As the world has become increasingly more connected, the nature of humanitarian problems has also become transnational. To confront them, as a consequence, international cooperation is inevitably needed. In particular, the ongoing Rohingya crisis is the latest example that showcases the state-centered model of ASEAN (or the Southeast Asian) model of regional cooperation that has failed in the area of humanitarian management. Furthermore, it suggests that ASEAN has abandoned the very purpose of its existence as it was conceived in its founding document, the Bangkok Declaration. Against this background, this paper argues that the region’s failure cannot be separated from the region’s rigid understanding of the notion of state sovereignty. Analytically speaking, this paper claims that the current conservative interpretation has significantly contributed to the dampening of the supposedly liberating nature of ASEAN. Thus, it is fair that this requires a healthy dose of a more progressive direction in the region’s interpretation within ASEAN. Moreover, this paper suggests that, should the region take a more progressive turn in its understanding of humanitarianism, it is highly plausible to transform the (conservative) Bangkok Declaration itself as starting point that necessitates “a primary responsibility” among its member states with regard to the advancement and protection of human values in the region and beyond. Given the current worldwide race among the nations to the bottom of ultra-nativism, this could be a fresh start for the region, and ASEAN in particular, to emerge as a leading champion of humanity.
Keywords: global south, governance, humanitarianism, regionalism, sovereigntyAbout. (2005). American University Center for the Global South. Retrieved from http://www1.american.edu/academic.depts/acainst/cgs/about.html
Governing bodies. (2018). Asian Society of International Law. Retrieved from https://www.asiansil.org/about-us/governing-bodies/
The ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration) Bangkok. (1967, August 8). ASEAN. Retrieved from https://asean.org/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration-bangkok-8-august-1967/
Ayoob, M. (2004). Third world perspectives on humanitarian intervention and international administration. Global Governance, 10(1), 99-–118. Accessed from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27800512
Baik, T. (2013). Emerging human rights system in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barelli, M. (2018). Preventing and responding to atrocity crimes: China, sovereignty and the responsibility to protect. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 23(2), 173-–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kry016
Bass, G. J. (2008). Freedom`s battle: The origins of humanitarian intervention. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Bass, G. J. (2015). The Indian way of humanitarian intervention. Yale Journal of International Law, 40(2), 227-–294. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1465&context=yjil
Blocher, J. (2008). Institutions in the marketplace of ideas. Duke Law Journal, 57(4), 821-–889. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1346&context=dlj
Brownlie, I. (1991). International law and the use of force by states. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cate, I. M. T. (2010). Speech, truth, and freedom: An examination of John Stuart Mill’s and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s free speech defenses. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 22(1), 35-–48. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1354&context=yjlh
Charney, J. I. (1993). Universal international law. American Journal of International Law, 87(4), 529-–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203615
Chesterman, S. (2000). Just war or just peace? Humanitarian intervention and international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chimni, B. S. (2004). International institutions today: An imperial global state in the making. European Journal of International Law, 15(1), 1-–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.1.1
Chimni, B. S. (2007). A just world under law: A view from the south. American University Law Review, 22(2), 199-–220. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1117&context=auilr
Coast, E. (2002). Population trends in developing countries. LSE Research Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/268/1/Arnold.pdf
Davies, S. E. (2006). The Asia rejection? International refugee law in Asia. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 52(4), 562-–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2006.00433a.x
Diversity challenge. [Editorial]. (2014, September 14). Nature, p.x(x), 279–xxx.
Geyer, M. (2015). Humanitarianism and human rights. In F. Klose (Ed.), The emergence of humanitarian intervention: Ideas and practice from the nineteenth century to the present (pp. 31-–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ginsburg, T. (2006). Locking in democracy: Constitutions, commitment, and international law. NYU Journal of International Law & Politics 38(4), 707-–760. Retrieved from https://nyujilp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/38.4-Ginsburg.pdf
Ginsburg, T. (2011). Eastphalia and Asian regionalism. University of California at Davis Law Review, 44(3), 859-–877. Retrieved from https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/44/3/Concept%20of%20Asia%20in%20International%20Law/Ginsburg.pdf
Global conflict tracker. (2018, November 26). Council of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/interactives/global-conflict-tracker#!/global-conflict-tracker
Goodman, R. (2006). Humanitarian intervention and pretext for war. American Journal of International Law, 100(1), 107-–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/3518833
Gordon, J. (1997). John Stuart Mill and the “marketplace of ideas.” Social Theory & Practice, 23(2), 235-–249. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23559183
Gray, K., & Gills, B. K. (2016). South–South cooperation and the rise of the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 37(4), 557-–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1128817
Greenwood, C. (1993). Is there a right of humanitarian intervention? The World Today, 49(2), 34-–40. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40396480
History. (n.d.). ASEAN. Retrieved from https://asean.org/asean/about-asean/history/
Iskandar, P. (2016). Constitutionalizing human rights universality in non-constitutional legal system: Decoding Indonesian human rights brouhaha. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 3(1), 3-42. Retrieved from http://international.vlex.com/vid/constitutionalizing-human-rights-universality-592364282
Iskandar, P. (2016a). Pancasila delusion. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(4), 723-–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1195430
Iskandar, P., & Piper, N. (2016). Why low-skilled migration matters. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 3(3) 577-–581. Retrieved from http://international.vlex.com/vid/why-low-skilled-migration-646584445
Iskandar, P. (2018a, October 31). A democracy needs international law [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.ijil.org/blog/a-democracy-needs-international-law
Iskandar, P. (2018a2018c). Non-citizen rights in ASEAN: The need to chart a new course. Social & Legal Studies, 27(2), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917746485
Iskandar, P. (2018b). Indigenizing constitutionalism: A critical reading of “Asian constitutionalism.” Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 5(1), 3-–42. Retrieved from http://international.vlex.com/vid/indigenizing-constitutionalism-critical-reading-708064953
Iskandar, P. (2019). Religious constitutionalism: An interpretive reading. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 6(1), 55-–93.
Jackson, R. H. (1996). Quasi-states: Sovereignty, international relations and the third world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, L. (2012) ASEAN, sovereignty and intervention in Southeast Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Juwana, H. (2012). Hukum internasional sebagai instrumen politik: Beberapa pengalaman Indonesia sebagai studi kasus [English translation]. Arena Hukum, 5, 106-–114. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2012.00502.4
Kaldor, M., & Chinkin, C. (2018, April 22). The “doctrine of humanitarian intervention”: And how it exposes the absence of any serious intention to help Syrians. openDemocracy. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net/mary-kaldor-christine-chinkin/doctrine-of-humanitarian-intervention-and-how-it-exposes-absence-of-an
Kvanvig, G. (n.d.). ASEAN, sovereignty and human rights. Retrieved from https://www.jus.uio.no/smr/english/about/programmes/vietnam/docs/asean-sovereignty-and-human-rights---gisle-kvanvig.pdf
Mason, A., & Wheeler N. (1996). Realist objections to humanitarian interventions. In B. Holden (Ed.), The ethical dimension of global change (pp. 94-–110). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
Mill, J. S. (2001). On liberty. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Orford, A. (2003). Reading humanitarian intervention: Human rights and the use of force in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de la Rasilla, I. (2018). A very short history of international law journals (1869-2018). European Journal of International Law, 29(1), 137-–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy005.
BBC NewsRohingya crisis. (2017, October 19). Rohingya crisis: The world’s fastest growing humanitarian crisisBBCNews [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT7QUzJg0aM
Sauer, E. (1956). Universal principles in international law. Transactions of Grotius Society, 42, 181-–191. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/743133
Schachter, O. (1984). The legality of pro-democratic invasion. American Journal of International Law, 78(3), 645-–650. https://doi.org/10.2307/2202602
Sim, E. (2014). The outsourcing of legal norms and institutions by the ASEAN economic community. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 1(1), 314-–332. Retrieved from http://international.vlex.com/vid/outsourcing-institutions-asean-community-501594042
Simma, B. (2009). Universality of international law from the perspective of a practitioner. European Journal of International Law, 20(2), 265-–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp028
Source publication list for web of science. (May 2017). Clarivate Analytics. Retrieved from: http://mjl.clarivate.com/publist_ssci.pdf
Tay, S. (2013). Growing an ASEAN voice? A common platform in global and regional governance. Retrieved from http://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2013-16.pdf
Tesón, F. R. (1988). Humanitarian intervention: An inquiry into law and morality. New York: Transnational Publishers.
The world population is projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100. (2017, June 21). United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2017.html
Weiss, T. G. (2016). Humanitarian intervention: Ideas in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Weiss, T. G., & Collins, C. (2018). Humanitarian challenges and intervention: Subtitle here. New York: Routledge.
Welsh, J. (2003). Introduction. In J. M. Welsh (Ed.),. Humanitarian intervention and international relations (pp. 1-–7). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wheeler, N. J. (2000). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woods, S. (2008). Thinking about diversity of thought [Working Paper]. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1106&context=workingpapers