Social media can benefit English as a foreign language (EFL) learning, but learners need a deliberate approach to pursue deeper learning. To this end, the aim of this study was to design a prewriting activity using a mobile-based concept map to assess participants’ writing performance in different aspects of writing. The designed prewriting activity comprised (1) structuralized private knowledge, (2) explicit knowledge affordance, and (3) consolidated social activities. To evaluate the effects of the prewriting activity, an EFL prewriting experiment was conducted. In this experiment, 80 participants in a high school in Taiwan were evenly assigned to a control or experimental group. The participants’ writing essays and learning perceptions were collected, and the analysis results indicated that (1) a significant difference was found in the aspects of communicative quality, linguistic accuracy, and linguistic appropriacy, and (2) the questionnaire statistics aligned with similar findings that the prewriting activity helped learners’ writing from communicative quality and social collaboration perspectives.
Keywords: Mobile-assisted language learning Prewriting activity English as a foreign language writing Prewriting strategyFelix, U. (2002). The web as a vehicle for constructivist approaches in language teaching. ReCALL, 14(1), 2–15.
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Henning, G. (1991). Communicative writing profiles: An investigation of the transferability of a multiple-trait scoring instrument across ESL writing assessment contexts. Language Learning, 41(3), 337–373.
Hanf, M. P. (1971). Mapping: A technique for translating reading into thinking. Journal of Reading, 14(4), 225–230.
Harley, B., Howard, J., & Roberge, B. (1996). Teaching vocabulary: An exploratory study of direct techniques. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 281–304.
Johnson, D., & Steele, V. (1996). So many words, so little time: Helping college EFL learners acquire vocabulary building strategies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 39(5), 348–357.
Kinchin, I., & Hay, D. (2005). Using concept maps to optimize the composition of collaborative student groups: A pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(2), 182–187.
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Cheng, C. C., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Computer-supported cooperative prewriting for enhancing young EFL learners’ writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 134–155.
Lee, C., & Tan, S. (2010). Scaffolding writing using feedback in students’ graphic organizers: Novice writers’ relevance of ideas and cognitive loads. Educational Media International, 47(2), 135–152.
Lu, F. C., & Chang, B. (2016). Role-play game-enhanced English for a specific-purpose vocabulary-acquisition framework. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 367–377.
Morin, R., & Goebel, J. J. (2001). Basic vocabulary instruction: Teaching strategies or teaching words? Foreign Language Annals, 34(1), 8–17.
Murdock, J. L., & Williams, A. M. (2011). Creating an online learning community: Is it possible? Innovative Higher Education, 36(5), 305–315.
Neumann, H., & McDonough, K. (2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84–104.
Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese EFL writers. System, 34(4), 566–585.
Pishghadam, R., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2006). On the impact of concept mapping as a prewriting activity on EFL learners’ writing ability. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 34–45.
Polat, N., Mancilla, R., & Mahalingappa, L. (2013). Anonymity and motivation in asynchronous discussions and L2 vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 57–74.
Prensky, M. (2005). In digital games for education, complexity matters. Educational Technology, 45(4), 22–28.
Shi, L. (1998). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students’ compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 319–345.
Sturm, J., & Rankin-Erickson, J. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 124–139.
Sweigart, W. (1991). Classroom talk, knowledge development, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(4), 469–496.
Talebinezhad, M. R., & Negari, G. M. (2007). The effect of explicit teaching of concept mapping in expository writing on EFL students’ self-regulation. The Linguistics Journal, 2(1), 69–90.
Thorne, S. L., Black, R., & Sykes, J. (2009). EFL use, socialization, and learning in Internet interest communities and online games. Modern Language Journal, 93(5), 802–821.
Voon, H. (2010). The use of brainstorming and role playing as pre-writing strategy. The International Journal of Learning, 17(3), 537–558.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
Wood, D., & O’Malley, C. (1996). Collaborative learning between peers: An overview. Educational Psychology in Practice, 11(4), 4–9.
Wu, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2014). Exploring the process of planning and implementation phases in an online project-based discussion activity integrating a collaborative concept mapping tool. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 135–141.
Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 115–132.