Understanding the Twists and Turns of Academic Deanship: A Phenomenology of Filipino Medical Technology Deans’ Struggles as Organizational Managers

Article Details

Allan B. de Guzman,, nan, The Graduate School, College of Nursing, College of Education, Research Cluster on Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
Ma. Frieda Z. Hapan, , The Graduate School, College of Nursing, College of Education, Research Cluster on Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 23 Issue 2 (Published: 2014-06-01)

Abstract

Capitalizing on the power of qualitative approach in drawing out the multiple layers of meaning entrenched in subjective realities, this phenomenological inquiry described the lived experiences of 12 Filipino medical technology deans, as they face their struggles in managing their organization. An in-depth, semi-structured one-on-one interview which lasted for 1–2 h was conducted. Field texts were transcribed and analyzed using a repertory grid and through constant comparative analyses, an interesting model and a set of conceptual themes about deanship struggles emerged. The 3-D model of deanship struggles, which is a product of the sharing of the respondents, provides a panorama of how Filipino medical technology dean`s balance (i) superiority and relationality; (ii) rule and role; (iii) obligation and allocation; (iv) personal and professional life; and (v) scholarship and leadership in an educational milieu of (i) prudence; (ii) transparency; (iii) justice; (iv) productivity; and (v) excellence using the gifts of (i) understanding; (ii) flexibility; (iii) bargaining; (iv) hard work; and (v) risk taking. Findings in this paper provide a valuable lens through which the Filipino medical technology deans’ mindset as organizational managers could be viewed and understood

Keywords: Analytical mindset Deanship Medical technology Filipino

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-013-0102-0
  References:

Allen-Meares, P. (2003). Serving as dean: A public university perspective. New Directions for Higher Education (pp. 83–88). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.

Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Power and conflict in the university: Research in the sociology of complex organizations. New York: Wiley.

Beach, R., Muhlemann, A. P., Price, D. H. R., Paterson, A., & Sharp, J. A. (2000). A review of manufacturing flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(1), 41–57.

Bernthal, P., & Wellins, R. (2006). Trends in leader development and succession. Human Resource Planning, 29(3), 31–40.

Boroditsky, L., Neville, H., Karns, C., Markman, A.B. & Spivey, M.J. (2010). Flux: Fundamental or frivolous? In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Bragg, D. D. (2000). Preparing community college deans to lead change. New Directions for Community Colleges, Spring 2000(109), 75–85.

Bratton, J., Grint, K., & Nelson, D. L. (2005). Organizational Leadership. Mason: South-Western.

Bray, N. J. (2008). Proscriptive norms for academic deans: Comparing faculty expectations across institutional and disciplinary boundaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 692–721.

Bray, N. J. (2010). The deanship and its faculty interpreters: Do mertonian norms of science translate into norms for administration? The Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 284–316.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Collins, R. S., Cordon, C., & Julien, D. (1998). An empirical test of the rigid flexibility model. Journal of Operations Management, 16(2), 133–146.

Cullen, L., Greiner, J., Greiner, J., Bombei, C., & Comried, L. (2004). Excellence in evidence-based practice: Organizational units and exemplars. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 17(2), 127–142.

Deak, G. O. (2004). The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 31(1), 271–327.

DeConinck, J. B. (2010). The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees’ level of trust. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1349–1355.

Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–236.

Del Favero, M. (2003). Faculty-administrator relationships as integral to high-performing governance systems: New frameworks for study. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(1), 902–922.

Del Favero, M. (2006). Disciplinary variations in preparation for the academic dean role. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(3), 277–292.

Dill, W. R. (1980). The deanship: An unstable craft. In D. E. Griffiths & D. J. McCarty (Eds.), The dilemma of the deanship (pp. 261–284). Danville IL: Interstate.

Dreyer, B., & Grønhaug, K. (2004). Uncertainty, flexibility, and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 484–494.

Dunning, G., James, C., & Jones, N. (2005). Splitting and projections at work in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 244–257.

Enomoto, E., & Matsuoka, J. (2007). Becoming a dean: Selection and socialization processes of an academic leader. Journal of Research in Leadership Education, 2(3), 2–30.

Fagin, C. M. (1997). The leadership role of a dean. New Directions for Higher Education, Summer, 97(8), 95–99.

Gaddis, B., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Failure feedback as an affective event: influences of leader effect on subordinate attitudes and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 663–686.

Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 39(4), 395–410.

Gerwin, D. (1983). Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Science, 39(4), 395–410.

Gmelch, W. H. (2000). Leadership succession: How new deans take charge and learn the job. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 68–87.

Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., & Sarros, J. C. (1999). The academic dean: An imperiled species searching for balance. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 717–740.

Gosling, J., & Mintzberg, H. (2003). The five minds of a manager. Harvard Business Review, 81(11), 54–63.

Guangling, W. (2011). The study on the relationship between employees’ sense of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior in private enterprises. Energy Procedia, 5(1), 2030–2034.

Gupta, Y. P., & Somers, T. M. (1996). Business strategy, manufacturing flexibility, and organizational performance relationships: A path analysis approach. Production and Operations Management, 5(3), 204–233.

Guskin, A. E. (1996). Facing the future. Change, 28(4), 26–38.

Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190–200.

Jafari, P., & Bidarian, S. (2012). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(1), 1815–1820.

Johnson, J. F. (2009). Balancing professional and home life. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 41–49.

Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. (2006). When organizational justice and self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 175–201.

Klimoski, R. (2007). A dean’s life. BizEd, 6(4), 38–43.

Koning, L., Steinel, W., van Beest, & van Dijk, E. (2011). Power and deception in ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 35–42.

Lamude, K. G., & Scudder, J. (2000). Managers’ tactics of influence: Perceptions of regular and temporary employees. Psychological Reports, 87(2), 677–680.

Mackenzie, K. D. (1998). A framework for managing risky situations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6(1), 5–31.

Mc Daniel, T. R. (1978). On the dean and his office: Reflections of a department chairman. Peabody Journal of Education, 55(4), 358–363.

McDade, S.A (1988). Higher education leadership: Enhancing skills through professional development. George Washington University, Graduate School of Education & Human Development. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.

Milliken, F. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state, effect and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143.

Montez, J. M., Wolverton, M., & Gmelch, W. H. (2002). The roles and challenges of Deans. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 241–266.

Morgan, M. (2003). The role of prudence in education. Educational Theory, 53(2), 173–183.

Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, M. S. (1991). Leaders as creators: Leader performance and problem solving ill-defined domains. Leadership Quarterly, 2(40), 289–315.

Nadiri, H., & Tanova, C. (2010). An investigation of the role of justice in turn-over intentions, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 33–41.

Nir, A. E. (2003). School-based management and the role conflict of the school superintendent. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(5), 547–564.

Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2010). The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 350–364.

Olkkonnen, M. E., & Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 202–215.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

Roaden, A. L. (1970). The college deanship: A new middle management in college education. Theory into Practice, 9(4), 272–276.

Robillard, D. (2000). Toward a definition of deaning. In D. Robillard Jr (Ed.), Dimensions of managing academic affairs in the community college. New Directions for Community Colleges, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sawhney, R. (2006). Interplay between uncertainty and flexibility across the value-chain: Towards a transformation model of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 476–493.

Seagren, A. T., Wheeler, D. W., Creswell, J. W., Miller, M. T., & VanHorn-Grassmeyer., K. (1994). Academic Leadership in Community Colleges. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Spring, J. (2008). Research on globalization and education. Review of Educational Research, 78(5), 330–363.

Swamidass, P. M., & Newell, W. T. (1987). Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty, and performance: a path analytical model. Management Science, 33(4), 509–524.

Tay, B., Özkan, D., & Tay, B. A. (2009). The effect of academic risk-taking levels on the problem solving ability of gifted students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1099–1104.

Thacker, R. A., & Stoner, J. (2012). Supervisors’ instrumental and emotional influences on subordinate help-seeking behaviour: an exploratory study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(1), 40–41.

Wild, L. L., Ebbers, L. H., Shelley, M. C., & Gmelch, W. H. (2003). Stress factors and community college deans: The stresses of their role identified. Community College Review, 31(3), 1–23.

Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Montez, J., & Nies, C. T. (2001). The changing nature of academic deanship. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(1), 27–40.

Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., & Gmelch, W. H. (1999). The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(1), 80–106.

Wong, Y. T., Ngo, H. Y., & Wong, C. S. (2006). Perceived organizational justice, trust and OCB: A study of Chinese workers in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises. Journal of World Business, 41(4), 344–355.

  Cited by:
     None...