The Representation of Internationalization in Higher Education in the Philippines: The Case of the University Newsletter

Article Details

Paolo Nino Valdez,, nan, Philippines
Kate Steel, , Department of English and Applied Linguistics, De La Salle University, Manila,

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 23 Issue 1 (Published: 2014-03-01)

Abstract

This study employs a critical discourse analytic approach in drawing out the thematic formulations of the discourses of internationalization in higher education from issues of a university newsletter from a span of 5 years (2005–2010). Specifically, it examines the representation of the institution with regard to discourses of internationalization through an analysis of the ideational metafunctions manifested in the texts’ headlines. Conducting an analysis of aspects such as transitivity, nominalization/passivization, lexis, and the representation of social actors intends to reveal the salient qualities of the discourse of internationalization embedded in these headlines.

Keywords: Internationalization Critical discourse analysis Marketization of higher education

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-013-0086-9
  References:

Altbach, P. & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11 (3–4), 290–305.

Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres—the student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9 (6), 723–742.

Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Bhatia, V.K. (2005) ‘Generic patterns in promotional discourse’, In H. Halmari & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (pp. 213–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bloomaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chan, W. & Dimmock, C. (2008). The internationalization of universities: Globalist, internationalist and translocalist models. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 184–204.

Connell, I. & Galasinski, D. (1998). Academic mission statements: An exercise in negotiation. Discourse and Society, 9(4), 457–479.

Crichton, J. (2010). The discourse of commercialization: A multidisciplinary perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133–168.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.

Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

James, E. (1991). Private higher education. Higher Education, 21, 189–206.

King, R. (2009). Governing universities globally: Organizations, regulation and ranking. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches and rationale. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.

Marginson, S. (2007): Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 131–142.

Osman, H. (2008). Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: A genre perspective, Discourse and Communication, 2(1), 57–77.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

  Cited by:
     None...