Engaging in research helps teachers improve their own classroom practices, thereby increasing the chance to foster an engaging classroom environment where fresh materials and strategies are used. However, there remains to be some form of the dichotomy between teaching and research, even in the context of universities. What little research is available in the ASEAN and Philippine contexts regarding teachers’ research engagement reports perennial problems such as lack of time, heavy workload, and lack of research skills. This study aimed to add to the literature in the Philippine English language teaching (ELT) context by uncovering university teachers’ perceptions on the benefits of and challenges in doing research, as well as their own research practices and the academic environment they are in. A group of 22 English language teachers participated in semi-structured online interviews. The thematic analysis of interview data revealed that both personal and professional considerations permeated the issues on benefits, challenges, and practices, corroborating or contradicting previous studies. The participants likewise highlighted enabling and hindering factors concerning research engagements in their own university context and even proffered points for improvement. The study concludes that many teachers have engaged and want to engage in research, but variations can be seen in their level of engagement, exposure to research, and reasons for engaging in such endeavor.
Keywords: English language teaching (ELT), teacher professional development, teacher research, teachers’ research practicesAdo, K. (2013). Action research: Professional development to help support and retain early career teachers. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 131-–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.789701
Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research?. TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 61-–81. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v24i2.139
Anwaruddin, S. M. (2019). Engagement with research, teacher learning and educational leadership: Towards an interpretive-ecological approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(2), 175-–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1394495
Ayala, C. O., & Garcia, B. (2013). Research productivity and utilization in higher education institutions in the CALABARZON Region. MSEUF Research Studies, 15(1), 2-–15.
Barfield, A. (2016). Collaboration. ELT Journal, 70(2), 222-–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv074
Behrstock-Sherratt, E., Drill, K., & Miller, S. (2011). Is the supply in demand? Exploring how, when, and why teachers use research. Learning Point Associates.
Biruk, H. E. (2013). The Practice and Challenges in Conducting Action Research: The case of Sululta Secondary School (Unpublished mMaster’s thesis). Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Borg, S. (2014). Teacher research for professional development. In G. Pickering, & P. Gunashekar (Eds.), Innovation in English language teacher education: (pp.23-28). Selected papers from the fourth International Teacher Educator Conference, Hyderabad, India (pp.23–28). https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/continuing-professional-development/cpd- teacher-trainers/innovation-english-language-teacher-education
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brennan, L., Cusack, T., Delahunt, E., Kuznesof, S., & Donnelly, S. (2019). Academics’ conceptualisations of the research-teaching nexus in a research-intensive Irish university: A dynamic framework for growth & development. Learning and Instruction, 60, 301-–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.005
Bughio, F. A. (2015). Issues and challenges in doing action research in public sector universities, Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 3(1), 86-–95.
Burns, A., & Kurtoglu-Hooton, N. (2014). Implementing action research in the modern language classroom. Scottish Languages Review, 27, 21-–28.
Cain, T. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with published research: Addressing the knowledge problem. The Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 488-–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1020820
Cain, T., & Harris, R. (2013). Teachers’ action research in a culture of performativity. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 343-–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.815039
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2007). Everything’s ethics: Practitioner inquiry and university culture. A. Campbell, & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.),. An ethical approach to practitioner research (pp. 24-–41). Routledge.
Commission on Higher Education. (2012). Policy-standard to enhance quality assurance (QA) in Philippine higher education through an outcomes-based and typology-based QA. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.46-s2012.pdf
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2019). State universities and colleges number of faculty by program level: AY 2018-–19. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019-SUCs-Faculty-by-Highest-Degree-Attained.pdf
Cordingley, P. (2008). Research and evidence-informed practice: Focusing on practice and practitioners. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 37-–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640801889964
Crookes, G., & Arakaki, L. (1999). Teaching idea sources and work conditions in an ESL program. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 15-–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.1999.tb00151.x
Dehghan, F., & Sahragard, R. (2015): Iranian EFL teachers’ views on action research and its application in their classrooms: A case study. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 4(1), 39-–52.
Department of Education. (DepEd2016). Department Order No. 39, series of 2016.: Adoption of the Basic Education Research Agenda.
Dikilitaş, K., & Comoglu, I. (2020). Pre-service English teachers’ reflective engagement with stories of exploratory action research. European Journal of Teacher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1795123
Ellis, N., & Loughland, T. (2016). The challenges of practitioner research: A comparative study of Singapore and NSW. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 122-–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.8
Fareh, S., & Saeed, A.T. (2011). The teacher is a researcher in the context of language teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 153-–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.066
Feamster, N. (2013). The relationship between teaching and research. How to do great research: Grad school survival advice from Nick Feamster and Alex Gray. https://greatresearch.org/2013/11/01/the-relationship-between-teaching-and-research/
Firth, J. (2016). Research engagement for the school teacher and its role in the education community. Education in the North, 23(2), 161-–166.
Grima-Farrell, C. (2017). What matters in a research to practice cycle? Teachers as researchers. Springer.
Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 151-–163. http://www.iier.org.au/iier23/hine.html
Hong, C. E., & Lawrence, S. A. (2011). Action research in teacher education: Classroom inquiry, reflection, and data-driven decision making. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 4(2), 1-–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1134554.pdf
Kutlay, N. (2012). A survey of English language teachers’ view of research. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 188-–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.055
Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2-–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3001
Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research. Sage.
Li, Y., Li, D., Yang, W., & Li, H. (2020). Negotiating the teaching-research nexus: A case of classroom teaching in an MEd program. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 181-–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00150-3
Mahani, S., & Molki, A. (2012). Enhancing the quality of teaching and learning through action research. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(3), 209-–215. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i3.7086
Marsden, E., & Kasprowicz, R. (2017). Foreign language educators’ exposure to research: Reported experiences, exposure via citations, and a proposal for action. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 613-–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12426
Morales, M. P. E. (2016). Participatory Action rResearch (PAR) cum Action Research (AR) in teacher professional development: A literature review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1), 156-–165.
Norasmah, O., & Chia, S.Y. (2016). The challenges of action research implementation in Malaysian schools. Pertanika Journals Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(1), 43-–52.
Olenick, M., Flowers, M., Maltseva, T., & Diez-Sampedro, A. (2019). Research in academia: Creating and maintaining high performance research teams. Nursing Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8423460
Procter, R. (2015). Teachers and school research practices: The gaps between the values and practices of teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 41(5), 1-–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1105535
Rankin, J., & Becker, F. (2006). Does reading the research make a difference? A case study of teacher growth in FL German. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 353-–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00429.x
Renandya, W. A. (2014). Choosing the right international journal in TESOL and applied linguistics. ELTWO, 6, 1-–17. ELTWorldOnline.com. Retrieved from http://blog.nus.edu.sg/eltwo/?p=4426
Scimago. (2019). Scimago journal and country rank. https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?region=Asiatic%20Region
Simms, M. (2013). A teacher-educator uses action research to develop culturally conscious curriculum planners. Democracy & Education, 21(2). Article 3. http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol21/Iss2/3
Tayeb, O. (2016). Roadmap to become a world-class university. In O. Tayeb, A. Zahed, & J. Ritzen (Eds.), Becoming a world-class university (pp. 1-–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26380-9_1
Ulla, M. B. (2018). Benefits and challenges of doing research: Experiences from Philippine public school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 797-–810. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/ulla.pdf
Ulla, M. B., Barrera, K. B., & Acompanado, M. M. (2017). Philippine classroom teachers as researchers: Teachers’ perceptions, motivations, and challenges. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 52-–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.4
Vecaldo, R., Asuncion, J. E., & Ulla, M. (2019): From writing to presenting and publishing research articles: Experiences of Philippine education faculty-researchers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 81, 147-–164.
Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2015). Factors leading to limited faculty publications in Philippine higher education institutions. International Forum, 18(2), 121-–141.
Walkington, H., Stewart, K. A., Hall, E. E., Ackley, E., & Shanahan, J. O. (2020). Salient practices of award-winning undergraduate research mentors — balancing freedom and control to achieve excellence. Studies in Higher Education, 45(7), 1519-–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637838
Wiggins, K. (2015). Teachers work more overtime than any other professionals, analysis finds. TES. https://www.tes.com/news/teachers-work-more-overtime-any-other-professionals-analysis-finds
Zhou, J. (2012). Problems teachers face when doing action research and finding possible solutions. Chinese Education & Society, 45(4), 68-–80. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450405