The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between fourth and eighth grade students’ self-concept and achievement in mathematics and science within one educational system based on the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) model. The samples were from the data of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2011, and hierarchical linear modeling was used to differentiate the effects of the student-level and school-level achievement on student self-concept of learning in Taiwan. The results indicated that the self-concept of students of both grade levels is positively associated with individual achievement in mathematics and science. However, there is generally a statistically significant and negative correlation between student self-concept and school mean achievement. At the same time, the results also showed that the correlation was stronger for the eighth than for the fourth grade students, and for mathematics than for science. The findings of this study document the different degree of BFLPE on students of different grades and on different academic subjects.
Keywords: TIMSS BFLPE HLM Self-concept of learning science Self-concept of learning mathematicsBempechat, J., Jimenez, N. V., & Boulay, B. A. (2002). Cultural-cognitive issues in academic achievement: New directions for cross-national research. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 117–150). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474–481.
Chen, S.-F., Lin, C.-Y., Wang, J.-R., Lin, S.-W., & Kao, H.-L. (2012). A cross-grade comparison to examine the context effect on the relationships among family resources, school climate, learning participation, science attitude, and science achievement based on TIMSS 2003 in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2089–2106.
Chiu, M.-S. (2012). The internal/external frame of reference model, big-fish-little-pond effect, and combined model for mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 87–107.
Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(2), 367–380.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales: The reference-group problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.
Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Mayseless, O. (1990). Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 195–208.
Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355–365.
Lee, J. W., Jones, P., Mineyama, Y., & Zhang, X. E. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 25(4), 295–306.
Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liem, G. A. D., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., McInerney, D. M., & Yeung, A. S. (2013). The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 326–370.
Liou, P.-Y. (under review) Examining the big-fish-little-pond effect on students’ self-concept of learning science in Taiwan based on the TIMSS databases.
Marsh, H. W. (1984a). Self-concept, social comparison and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 799–806.
Marsh, H. W. (1984b). Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results. Australian Journal of Education, 28, 165–181.
Marsh, H. W. (1987a). The hierarchical structure of self-concept and the application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 17–39.
Marsh, H. W. (1987b). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280–295.
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 41–54.
Marsh, H. W. (1991). Failure of high ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445–480.
Marsh, H.W. (1992). Self description questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept. A test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, NSW: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.
Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R. G., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285–319.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big-fish-little-pond effect. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. II, pp. 83–123). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.
Marsh, H. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept: An application of multilevel modeling. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65–87.
Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K.-T., O’Mara, A. J., et al. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319–350.
Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125.
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 631–669.
Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691–720.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (with Olson, J. F., Erberber, E., Preuschoff, C., & Galia, J.). (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Ministry of Education (Taiwan). (2007). General guidelines of grade 1-9 curriculum: Science and technology. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Mohammadpour, E. (2012). Factors accounting for mathematics achievement of Singaporean English eighth-graders. The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 21(3), 507–518.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Nagengast, B., & Marsh, H. W. (2011). The negative effect of school-average ability on science self-concept in the UK, the UK countries and the world: the big-fish-little-pond effect for PISA 2006. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 629–656.
Nagengast, B., & Marsh, H. W. (2012). Big fish in little ponds aspire more: Mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1033–1053.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: OECD.
Olsen, R. V., Prenzel, M., & Martin, R. (2011). Interest in science: A many-faceted picture painted by data from the OECD PISA study. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 1–6.
Papanastasiou, E. C., & Zembylas, M. (2004). Differential effects of science attitudes and science achievement in Australia, Cyprus, and the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 259–280.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2005). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
Rinn, A. N., McQueen, K. S., Clark, G. L., & Rumsey, J. L. (2008). Gender differences in gifted adolescent’s math/verbal self-concepts and math/verbal achievement: Implications for the STEM fields. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(1), 34–53.
Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151.
Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403–419.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J., & Stanton, G. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.
Stankov, L. (2010). Unforgiving Confucian culture: A breeding ground for high academic achievement, test anxiety and self-doubt? Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 555–563.
Whang, P. A., & Hancock, G. R. (1994). Motivation and mathematics achievement: Comparison between Asian American and non-Asian students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 302–322.
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2004). Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 331–346.
Wood, J. V. (1996). What is social comparison and how should we study it? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(5), 520–537.
Wu, M. L. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 114–128.
Zeng, K. (1999). Dragon gate: Comparative examinations and their consequences. London: Casell.