The development of 21st-century skills that are deemed necessary for learners to excel in a knowledge-based and highly globalized society is at the core of today’s education system. Towards this end, classroom practices focus on the delivery of instruction using various innovative instructional methodologies. One of the strategies used in Mathematics is the problem- solving approach. The problem-solving approach emphasizes that important mathematics concepts and procedures can be best taught through problem-solving tasks or activities, which engage students in thinking about the important mathematical concepts and skills they need to learn. This study utilized the problem-solving approach as supported by various collaborative strategies as an instructional intervention in teaching mathematics to first year college students and investigated its effects on the enhancement of their performance in and attitude towards College Algebra. The pretest-posttest control group design using two matched groups of respondents based on their intelligence quotient scores and mathematics test scores in the University Admission Test was utilized. Ten problem-solving tasks involving routine, non-routine, and real problems were developed and provided to the experimental group. On the other hand, the conventional approach in teaching and learning was employed in the control group. Necessary data to fulfill the objectives of the study were gathered through the attitude scale questionnaire and the researcher-made test and were analyzed using appropriate statistical tools. The results showed that the experimental group outperformed the control group on the bases of their posttest and mean gain scores. The experimental group also posted significant enhancement of their attitude towards college Algebra. Thus, the problem-solving approach, when applied to classroom instruction, can significantly improve students’ cognitive and affective attributes in mathematics, hence indicating the effectiveness of the approach in teaching mathematics.
Keywords: Affective attributes, cognitive attributes, collaboration, collaborative strategies, mathematics education, problem- solving approach, teaching through problem-solvingAbdullah, N. I., Tarmizi, R. A., & Abu, R. (2010). The effects of problem based learning on mathematics performance and affective attributes in learning statistics at form four secondary level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 370-–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.052
Allen, S. J., & Garden, J. L. (2002). Best practices in collaborative problem solving for intervention design. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 565-–582). Washington, DC, US: National Association of School Psychologists. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-03715-038.
Arslan, Ç., & Altun, M. (2007). Learning to solve non-routine mathematical problems. Elementary Education Online, 6(1), 50-–61.
Asfar, A. I. T., Nur, S., & Asfar, A. I. A. (2019, April). The improvement of mathematical problem-solving through the application of problem posing & solving (PPS) learning model. In A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), Advances in social science, education and social research (pp. xx–xx)1st International Conference on Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (ICAMR 2018). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icamr-18.2019.89
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly jJournal of eEconomics, 118(4), 1279-–1333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801
Baldemor, M. R. & Albay, E. M. (2012). Collaborative learning strategy in enhancing the performance in geometry of high school students. Journal of Teaching & Education, 1(2), 65-–69. Retrieved from http://www.universitypublications.net/jte/0102/pdf/HVD162.pdf.
Becker, J. P., & Shimada, S. (1997). The open-ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1906 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191-1593.
Bernard, M., & Chotimah, S. (2018, September). Improve student mathematical reasoning ability with an open-ended approach using VBA for Powerpoint. In AIP Conference Proceedings, (Vol. 2014(, No. 1), p. 020013). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054417
Boudah, D. J. (2019). Conducting educational research: " Guide to completing a thesis, dissertation, or action research project". SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Brinkman, J., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Hertogh, M., & Rook, L. (2015). Collaboration between subsidiaries with different disciplines in the construction industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 194, 44-–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.118
Büyükduman, İ., & Şirin, S. (2010). Learning portfolio (LP) to enhance constructivism and student autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 55-–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.012
Cai, J., & Lester, F. K. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning: problem Problem solving (Research Brief). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Research_and_Advocacy/research_brief_and_clips/Research_brief_14_-_Problem_Solving.pdf.
Commission on Higher ED Education. Memorandum Order 20, s. 2013. (2013, June 28). General education curriculum: Holistic understandings, intellectual and civic competencies (Memorandum Order 20). Retrieved March 27, 2020 from https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMO-No.20-s2013.pdf.
Cobb, P. (1994). Constructivism in mathematics and science education. Educational Researcher, 23(x), 4-–4.
Confrey, J., & Kazak, S. (2006). A thirty-year reflection on constructivism in mathematics education in PME. In A. Editor (Ed.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 305-–345). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_012
Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375-–402.
Dass, R. (2014). Literature and the 21st century learner. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 289-–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1426
Dey, R. M., de Vries, M. J., & Bosnic‐Anticevich, S. (2011). Collaboration in chronic care: unpacking Unpacking the relationship of pharmacists and general medical practitioners in primary care. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 19 (1), 21-–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00070.x
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In A. Editor, B. Editor & C. Editor (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 275-282). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (Eds.). (2001). The power of problem-based learning: a A practical " how to" for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Stylus Publishing, LLC. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y3qyx3pb.
Eikey, E. V., Reddy, M. C., & Kuziemsky, C. E. (2015). Examining the role of collaboration in studies of health information technologies in biomedical informatics: A systematic review of 25 years of research. Journal of bBiomedical iInformatics, 57, 263-–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.006
Ernest, P. (1988). The Pproblem-solving Aapproach to Mmathematics Tteaching., Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 7 (2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/7.2.82
Evans, S., & Swan, M. (2014). Developing students’ strategies for problem solving in mathematics: The role of pre-designed “Ssample Sstudent Wwork”. Educational Designer, 2(7).
Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky`s zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549-–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.396
Fong, L. L., Sidhu, G. K., & Fook, C. Y. (2014). Exploring 21st century skills among postgraduates in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 130-–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1406
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Mathematical problem solving: Instructional intervention. In. A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children, (pp. 397-–414). Publisher.
Gertrude, K. (2015). Maximizing the effects of collaborative learning through ICT. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1005-–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.571
Gurat, M. G. (2018). Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategies among Student Teachers. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(3), 53-64
Irawan, A., & Surya, E. (2017). Application of the open ended approach to mathematics learning in the sub-subject of rectangular. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, (IJSBAR)(2017) Volume, 33, 270-–279.
Islamiyah, Nurul. (2014). Improve student’s learning outcomes in class X SMK PGRI 2 sidoarjo through an open ended approach. Journal Education Mathematic Stkip Pgri Sidoarjo, Vol.2, No.(2), Issn: 2337-8166xx–xx.
Johnson, P. (2009). The 21st century skills movement. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 11. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ855078.
Karabacak, K., Nalbant, D., & Topçuoğlu, P. (2015). Examination of teacher candidates’ problem solving skills according to several variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3063-–3071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1099
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, 1(8), 227-–247. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y4szsvny.
Krawec, J., & Huang, J. (2017). Modifying a research-based problem-solving intervention to improve the problem-solving performance of fifth and sixth graders with and without learning disabilities. Journal of lLearning dDisabilities, 50(4), 468-–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416645565
Kuzle, Ana. (2018). Problem solving as an instructional method: The use of open problems in technology problem solving instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,. 3(1),. 201569-86. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1052.
Laal, M. (2013). Collaborative learning; elements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 814-–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.153
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-sSocial and bBehavioral sSciences, 31, 486-–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
Laal, M., Naseri, A. S., Laal, M., & Khattami-Kermanshahi, Z. (2013). What do we achieve from learning in collaboration?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1427-–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.057
Langari, M. T., Gorizi, H. Z., & Rezaie, M. (2017). Working within the ZPD: Computer and teacher scaffolding of second language vocabulary learning.
Lester, F., & Charles, R. (2003). Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Pre-K – grade 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Child development and education. Pearson Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Noddings, N. (1990). Chapter 1: Constructivism in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 4, 7-–210.
Ongardwanich, N., Kanjanawasee, S., & Tuipae, C. (2015). Development of 21st century skill scales as perceived by students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 737-–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.716
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). PISA problem solving for tomorrow`s world: First measures of cross-curricular competencies from PISA 2003. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.OECD (2003b)., The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and Sskills., OECD, Paris.
Pacific Policy Research Center. (2010). 21st century skills for students and teachers. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Research & Evaluation Division. Retrieved March 19, 2017 from http://www.ksbe.edu/_assets/spi/pdfs/21_century_skills_full.pdf
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions document. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org.
Pehkonen, E., Näveri, L., & Laine, A. (2013). On teaching problem solving in school mathematics. CEPS j Journal, 3(4), 9-–23.
Romli, S., Distrik, I. W., Herlina, K., Umam, R., Ramadhani, R., & Sumarni, S. (2019). European Journal of Educational Research. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 445-455.
Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vols. 1-0). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288
Schoen, H., & Charles, R. (2003). Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grade 6-12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Schumm, J. S. (Ed.). (2017). Reading assessment and instruction for all learners. Guilford Publications.
Sharpe, S. T., Krawec, J., & Fults, R. (2014). The effects of a mathematical problem-solving intervention on the errors made by middle school students with and without learning disabilities. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(3), xx–xx.
Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630-634. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/003172170909000905?journalCode=pdka.
Simamora, R. E., & Saragih, S. (2018). Improving students’ mathematical problem solving ability and self-efficacy through guided discovery learning in local culture context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61-–72.
Sobandi, R., & Sudarmadji, N. (2015). Knowledge sharing and stakeholder collaboration practice in solo city planning and development: Notes on urban community nurturing processes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 161-–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.076
South African Institute for Distance Education (SAIDE). (2008). Teaching through problem-solving. Retrieved August 12, 2019 from www.saide.org.za.
Srinivas, H. (n.d.). What is collaborative learning? The Global Development Research Center, Kobe; Japan . Retrieved from: http://www.gdrc.org/kmgmt/c-learn/index.html.
Taplin, M. (n.d.). Mathematics through problem solving. Retrieved from https://www.mathgoodies.com/articles/problem_solving.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y6ee7ac6.
Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research.
Widada, W., Herawaty, D., Anggoro, A. F. D., Yudha, A., & Hayati, M. K. (2019, April). Ethnomathematics and outdoor learning to improve problem solving ability. In A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), International Conference on Educational Advances in social sciences, education and social research and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018) (pp. xx–xx). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetep-18.2019.4
Widodo, S. A., Nayazik, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2019, March). Formal student thinking in mathematical problem-solving. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (Vol. 1188, No. 1, p. 012087). IOP Publishing.
Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In A. Editor (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics, 57, 78(pp. xx–xx). Publisher.