The Quality of Mind of the Young Marx: Extensions and Expansions

Article Details

Reindel Owen Salvador, resalvador@upd.edu.ph, University of the Philippines-Diliman

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Social Science Review
Volume 17 Issue 3 (Published: 2018-03-01)

Abstract

The paper is structured in three sections. The first part is a demonstration of Karl Marx’s timeless signature thinking styles—- the radical and the dialectical—- through a revisit of the competing notions of human nature and accounts of alienation from various traditions—- mostly economic and philosophic. His engagements of these dominant narratives did not only usher him to propose his own theory but more saliently the young Marx, an interlocutor in this skirmish of ideas, exhibited his cerebral styles to attenuate these monolithic knowledge structures and to justify why a new episteme of human nature is warranted. The radical and dialectical imaginations of Marx will be intentionally magnified for the “immortalization” project. The second part showcases another warrant for celebrating his celebration and it also offers a humble means of immortalizing his signature thought processes.

Keywords: nan

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/research/journals/apssr/2018-March-vol17-3/10-the-quality-of-mind-of-the-young-marx-extensions-and-expansions.pdf
  References:

Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London, England: Monthly Review Press.

Berthoff, A. (1997). Remembering Paulo Freire. JAC, 17(3), 305–-310. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–-25.

Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Bruce, S., & Yearley, S. (2006). The sage dictionary of sociology. London, England: Sage. Connell, R. (1997). Why is classical sociology classical? American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1511–-1557.

Curato, N. (2013). A sociological reading of classical sociological theory. Philippine Sociological Review, 61(2), 265-287. Currie, R. J. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed by Paulo Freire. Peabody Journal of Education, 49(2), 161–-164.

Freire, P. (1921). Pedagogy of the oppressed, translated by (Myra Bergman Ramos, Trans). New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.

Goering, J. D. (1968). Education for alienation by Nathaniel Hickerson. The High School Journal, 51(6), 275–-276.

Hammen, O. J. (1970). The young mMarx, reconsidered. Journal of the History of Ideas, 31(1), 109–-120.

Held, J. M. (2009). Marx via feuerbach: Species being revisited. Idealistic Studies, 39(1-3), 137–-148.

Hibben, J. (1910). The dialectic imagination. The North American Review, 192(657), 202–-208.

Hodges, D. (1965). Marx’s contribution to humanism. Science and Society, 29(2), 173–-191.

Kampf, L., & O’Neil, W. (1977). At work in school. The Radical Teacher, 5, 43–-49.

Marx, K. (1959). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Marx, K. ([1844]1994). A contribution to the critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right. In J. O’Malley & R. Davis (Eds.), Marx: Early political writings (pp. 1–-28). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1844).

Mkandawire, P. T. (1975). Pedagogy of the oppressed by Paulo Freire. Transition, 48, 73–-74.

Morrison, K. (1995). Marx, Durkheim, Weber: Formations of modern social thought. London, England: Sage. Oishi, T. (2001). The unknown Marx: Reconstructing a unified perspective. London, England: Pluto Press.

Philippine Social Sciences Center. (2014, August 14). From education to life-long learning: AP paradigm shift for the 21st century by Dr. Cynthia Bautista [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lA19Ps3J_Y

Ritzer, G. (2010). Sociological theory (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Sayers, S. (2005). Why work? Marx and human nature. Science and Society, 69(4), 606–-616.

Santili, P. (1973). Marx on species-being and social essence. Studies in Soviet Thought, 13(1/2), 76–-88.

Sternheimer, K. (2016, August 18). The logic of consumption: Education [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.everydaysociologyblog.com/2016/08/the-logic-of-consumption-education.html

Thompson, L. (1979). The development of Marx’s concept of alienation. Mid-American Review of Sociology, 4(1), 23–-38.

University of Amsterdam. (2015, August 04). Homo faber [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEK7xUmWCus

Wartenberg, T. E. (1982). Species-being and human nature in Marx. Human Studies, 5 (2), 77–-95. Wilde, L. (n.d.). Logic: Dialectic and contradiction. Retrieved December 01, 2016, from https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/en/wilde1.htm

Williamson, I., & Cullingford, C. (1997). The uses and misuses of alienation in the social sciences and education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(3), 263–-275.

  Cited by:
     None...