Using Tasks and Repair Practices in the Malaysian L2 Classroom

Article Details

Lilliati Ismail, Arshad Abd. Samad, nan, SAM Unwanus Saadah, Banting, Selangor, Malaysia

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 23 Issue 3 (Published: 2014-09-01)

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of using tasks in the Malaysian classroom to facilitate second language (L2) learning, particularly amongst Form 6 (18-year-old) students in the Malaysian secondary school system. These students had undergone 6 years of primary education and 5 years of secondary education in Malaysian public schools. They obtained average to excellent results in the standardized national public school examination when they were in Form 5 to qualify for Form 6 education, which is equivalent to a pre-university programme. The current study carried out classroom-based research using two task types of differing reasoning demands and investigated the main and interaction effects of task reasoning demand (TRD) and learner repair practices on the successful resolution of errors. Using a repeated-measures counterbalancing design with two consensus tasks of differing levels of reasoning demands (+TRD and −TRD), the study investigated how learners recognise gaps in their language use, draw attention to these gaps through negotiation of form and repair practices and, consequently, provide modified output. The results show that repair practices and level of reasoning demand have significant effects on successful repair outcomes. The result could imply the need to create awareness about learner repair practices during learner–learner interactions as they could potentially lead to L2 development.

Keywords: Consensus task Task reasoning demand Negotiation of form Repair practices

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-013-0124-7
  References:

Allwright, R. L., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brindley, G. (1987). Factors affecting task difficulty. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Guidelines for the development of curriculum resources. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.

Calve, P. (1992). Corriger ou ne pas corriger, la n’est pas la question. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 48, 458–471.

Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Chung, I.-F., & Huang, Y.-C. (2009). The implementation of Communicative language teaching: An investigation of students’ viewpoints. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 67–78.

de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529–555.

Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn. Rowley MA: Newbury House.

Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193–220.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.

Gass, S. M. & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302.

Gilabert, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. Unpublished Doctoral, Dissertation, The University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on sef-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215–240.

Gilabert, R., Baron, J., & Llanes, M. (2009). Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners’ interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 3676–3695.

Ismail, L., Samad, A. A., Wong, B. E., & Noordin, N. (2012). The effects of task reasoning demand and dyadic versus individual task conditions on learner affective factors in the ESL classroom. Life Science Journal, 9(3), 2162–2168.

Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130.

Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49(2), 303–342.

Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). Factors affecting second language learning. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context. London: Routledge.

Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54(1), 153–188.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ministry of Education. (2000). Sukatan Pelajaran Kurikulum Besepadu Sekolah Menengah Bahasa Inggeris. Malaysia: Curriculum Development Centre, Ministry of Education.

Nabei, T. (1996). Dictogloss: Is it an effective language learning task? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 12(1), 59–74.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for a communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Revesz, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437–470.

Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45(1), 99–140.

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell.

Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1–32.

Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 193–213.

Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 362–382.

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling Second Language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy. New York: Routledge.

  Cited by:
     None...