (2015). Political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of President Muhammadu Buhari’s inaugural speech. European Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 3(3), 12-24. http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Political-Discourse-A-Critical-Discourse-Analysis-of-President-Muhammadu-Buhari---sinaugural-Speech.pdf.
Song, Z. (2013). Transitivity analysis of “A Rose for Emily”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2291-2295. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2291-2295
Subedi, D. (2016). Explanatory sequential mixed method design as the third research community of knowledge. American Journal of Education Research, 4(7), 570-577. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-7-10
Szczepanski, K. (2019 August 14). Biography of Ferdinand Marcos, dictator of the Philippines. ThoughtCo.https://www.thoughtco.com/ferdinand-marcos-195676.
The Official Gazette, (n.d). Evolution of the Philippines Constitution. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/constitution-day
The Official Gazette, (n.d). Executive branch of government. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/section/historical-papers
Valeriano, L.R., & Lintao, R.B. (2016). Functional stylistic analysis: Transitivity in Philippine Daily Inquirer and Asian Journal of English , 4, 54-70. https://ajels.ust.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/4-Functional-stylistic-analysis-Transitivity-in-Philippine-Daily-Inquirer.pdf
Wang, J. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama speeches. Journal of Language , 1(3), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261.
Yujie, Z., & Fengjie, L. (2018). Transitivity analysis of American President Donald Trump’s inaugural address. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 6(2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20180602.1
Yuqiong, Z., & Fengjie, L. (2018). Transitivity analysis of David Cameron’s speech in retaining Scotland. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(3), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180603.13
Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clintons’ and Donald Trump’s first television debate. Literature, 6(7). 65-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.65