Proliferation of Shadow Education Institutions (SEI’s) in the Philippines: A Time Series Analysis

Article Details

Allan B. de Guzman,, nan, The Graduate School, College of Nursing, College of Education, Research Cluster on Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
Belinda V. de Castro,, nan, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 22 Issue 3 (Published: 2013-08-01)

Abstract

While the issue on the existence of shadow education institutions (SEI’s) has only recently been the subject of investigation in studies in various countries worldwide, it is clear that its market is a huge industry in much of Asia and is growing fast elsewhere. Capitalizing on the annual number of SEI’s gathered from key government agencies and processed through time series analysis, this paper purports to establish hard data on shadow education proliferation (1980–2011) in the Philippines with a view of providing valuable insights to both business and educational management areas and to policy makers. Trend analysis showed that prior to 1980, the number of SEI’s established per year was negligible but has gained momentum from 1996 to 2004. Apparently, variability in the number of SEI’s established each year shall depend on certain business regulation policies of the government, the quality of mainstream education in the country, and workplace competition.

Keywords: Shadow education Tutorial center Review center Trend analysis

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-013-0069-x
  References:

Aurini, J., & Davies, S. (2004). The transformation of private tutoring: Education in a franchise form. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(3), 419–438.

Baker, D., Akiba, M., LeTendre, G., & Wiseman, A. (2001). Worldwide shadow education: Outside-school learning, institutional quality of schooling and cross-national mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 1–17.

Bray, M. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring: Comparative perspectives on patterns and implications. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 36(4), 515–530.

Bray, M. (2007). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners (2nd ed.). Paris: UNESCO: International Institute for Education Planning.

Bray, M. (2010). Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 3–13.

Bray,M. (2002). The costs and financing of education: Trends and policy implications. Education in Developing Asia, 3. Asian Development Bank.

CMO 49 and CMO 21. Retrieved November 10, 1009 at Commission on Higher Education (CHED), http://www.ched.gov.ph/.

Corporation Code of the Philippines (2012). Retrieved November 16, 2012 from http://www.usig.org/countryinfo/laws/Philippines/.

de Castro, B., & de Guzman, A. (2010). Push and pull factors affecting Filipino students’ Shadow Education (SE) participation. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 7(1), 43–66.

de Castro, B., & de Guzman, A. (2012). From scratch to notch: Understanding private tutoring metamorphosis in the Philippines from the perspective of cram and formal school administrators. Education and Urban Society,. doi:10.1177/0013124512439888.

Dindyal, J., & Besoondyal, H. (2007). Private tutoring in mathematics: The Mauritian experience. Proceedings of the redesigning pedagogy: Culture, knowledge and understanding conference, Singapore, May 2007.

Executive Order No. 566 (2009). The Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (RIRRs) governing the establishment and operation of review centers and similar entities in the Philippines. Retrieved November 10, 2009 from http://www.ops.gov.ph/records/eo_566.htm.

Hartman, S. (2008). The informal market of education in Egypt: Private tutoring and its implications. Retrieved February 8, 2009, from http://www.ifeas.uni-mainz.de/workingpapers/AP88.pdf.

Kwak, B. S. (2004). Struggle against private lessons in the Korean education context. Paper Presented at the Pacific circle consortium 28th annual conference 2004, Tai Po, Hong Kong, 21–23.

Kwok, P. (2004). Emergence of demand for private supplementary tutoring in Hong Kong: Argument, indicators and implications. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 3, 1–14.

Mori, I., & Baker, D. (2010). The origin of universal shadow education: what the supplemental education phenomenon tells us about the postmodern institution of education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 36–48.

Paik, S., & Shim, W. (2012). Tracking and college major choices in academic high schools in South Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,. doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0035-z.

Paviot, L., Heinsohn, N., & Korkman, J. (2008). Extra tuition in Southern and Eastern Africa: Coverage, growth and linkages with pupil achievement. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 149–160.

Supreme Court (SC) (2009), http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/publications/benchmark/2009/04/040903.php.

Silova, I., & Bray, M. (2006). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tutoring. Overview and country reports. New York: Open Society Institute.

Torres, T. (2008). Review centers still not under CHED SC orders status quo. Retrieved January 15, 2010 from www.inquirer.net.

Department of Education (DepEd), http://www.deped.gov.ph/.

Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), http://www.dti.gov.ph/splash.html and www.bnrs.dti.gov.ph.

National Statistics Office (NSO), http://www.nso.gov.ph/.

Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), http://www.sec.gov.ph/.

  Cited by:
     None...