As elsewhere, the incidence of non-standard employment is increasing in the Philippines amidst declining union density rates during the last 15 years. This twin phenomenon has posed challenges to trade unions’ structures and their understanding of representation. Based on the author’s survey of union strategies on non-standard employment adopted by 93 Metro Manila-based enterprise unions and 13 national federations in four industries—manufacturing, banking and finance, hotels and restaurants, and private education—the article identifies and examines the variety of ways trade unions, both at the enterprise and at the national level, attempt to represent non-standard workers and regulate employers’ use of non-standard forms of employment, and the factors that influence both union actions. The analysis demonstrates the unions’ preference of regulation over representation, and that this can be explained by the higher difficulties and constraints that unions face in pursuing the latter. Nevertheless, this article has established the emergence of a “‘bricolage of organizational forms”’ and a plurality of innovative union initiatives aimed at protecting non-standard workers and arresting the spread of precarious non-standard employment.
Keywords: Non-standard employment, non-standard workers, precarious work, trade unions, PhilippinesAganon, M. E., Serrano, M. R., Mercado, R. C., & CertrzaCerteza,. R. A. (2008). Revitalizing Philippine unions – Potentials and constraints to social movement unionism. Quezon City: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung and U.P. School of Labor and Industrial Relations.
Benassi, C., & Vlandas, T. (2015). Union inclusiveness and temporary agency workers: The role of power resources and ideology. European Journal of Industrial Relations. DOIdoi: 10.1177/0959680115589485.
Bureau of Labor Relations. (2016). Existing labor organizations, workers association, and collective bargaining agreements, as of December 2016. Retrieved from http://www.blr.dole.gov.ph/blr_files/statistical_reports/2016/4qtr/2016_4thqtr_existinglowascbas.pdf.
Dawson, C., Veliziotis, M., & Hopkins, B. (2017). Temporary employment, job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(1), 69–-98.
Fine, J. (2015). Alternative labor protection movements in the United States: Reshaping industrial relations? International Labor Review, 154(1), 1–-26.
Flavin, P., Pacek, A. C., & Radcliff, B. (2010). Labor unions and life satisfaction: Evidence from new data. Social Indicators Research, 98, 435–449.
Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do? New York: Basic Books.
Frege, C., and & Kelly, J. (2003). Union revitalization strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 368–375.
Haiven, L. (2006). Expanding the union zone: Union renewal through alternative forms of worker organization. Labor Studies Journal, 31(3), 85–116.
Heckscher, C., and Carre, F. (2006). Strengths in networks: Employment rights organizations and the problem of coordination. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(4), 605-628.
Heery, E. (2003). Gewerkschaftliche Strategien gegen den Mitgliederschwund [English translation here]. WSI-Mitteilungen, 56, 522–-527. English draft version of the article retrieved from https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/wsimit_eng_2003_09_heery.pdf.
Heery, E., & Lee, A. (2004). Organizing the unorganized. In C. Frege & J. Kelly (Eds.) Varieties of unionism: Strategies for union revitalization in a globalizing economy (pp. 45-69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoque, K., Earls, J., Conway, N., & Bacon, N. (2017). Union representation, collective voice and job quality: An analysis of a survey of union members in the UK finance sector. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(1), 27–-50.
International Labor Organization. (2016). Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects. Geneva: International Labour OrganizationAuthor.
Philippine Information AgencyPIA. (2017). DOLE sets qualifications on deputizing labor laws compliance inspectors. Retrieved from http://pia.gov.ph/news/articles/231493689864.
Philippine Statistics AuthorityPSA. (2015a, September). Statistics on agency-hired workers. LabStat Updates, 19(1). Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/vol19_11_0.pdf.
Philippine Statistics AuthorityPSA. (2015b). 2015 Yearbook of labor statistics. Manila: Philippine Statistics AuthorityAuthor.
Philippine Statistics AuthorityPSA. (2016, May). Statistics on non-regular workers. LabStat Updates, 20(10). Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/attachments/ird/pressrelease/Vol20_10%20Statistics%20on%20Non-Regular%20Workers%20%28Second%20of%20a%20%20series%29__FINAL2.pdf.
Regalia, I. (2006). Regulating new forms of employment: Local experiments and social innovation in Europe. London: Routledge.
Serrano, M. R. (Ed.). (2014). (Ed.) Between flexibility and security: The rise of non-standard employment in selected ASEAN countries. Jakarta: ASEAN Services Employees Trade Unions Council.
Serrano, M. R., & Xhafa, E. (2014, March). Organizing precarious workers in the 21st century: Emerging models, lessons and insights from ‘new’ organizing initiatives in the Philippines. [Research Report]. Philippines: International Labor Organization, Philippines.