Teacher professional development has been considered as the most effective strategy to promote teacher change. However, this mostly presupposes that teacher professional development programmes can change teachers’ attitudes and beliefs, subsequently change classroom behaviours and practices, and ultimately improve student learning outcomes. This article reports a case of a learning study of secondary school students learning mathematics in Hong Kong. It appeared that the learning study helped to improve student learning outcomes, enhance teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, and change teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about professional development. An explanatory framework for learning study drawing on previous work of Guskey (Evaluating professional development, Corwin, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002) and Desimone (Educ Res 38:181–199, 2009) is proposed. These promising results suggest that schools should consider incorporating learning study as a regular and sustained practice among teachers. At the same time, teacher educators may capitalize on this form of teacher learning to refine the existing mode of teacher professional development.
Keywords: Learning study Mathematics education Teacher professional development Teacher change Change modelAdamson, B., & Walker, E. (2011). Messy collaboration: Learning from a learning study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 29–36.
Baba, T. (2007). How is lesson study implemented? In M. Isoda, Y. Ohara, T. Miyakawa, & M. Stephens (Eds.), Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement (pp. 2–7). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Burghes, D., & Robinson, D. (2009). Lesson study: Enhancing mathematics teaching and learning [Electronic Version]. Retrieved Oct 29, 2011 from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/papers/lessonstudy.pdf.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fulton, K. P., & Riel, M. (1999). Collaborative online continuing education: Professional development through learning communities [Electronic Version]. Retrieved Oct 29, 2011 from http://www.edutopia.org/professional-development-through-learning-communities.
Givvin, K. B., Jacobs, J., Hollingsworth, H., & Hiebert, J. (2009). What is effective mathematics teaching? International educators’ judgments of mathematics lessons from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry, & N.-Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives: National and cross-national studies (pp. 37–70). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Gregg, J., & Gregg, D. U. (2007). Interpreting the standard division algorithm in a “Candy Factory” context. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(1), 25–31.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.
Kaasila, R., Pehkonen, E., & Hellinen, A. (2010). Finnish pre-service teachers’ and upper secondary students’ understanding on division and reasoning strategies used. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 247–261.
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020–1041.
Lam, S. F., & Law, Y. K. (2008). Open attitudes, attribution beliefs, and knowledge of Hong Kong teacher interns in an era of education reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(2), 177–187.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, J. F. K. (2008). A Hong Kong case of lesson study—Benefits and concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1115–1124.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 18–22.
Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304.
Lim, C., Lee, C., Saito, E., & Haron, S. S. (2011). Taking stock of lesson study as a platform for teacher development in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 353–365.
Lo, M. L. (2004). The development of Learning Study in Hong Kong as a powerful tool for teachers’ professional learning and factors that lead to its success. Paper presented at the Australian association for research in education 2004 international education research conference.
Lo, M. L., Chik, P. M., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Patterns of variation in teaching the color of light to primary 3 students. Instructional Science, 34(1), 1–19.
Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y., & Chik, P. M. P. (2005). For each and everyone—Catering for individual differences through learning study. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McCaughtry, N. (2005). Elaborating pedagogical content knowledge: What it means to know students and think about teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 379–395.
Meyer, R. D. (2005). Lesson study: The effects on teachers and students in urban middle schools. Unpublished Ed.D. thesis, Baylor University, USA.
Miller, J., & Glassner, B. (2002). The ‘inside’ and the ‘outside’: Finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 99–112). London: Sage.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpartrick, J. Swafford & B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Parks, A. N. (2008). Messy learning: Preservice teachers’ lessons study conversations about mathematics and students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 1200–1216.
Protheroe, N. (2007). What does good math instruction look like? Principal, 87(1), 51–54.
Puchner, L. D., & Taylor, A. R. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 922–934.
Richardson, K., Pratt, S., & Kurtts, S. (2010). Imagery and utilization of an area as a way of teaching long division: Meeting diverse student needs. Oklahoma Journal of School Mathematics, 2(1), 14–24.
Sarason, S. B. (2002). Educational reform: A self-scrutinizing memoir. New York: Teachers College Press.
Shengliang, P. (2003). Some reflections on mathematics, mathematics education and mathematicians [Electronic Version]. The China Papers. Retrieved Oct 29, 2011 from http://sydney.edu.au/science/uniserve_science/pubs/china/vol2/panshengliang.pdf.
Siu, I. Y. M. (2008). Learning study as an approach to teacher development in two primary schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 99–108.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (n.d.). Learning for the 21st century [Electronic Version]. Retrieved Oct 29, 2011 from http://www.p21.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=42.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.