The motivation of managers in selecting accounting policy is believed to be beyond the method’s simplicity, ease of implementation, and cost-benefit tradeoff to manage earnings by influencing the treatment of financial information. Anchored on positive accounting theory (PAT), this study examines the factors that influence the managers of 60 publicly listed companies in their choice of accounting methods when used as an income strategy. Specifically, this study evaluates whether efficient contracting, political sensitivity, need for financing, information signaling, investment opportunity set (IOS), and monitoring mechanisms (i.e., ownership concentration, board composition, and external auditor) influence the income strategy of management. Income strategy is based on the portfolio of accounting policies on inventory valuation, subsequent measurement of depreciable PPE, land, investment property, software, and depreciation method. Using partial least square structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM), this study found a significant negative relationship between efficient contracting and income strategy and positive relationship between ownership concentration and income strategy, which suggest the alignment of interests between shareholders and management. Political sensitivity is also found to be negatively significant, which validates that executives of Philippine companies choose income-decreasing policies to reduce the perceived size and resources of the company and eventually avoid government interventions and actions from a labor union.
Keywords: Positive Accounting Theory, Accounting Choice Motivation, Structural Equation ModelingReferences:
Aitken, M. J., & Loftus, J. A. (1994). Determinants of accounting policy choice in the Australian property industry: A Portfolio Approach. Accounting & Finance, 34(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.1994.tb00266.x
Astami, E. W., Hartadi, B., & Tower, G. (2006). Factors explaining management preferences of accounting for goodwill prior to the implementation of IFRS 3. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 8(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5624
Baek, H. Y., & Lee, D. Y. (2016). Motives for and effects of asset revaluation : An examination of South Korean data. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 52, 2808–2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1209360
Bao, S. R., & Lewellyn, K. (2017). Governance and earnings management in emerging markets - An institutionalized agency perspective. International Business Review, 26(1), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.14286abstract
Beatty, A., & Weber, J. (2003). The effects of debt contracting on voluntary accounting method changes. Accounting Review, 78(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.119
Bekiris, F., & Doukakis, L. (2011). Corporate governance and accruals earnings management. Managerial and Decision Economics, 32(August), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1541
Bowen, Robert R. M., Davis, Angela A. K., & Rajgopal, S. (2002). Determinants of revenue-reporting practices for internet firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 523–562. https://doi.org/10.1506/6HEE-6L5G-7104-83H8
Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2011). Financial management: Theory and practice. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Cotter, J. (1999). Asset revaluations and debt contracting. Abacus, 35(3), 268–285. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-6281.00046
Cullinan, C., & Bline, D. (2003). The effects of labor on accounting choice in Canada. Canadian Accounting Journal ArticlePerspectives, 2(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1506/j0yc-861k-yv60-m5va
Cushing, B., & LeClere, M. (1992). Evidence on the determinants of inventory accounting policy. The Accounting Review, 67(2), 355–366.
Dey, C., Grinyer, J., Sinclair, C. D., & El-Habashy, H. (2007). Determinants of accounting choices in Egypt. The Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 8(3), 48–92. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/96754260880001054
Dey, C., Grinyer, J., Sinclair, D., & El-Habashy, H. (2009). An exploration of managers’ reasons for depreciation method choice in Egyptian companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675420910963379
Edralin, D. M. (n.d.). Collective bargaining process and its outcome. Manila : De La Salle University, 1999.
Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 255–307. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00028-3
Guo, F., & Ma, S. (2015). Ownership characteristics and earnings management in China. The Chinese Economy, 48(x), 372–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2015.1067086
Gupta, S. (1995). Determinants of the choice between partial and comprehensive income tax allocation: The case of the domestic international sales. The Accounting Review, 70(3), 489–511. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/248535
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles : SAGE, [2014].
Hand, J. R. M., & Skantz, T. (1998). The economic determinants of accounting choices: The unique case of equity carve-outs under SAB 51. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00005-6
Ibarra, V. C. (2008). Choice of inventory costing method of selected companies in the Philippines. Journal of International Business Research, 7(1), 17–31.
Inoue, T., & Thomas, W. B. (1996). The choice of accounting policy in Japan. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 7(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-646x.1996.tb00061.x
Isa, M. A. (2014). Determinants of accounting choice of noncurrent assets at IFRS first adoption among Nigerian firms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(August), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.091
Kabir, M. H. (2010). Positive Accounting accounting Theory theory and science. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra, 2, 136–149.
Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(x), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203940136
Libby, R., Rennekamp, K. M., & Seybert, N. (2015). Regulation and the interdependent roles of managers, auditors, and directors in earnings management and accounting choice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.09.003
Mazay, V., Wilkins, T., & Zimmer, I. (1993). Determinants of the choice of accounting for investments in associated companies. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00381.x
Miller, M., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411–433. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2351143
Osma, B. G., Mora, A., & Sabater, A. M. (2015). Strategic accounting choice around firm-level labor negotiations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 30(2), 246–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X14560902
Parte-Esteban, L., & García, C. F. (2014). The influence of firm characteristics on earnings quality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.06.008
Peltier-Rivest, D. (1999). The determinants of accounting choices in troubled companies. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 38(4), 28–44. Retrieved from
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In A. Editor, B. Editor & C. Editor (Eds.), Book title (pp. xx–xx). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
Shumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (Third 3rd ed., Vol. 47). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1198/tech.2005.s328
Simon, D., & Costigan, M. (1996). Additional evidence on the determinants of accounting policy choice : The case of positive early adopters of SFAS 96. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 35(4), 49–63.
Skinner, D. J. (1993). The investment opportunity set and accounting procedure choice. Preliminary evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(4), 407–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90034-D
Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1986). The investment opportunity set and corporate policy choices, (Working Paper No. x). University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(92)90029-W
Stockmans, A., Lybaert, N., & Voordeckers, W. (2013). The conditional nature of board characteristics in constraining earnings management in private family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.01.001
Wang, K. T., & Shailer, G. (2017). Family ownership and financial performance relations in emerging markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, 51, 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.05.014
Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134.
Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156.
Waweru, K. M., Pokhariyal, G. P., & Mwaura, M. F. (2012). The signaling hypothesis : Evidence from the Nairobi securities exchanges. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 3(4), 105–118. Retrieved from http://jbsq.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/JBSQ_June2012_8.pdf
Waweru, N. M., & Riro, G. K. (2013). Corporate governance, firm characteristics and earnings management in an emerging economy. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 43–64.
Waweru, N., Prot Ntui, P., & Mangena, M. (2011). Determinants of different accounting methods choice in Tanzania: A positive accounting theory approach. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/20421161111138503
Young, S. (1998). The determinants of managerial accounting policy choice: Further evidence for the UK. Accounting and Business Research, 28(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1998.9728904