The Development of the Filipino Coping Strategies Scale

Article Details

John Robert C. Rilveria, Contact: jcrilveria@up.edu.ph, Diliman

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Social Science Review
Volume 18 Issue 1 (Published: 2018-06-01)

Abstract

The development of the Filipino Coping Strategies Scale was based on the qualitative data on the resilience of Filipinos and the ways by which they cope with stressful life experiences and the quantitative data on foreign measures of coping. Integration of both data led to the formulation of nine coping strategies: cognitive reappraisal (pagsusuri), social support (paghingi ng tulong), problem-solving (pagtugon), religiosity (pagka relihiyoso), tolerance (pagtitiis), emotional release (paglabas ng saloobin), overactivity (pagmamalabis), relaxation/recreation (paglilibang), and substance use (pagbibisyo). Initially, the scale was composed of 45 items with five items under each domain. This was pilot tested to 627 male and female Filipinos aged 18 above. Reliability analysis revealed items that are internally consistent with each other resulting in the reduction of items to 37. Furthermore, construct validity was established via a) factor analysis through principal components analysis extraction method and varimax rotation method and b) test for convergent validity by correlating each domain of the Filipino Coping Strategies Scale with the corresponding domains of Ways of Coping by Folkman and Lazarus and the COPE Inventory by Carver, Scheier and Weintraub. Independent samples t-test revealed significant differences among males and females in each coping strategy which served as the basis for norm groups. The Filipino Coping Strategies Scale is a four-point Likert scale which aims to measure the coping strategies of Filipinos towards stress and generates a coping dispositional profile which can be used to aid in the assessment of coping behaviors

Keywords: coping strategies, reliability analysis, construct validity, factor analysis, coping dispositional profile

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/research/journals/apssr/2018-June-vol18-1/9-the-development-of-the-filipino-coping-strategies-scale.pdf
  References:

Amirkhan, J. H. (1990). A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The Coping Strategy Indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1066-1075.

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-–283.

De Leon, J., & Balila, E. (2014). Filipino Adolescents` Coping Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Adventist University of the Philippines Research Journal, 18(2), 73-–81. Retrieved from http://www.aup.edu.ph/alumni/wp-content/uploads/R7.pdf

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Pub. Co.

Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.

Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. (1986). The dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992-1003.

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual for the Ways of Coping Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.

Halili-Jao, N. (2009, April 5). Coping Mechanisms of Pinoys. Philippine Star. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com/allure/454890/coping-mechanisms-pinoys

Jaloweic, A. (2001). Jalowiec Coping Scale. Loyola University of Chicago.

Jeffrey, K., Wheatley, H. & Abdallah, S. (2016). The Happy Planet Index: 2016. A global index of sustainable well-being. London: New Economics Foundation.

Krohne, H. W. (2002). Stress and Coping Theories. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 15163-–15170. doi: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03817-1.

Ladrido-Ignacio, L., & Perlas, A. (1995). From Victims to Survivors: Psychosocial Intervention in Disaster Management in the Philippines. International Journal of Mental Health, 24(4), 3-–51.

Lawrence, J., Ashford, K., & Dent, P. (2006). Gender differences in coping strategies of undergraduate students and their impact on self-esteem and attainment. SAGE Publications, 7(3), 273–281 doi: 10.1177/1469787406069058.

Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1401-–1415, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.010.

Patterson, J. M. & McCubbin, H.I. (1987). Adolescent coping style and behaviors: conceptualizations and measurement. Journal of Adolescence, 10(2), 153-186.

Phan, D. (2013). Integrating Personality and Coping Styles in Predicting Well-Being Across Cultures. Washington State University – Department of Psychology.

Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R., & Dodge, K. (1994). Gender Differences in Coping with Stress: When Stressor and Appraisals Do Not Differ. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 20(4), 421-–430.

Tan, M. (2006, September 19). Stress and the Filipino. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Retrieved from http://pcij.org/stories/stress-and-the-filipino/

Weiten, W., & Lloyd, M. A. (2008). Psychology Applied to Modern Life (9th ed.). Place of publication: Wadsworth Cengage Learning

Zeidner, M. & Endler, N.S. (1996). A Critical Survey of Coping Instruments. Handbook of Coping. New York: Wiley.

  Cited by: