The decline of the U.S. and the rise of China have been one of the main drivers of change in the foreign policy of the countries in East Asia. Although having been often called “hedging,” recent developments show more variation in states’ response in the region. President Duterte’s leaning towards China, possibly in response to the economic opportunities given by the Belt and Road Initiative, has reversed the predecessor’s position. This poses puzzles that demand explanations beyond the state-level analysis. This paper examines what accounts for the shift and whether it is sustainable. Although the Philippines’ foreign policy has traditionally been driven by the ruling elites, the election of President Duterte in 2016 has drawn renewed attention to the public as one of the domestic factors that influence foreign policy. Duterte’s pivot to China appears to be conflicting with the general sentiments of the public about the U.S. and China, but in line with their aspirations for economic prosperity, considering the potential economic benefits that China can offer. This paper argues that recent policies can be explained by the dominant sentiment present in East Asia called “econophoria” (Buzan & Segal, 1994), which refers to the prioritization of economic growth to the point that legitimacy comes from rising living standards. It contends that econophoria is not something imposed by the state, but it is a choice by society as well.
Keywords: Philippines-China-US relationship, hedging, South China Sea, Belt and Road Initiative, populism, public preferences and foreign policy, ASEANAcharya, A. (2013). Thinking theoretically about Asian IR. In Shambaugh, D., & Yahuda, M. (Eds), International relations of Asia, (pp. 59-89). New York: Rowman & Littlefield
Arugay, A. A. (2017). The Philippines in 2016: The electoral earthquake and its aftershocks. Southeast Asian Affairs, xxx, 277-–296.
Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides`s trap?. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Atienza, M. E. L. (2019). The Philippines in 2018: Broken promises, growing impatience. Asian Survey, 59(1), 185-–192.
Ba, A. D. (2006). Who`s socializing whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 157-–179.
Ba, A. D. (2009). (Re)N negotiating East and Southeast Asia: rRegion, regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Ba, A. D. (2016). The Philippines confronts a post‐American world: gGeopolitical‐domestic‐institutional intersections. Asian Politics & Policy, 9(4), 530-–540.
Baviera, A. (2012). The influence of domestic politics on Philippine foreign policy: tThe case of Philippines-China relations since 2004 (RSIS Working Paper No. 241)., Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies RSIS Working Paper, (241).
Baviera, A. (2016). President Duterte`s foreign policy challenges. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 38(2),: 202-–208.
Bello, W. (2017). The spider spins his web: Rodrigo Duterte`s ascent to power. Philippine Sociological Review, 65, xx–xx.
Breslin, S. (2013). China and the global order: sSignaling threat or friendship?. International Affairs, 89(3),: 615-–634.
Bull, H. (1971). Order vs. justice in international society. Political Studies, 19(3), 269-283.
Buzan, B., & Segal, G. (1994). Rethinking East Asian security. Survival, 36(2), 3-–21.
Calonza, A., & C, Yap, C. (21 October 2016, October 21). China visit helps Duterte reap funding deals worth $24 billion.”, Bloomberg., rRetrieved on 27 July 2019 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-21/china-visit-helps-duterte-reap-funding-deals-worth-24-billion
Casiple, R. C. (2016). The Duterte presidency is a phenomenon. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 38(2), 179-–184.
Cook, M. (2018). The Philippines in 2017: Turbulent consolidation. Southeast Asian Affairs, 267-–284.
Curato, N. (2017). Flirting with authoritarian fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the new terms of Philippine populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(1), 142-–153.
De Castro, R. C. (2016a). Twenty-first century Philippines’ policy toward an emergent China: fFrom equibalancing to strategic balancing. Asian Politics & Policy, 8(2), 305-–328.
De Castro, R. C. (2016b). The Duterte administration’s foreign policy: Unraveling the Aquino administration’s balancing agenda on an emergent China. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 139-–159.
De Castro, R. C. (2019). Explaining the Duterte administration’s appeasement policy on China: The power of fear. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 45(3-–4), 165-–191.
Fallon, T. (2015). The new silk road: Xi Jinping`s grand strategy for Eurasia. American Foreign Policy Interests, 37(3), 140-–147.
Goh, E. (2008/9). Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing regional security strategies. International Security, 32(3): 113-157.
Goh, E. (2014). Southeast Asia’s evolving security relations and strategies. In Saadia S. M. Pekkanen, John J. Ravenhill and & Rosemary R. Foot. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the international relations of Asia (pp. xx–xx). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goh, E. (2016, February 22). Southeast Asian strategies toward the great powers: sStill hedging after all these years? The Asian Forum. Retrieved on 23 June 2019 from http://www.theasanforum.org/southeast-asian-strategies-toward-the-great-powers-still-hedging-after-all-these-years/
Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: tThe international sources of domestic politics. International oOrganization, 32(4), 881-–912.
Heydarian, R. J. (April 26, 2017, April 26). Duterte’s dance with China. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved on 1 August 2019 from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/philippines/2017-04-26/dutertes-dance-china
Heydarian, R. J. (June 6, 2019a, June 6). Duterte’s dance with Beijing: Philippines’ dual China policy. Foreign Policy., rRetrieved on 1 August 2019 from https://www.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/dutertes-dance-with-beijing-philippines-dual-china-policy
Heydarian R. J. (July 17, 2019b, July 17). The Reed Bank collision: Duterte’s China policy in crisis. Foreign Policy., rRetrieved on 1 August 2019 from https://www.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/the-reed-bank-collision-dutertes-china-policy-in-crisis
Howe, B., & Bang, G. (2017). Nargis and Haiyan: the politics of natural disaster management in Myanmar and the Philippines. Asian Studies Review, 41(1), 58-–78.
Hudson, V. M. (2013). Foreign policy analysis: cClassic and contemporary theory. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2016). Between the eagle and the dragon: America, China, and middle state strategies in East Asia. Political sScience qQuarterly, 131(1), 9-–43.
Johnston, A. I. (2013). How new and assertive is China`s new assertiveness?. International Security, 37(4), 7-–48.
Khong, Y. F. (2014). Foreign policy analysis and the international relations of Asia. In Saadia S. M. Pekkanen, John J. Ravenhill and & Rosemary R. Foot. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the international relations of Asia (pp. xx–xx). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kraft, H. J. S. (2016). Great power dynamics and the waning of ASEAN centrality in regional security. Asian Politics & Policy, 9(4), 597-–612.
Kuik, C. C. (2016). How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), 500-–514.
Medeiros, E. S., Crane, K., Heginbotham, E., & Levin, N. D. (2008). Pacific currents: The responses of US and security partners in East Asia to China`s rise (Vol. 736). Place of publication: Rand Corporation.
Montiel, C. J., Boller, A. J., Uyheng, J., & Espina, E. A. (2019). Narrative congruence between populist President Duterte and the Filipino public: Shifting global alliances from the United States to China. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, x(x), xx–xx.
Moravcsik, A. (1993). Introduction: iIntegrating international and domestic theories of international bargaining. In P. B. Evans, P. B., H. K. Jacobson, H. K., R.D. Putnam, R. D., & R. D. Putnam, R. D. (Eds.). (1993)., Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics (No. 25), (pp. 3-–42). Oakland: University of California Press.
National Institute for Defense Studies. (2017). East Asian strategic review 2017. Retrieved on 25 June 2019 from http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/east-asian/e2017.html.
Paul, T. V. (2005). Soft balancing in the age of US primacy. International Security, 30(1), 46-–71.
Pempel, T. J. (2010). Soft balancing, hedging, and institutional Darwinism: The economic-security nexus and East Asian regionalism. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(2), 209-–238.
Pew Research Center. (2017). People in the Philippines still Favor U.S. over China, but the gap is narrowing. Place of publication: Publisher.
Crismundo, K.Philippines News Agency (PNA) (2019,) (26 April26). World leaders meet in Beijing for Belt and Road forum”.. Retrieved on 25 June 2019 from https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1068245
Purse Pulse Asia Research Inc. 2018 (December 2018). December 2018 Nnationwide Ssurvey on the Pperformance and Ttrust Rratings of Kkey Ggovernment Ofoficials and Iinstitutions. Retrieved on 25 June 2019 from http://www.pulseasia.ph/december-2018-nationwide-survey-on-the-performance-and-trust-ratings-of-key-government-officials-and-institutions/
Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: tThe logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427-–460.
Ripsman, N. M., Taliaferro, J. W., & Lobell, S. E. (2016). Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Risse, T. (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions(Vol. 42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solingen, E. (2007). Pax Asiatica versus Bella Levantina: tThe foundations of war and peace in East Asia and the Middle East. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 757-–780.
Teehankee, J. C. (2012). Clientelism and party politics in the Philippines. In A. Editor & B Editor (Eds.), Party politics in Southeast Asia: Subtitle (pp. 204-–232). Place of publication: Routledge.
Teehankee, J. C. (2016). Duterte`s resurgence in the Philippines: A discursive institutionalist analysis. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 69-–89.
Teehankee, J. C., & Thompson, M. R. (2016). The vote in the Philippines: Electing a strongman. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 125-–134.
Trinidad, D. D. (2017). Domestic factors and strategic partnership: Redefining Philippines‐Japan relations in the 21st century. Asian Politics & Policy, 9(4), 613-–635.
The United States Congress. (2018). Better Utilization of Investments Leading to Development Act of 2018 or the BUILD Act of 2018, retrieved on 25 June 2019 from https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/2463
The United States Department of Defense. (2019). “Indo-Pacific strategy report: Preparedness, partnerships and promoting a networked region.” rRetrieved on 25 June 2019 from https://media.defense.gov/2019/May/31/2002139210/-1/-1/1/DOD_INDO_PACIFIC_STRATEGY_REPORT_JUNE_2019.PDF
Wang, Yong. (2016). Offensive for Ddefensive: The belt and road initiative and China`s new grand strategy. The Pacific Review, 29,: 455-–463.
White HouseObama, B. 17 November (2011, November 17). “Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament.” rRetrieved on 25 June 2019 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament