This paper aims to provide an alternative viewpoint on China and the South China Sea islands dispute through the use of political geography. Specifically, this piece employs a world-systems approach and critical political geography [or critical geopolitics] to understand four phenomena: first, the political-economic rationale behind China’s territorial ambitions through the nexus of its political ideology and position in the world economy; second, these ambitions using the “One Belt, One Road initiative;” third, its rise as a potential global hegemon; and lastly, the narratives behind its actions in the South China Sea islands dispute. The paper makes no claims about the superiority of world-systems and critical political geographies in explaining a state’s territorial ambition or expansionary behavior. What it attempts to provide is a different, yet complementary, lens to probe issues like this, which typically are confined to the realm of traditional geopolitics or realist international relations. World-systems and critical political geography offer a promise of cogently examining regional and global issues of this nature.
Keywords: China, world-systems analysis, critical political geography, South China Sea islands disputeAlbert, E. (2015). Shanghai cooperation organization. Council on Foreign Relations., Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/shanghai-cooperation-organization.
Agnew, J. (1998). Geopolitics. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Agnew, J., Mitchell, K., & Toal, G. (Eds.). (2003). A companion to political geography. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
Blacksell, M. (2006). Political geography. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Bulloch, D. (2017, March 3). China is running out of cheap rural labor and it’s because of failed reforms. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglasbulloch/ 2017/03/03/china-is-running-out-of-cheap-rural-labor-and-its-because-of-failed-reforms/#5c3b3be525c6.
Chang, F. K. (2012). China`s naval rise and the South China Sea: An operational assessment. Orbis, 56(1), 19-–38.
Chase-Dunn, C., & Grimes, P. (1995). World-systems analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 387-–417.
Council on Foreign Relations. (2018, July 21). Territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Global Conflict Tracker. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/interactives/global-conflict-tracker#!/conflict/territorial-disputes-in-the-south-china-sea.
De Castro, R. C. (2017). China’s realpolitik approach to its territorial disputes: tThe case of the 2012 Scarborough sShoal stand-off. In B. Courmont, F. Lassere, & E. Mottet (Eds.), Assessing maritime disputes in East Asia: Political and legal perspectives (pp. 190-–212). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.