Considering the Responsiveness, Accountability and Transparency Implications of Hybrid Organization in Local Governance: A Comparison of Public Service Provision Approaches in Myanmar and Thailand

Article Details

Grichawat Lowatchari, grichawat@kku.ac.th, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Japan
Charles David Crumpton, , Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Saw Khine Thet Tun, grichawat@kku.ac.th, University of Maryland at College Park, USA
Peerasit Kumnuansilpa, , Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Social Science Review
Volume 21 Issue 2 (Published: 2021-06-01)

Abstract

Urban areas around the world face challenges in public service production and provision to respond to complex expectations of their diverse publics. In response to these problems, organizationally complex solutions that involve inter-sectoral collaboration and cooperation among public, private for-profit, and nonprofit organizations are frequently “engineered” to create hybrid-organizational arrangements. The current article is premised on a prior assessment that there has been an inadequate application of organizational variables to understand how these organizationally complex forms of local governance emerge and operate. It uses its hybrid organization model in descriptive and analytic assessments of two organizationally complex local public service approaches in urban settings of Southeast Asia. For descriptive purposes, the hybrid approach assists in understanding why and how organizationally complex arrangements emerge in urban governance. For analytic purposes, it considers the consequentiality of these arrangements, particularly in terms of concerns raised by Stoker regarding the challenges that organizational complexity poses to the good governance dimensions of responsiveness, accountability, and transparency. The study finds that hybrid organizational approaches can contribute to good governance in urban areas. It also asserts the importance of assessing contextual factors in making inter-local comparisons in terms of good governance impacts.

Keywords: Local governance, good governance, hybrid organization, public service, Southeast Asia

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/publishing-house/journals/apssr/volume-21-number-2/#1626922777612-90de166c-5b27
  References:

Bevir, M. (Ed.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of local governance. SAGE Publications.

Chandler, R. C., & J. C. Plano, J. C. (1988). The public administration dictionary. ABC-Clio.

CH7 News. (2017). Yìeow kàao 7 sĕe: kŏn gàen smart city [Channel 7 News: Khon Kaen smart city]. Channel 7. http://news.ch7.com/detail/258697

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Crumpton, C. D. (2008). Organizational complexity in American local governance: Deploying an organizational perspective in concept and analytic framework development (Order No. 3343761). [Doctoral dissertation, Portland State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt. J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J.V. (2003). The new public service: An approach to reform, International Review of Public Administration, 8(1),3-10, https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2003.10805013

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2011). The new public service: sServing, not steering. M.E. Sharp.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service was revisited. Public Administration reviewReview, 75(5), 664-–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347

Ekpe, A. N. (2008). Effective management of socio-political conflicts in Akwa-Ibom state: Chief Godswill a pabio’s effort. The Public Administration, 2(2), 63-–70.

Gibson, R. (2011). A primer on collaborative multi-level governance. St. John’s, NF, Canada: Department of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland. www.cdnregdeve.ruralresilience.ca

Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance -– authority, steering and democracy (pp.13-–30). Oxford University Press.

Institute on Governance. (2002). Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century, The Fifth World Parks Congress.

Kim, P. O., Haligan, Cho, J. N., Oh, C. H., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2005). Toward participatory and transparent governance: Report on the sixth global forum on reinventing government. Public Administration Review, 65(6), 646-–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00494.x

Koppell, J. G. S. (2003). The politics of quasi-government: Hybrid organizations and the dynamics of bureaucratic control. Cambridge University Press.

Laslo, D., & Judd, D. R. (2006). Building civic capacity through an elastic local state: The case of St. Louis. Review of Policy Research, 23(6), 1235-–1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00253.x

Lowatcharin, G., & Crumpton, C. D. (2019). Local governance complexity in urban regions: Hybrid organization as an alternative explanation [Monograph]. College of Local Administration, Khon Kaen University.

Lowatcharin, G., Crumpton, C. D., & Pacharoen, S. (2019). Intergovernmental relations in a world of governance: A consideration of international experiences, challenges, and new directions. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 19(4), 44-–55.

NewsNBT THAILAND. (2018). Râyng plàk dan kŏn gàen sòo meuang àt-chà-rí-yá wan têe 27 préut-sà-jì-gaa-yon 2561 kàao kâm [Pushing Khon Kaen towards smart city- November 27, 2018 Evening News]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6Q5RKl9HyA.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1997). Managing across levels of government part one: Overview. OECD Publishing.

Parks, R. B., & Oakerson, R. J. (1993). Comparative metropolitan organization: Service production and governance structures in St. Louis (MO) and Allegheny county (PA). Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 23(1), 19-–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3330797

Provost, L. (Ed.). (2016). Public sector accountability through raising concerns. Office of the Auditor-General.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-–667. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization studies, 28(8), 1243-–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840607076586

Robinson, M. (2015). From old public administration to the new public service: Implications for public sector reform in developing countries. UNDP Global Center for Public Service Excellence.

Saito, F. (Ed.). (2008). Foundations for local governance: Decentralization in comparative. perspective. Springer Publishing.

Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Schein, E. H. (1993). Legitimating clinical research in the study of organizational culture. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(6), 703-–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1993.tb02264.x

Smart-Cities Clean Energy. (2017). Krohng gaan kŏn gàen smart city [Khon Kaen smart city project]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHcYnM6YsKY

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE publications.

Startup Thailand. (2016). Gaan Săy-Wá-Naa Hŭa Kôr Smart City Pêua Kàp Klêuan Sàyt-Tà-gìt kŏn gàen láe pâak [Smart city forum to drive the economy of Khon Kaen and the Northeast]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0altJBmPrA

Stoker, G. (1997). Public-private partnerships and urban governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Public-private partnerships in Europe and the United States (pp.18- -- 19). Macmillan.

Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International Journal of Social Science, 50(155), 17-–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12189

Thai PBS. (2018). Yòo dee mee: Smart city têe nêe têe nêe kŏn gàen 6 préut-sà-jì-gaa-yon 2561 [Wellbeing: Smart city. This is Khon Kaen]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJsM3xh5sh8

Theparat,. G. (2018, September 11). Khon Kaen light rail plan set:, pPrivate firm to be hired for construction. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/news/transport/1537778/khon-kaen-light-rail-plan-set

United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/g-attributes.html

UNESCO. (2017). Concept of governance. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/quality-framework/technical-notes/concept-of-governance/

United Nations. (2015). Responsive and accountable public governance:, 2015 world public sector report. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN95253.pdf.

Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review,62(5),527-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00235

Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S. (2014). Managing democracies in turbulent times: Trust, performance, and governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54072-1

Vodden, K. (2009). Experiments in collaborative governance on Canada’s coasts: Challenges and opportunities in governance capacity. In L. Felt, R. Greenwood, & G. Baldacchino (Eds.), Remote control: Lessons in governance for and from small places (pp. xx–xx). Institute of Social and Economic Research.

Wilson, R. H. (2000). Understanding local governance: An international perspective. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 40(2), 51-–63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902000000200006

Yangon Heritage Trust. (2019). Our work. https://www.yangonheritagetrust.org/our-work

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. SAGE Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.

  Cited by:
     None...