It Takes Two to Tango: Phenomenologizing Collaborative Mindset of Filipino Academic Deans

Article Details

Allan B. de Guzman,, nan, The Graduate School, College of Nursing, College of Education, Research Cluster on Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
Ma. Frieda Z. Hapan, , The Graduate School, College of Nursing, College of Education, Research Cluster on Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 22 Issue 3 (Published: 2013-08-01)

Abstract

The academic deanship is a unique position within a university and is one of the most difficult and misunderstood positions in higher education (Mc Daniel, Peabody J Educ 55(4):358–363, 1978; Gmelch et al., Res High Educ 40(6):717–740, 1999; Bray, J High Educ, 81(3):284–316, 2010). Cognizant of the challenging and difficult position occupied by these academic leaders, this phenomenological study has eidetically captured the collective experiences of 12 Filipino medical technology deans as they manage relationships in their organization. Driven by the central question, “What typifies Filipino medical technology deans’ portrayal of their roles as relationship managers in their institution?, a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Field texts were transcribed and subjected to phenomenological reduction via thematic analysis. Through constant comparison methods, four relational roles portrayed by Filipino medical technology deans surfaced, namely: the persona of a truth-seeker, the persona of an opportunity provider, the persona of an authoritative leader, and the persona of a reflective practitioner. The emerged role typologies which are products of the individual and collective experiences of the respondent deans provide valuable lenses in understanding the decanal role as relationship managers. On the whole, an analysis and understanding of these relational roles offer a vibrant perspective through which deanship in terms of relationship management could be viewed, thus, transcending one’s experience to meaning-making.

Keywords: Filipino medical technology deans Relational roles Collaborative mindset Phenomenology

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-012-0056-7
  References:

Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132.

Ardahaey, F. T. (2012). Human resources empowerment and its role in sustainable tourism. Asian Social Science, 8(1), 33–38.

Binney, G., Wilke, G., & Williams, C. (2009). Living leadership: A practical guide for ordinary heroes (2nd ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.

Bogue, E. G. (2006). A breakpoint moment: Leadership visions and values for trustees of collegiate mission. Innovative Higher Education, 30(5), 309–326.

Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London: Routledge.

Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and Reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 257–277.

Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31–39.

Boyd, W. L. (1999). Environmental pressures, management imperatives, and competing paradigms in educational administration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 27(3), 283–297.

Boyd, E. M., & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99–117.

Bragg, D. D. (2000). Preparing community college deans to lead change. New Directions for Community Colleges, 109, 75–85.

Bray, N. J. (2010). The deanship and its faculty interpreters: Do Mertonian norms of science translate into norms for administration? The Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 284–316.

Brown, P., Calnan, M., Scrivener, A., & Szmukler, G. (2009). Trust in mental health services: A neglected concept. Journal of Mental Health, 18(5), 449–458.

Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Chang, J. C., Hsiao, H. C., & Tu, Y. L. (2011). Besides using transformational leadership, what schools do to achieve innovation? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 48–60.

Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S., & Barua, M. (2011). Relation between human resource development climate and employee engagement: Results from India. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7(4), 664–685.

Clark, L. (2008). Clinical leadership: Values, beliefs and visions. Nursing Management, 15(7), 30–35.

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Commission on Higher Education, Memorandum Order No. 14 Series of 2006.

Congressional Commission on Education. (1993). Tertiary education, v.3. The educational ladder, Book Two. Making education work. Quezon City, Philippines: Congressional Oversight Committee on Education.

Crocker, J., & Mischkowski, D. (2008). Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive other-directed feelings. Psychological Science, 19(7), 740–747.

Crow, G., Hausman, C. S., & Scribner, J. P. (2002). Reshaping the principalship. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge (pp. 189–210). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

Day, C. (2000). Effective leadership and reflective practice. Journal of Reflective Practice, 1(1), 113–127.

Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–236.

Del Favero, M. (2006). Disciplinary variations in preparation for the academic dean role. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(3), 277–292.

Erwin, J. S. (2000). The dean as chief academic officer. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2(109), 9–17.

Ferris, R. W. (2008). The work of a dean. Evangelical Review of Theology, 32(1), 65–73.

Fineman, S. (2003). Understanding emotion at work. London: SAGE Publications.

Follett, M. (1996). The essentials of leadership. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Garber, J. S., Madigan, E. A., Click, E. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2009). Attitudes towards collaboration and servant leadership among nurses, physicians and residents. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(4), 331–340.

Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., & Sarros, J. C. (1999). The academic dean: An imperiled species searching for balance. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 717–740.

Gosling, J., & Mintzberg, H. (2003). The five minds of a manager. Harvard Business Review, 81(11), 54–63.

Graber, D. R., & Kilpatrick, A. O. (2008). Establishing value-based leadership and value systems in health care organizations. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 31(2), 179–197.

Gray, B., & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3–22.

Gupta, A. (2010). Transparency in global environmental governance: A coming of age. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 1–9.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678.

Handin, K. H., & Mancuso, J. C. (1980). Perceptions of the functions of reprimand. The Journal of Social Psychology, 110(1), 43–52.

Hargreaves, A. (2002). Teaching and betrayal: Teachers and teaching. Theory and Practice, 8(3), 393–407.

Harms, P. D., Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2007). Who shall lead? An integrative personality approach to the study of the antecedents of status in informal social organizations. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 689–699.

Hartley, D. (2010). Paradigms: How far does research in distributed leadership ‘stretch’? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(3), 271–285.

Hodson, J. B. (2010). Leading the way: The role of presidents and academic deans in fundraising. New Directions for Higher Education, 4(149), 39–49.

Hollander, E. (2009). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader–follower relationship. New York, NY: Routledge.

Holloman, H. L., Rouse, W. A., & Farrington, V. (2007). Purpose-driven leadership: Defining, defending and sustaining a school’s purpose. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(4), 437–443.

Huet, S., & Deffuant, G. (2010). Openness leads to opinion stability and narrowness to volatility. Advances in Complex Systems, 13(3), 405–423.

James, K. T., Mann, J., & Greasy, J. (2007). Leaders as lead learners: A case example of facilitating collaborative leadership learning for school leaders. Management Learning, 38(1), 79–94.

Jocano, F. L. (1999). Towards developing a Filipino corporate culture. Manila, Philippines: Punlad Research House Inc.

Kaiser, R. B., & Overfield, D. V. (2010). The leadership value chain. The Psychological Manager Journal, 13(3), 164–183.

Kean, S., Haycock-Stuart, E., & Baggaley, S. (2011). Followers and the co-construction of leadership. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(4), 507–516.

Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative biographical study on teacher socialization. Teacher and Teacher Education, 18(1), 105–120.

Knight, S. (2002). NLP at work: The difference that makes a difference in business (2nd ed.). London: Nicholas Brealey.

Lai, C. S., Chen, C. S., Chiu, C. J., & Pai, D. C. (2011). The impact of trust on the relationship between inter-organisational collaboration and product innovation performance. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 23(1), 65–74.

Laschinger, H., & Finegan, J. (2005). Using empowerment to build trust and respect in the workplace: A strategy for addressing the nursing shortage. Nursing Economics, 23(1), 6–12.

Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32(6), 991–1022.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8(1), 1–24.

Mc Daniel, T. R. (1978). On the dean and his office: Reflections of a department chairman. Peabody Journal of Education, 55(4), 358–363.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to Experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Mendenhall, M. E., & Marsh, J. (2010). Voices From the Past: Mary Parker Follett and Joseph Smith on Collaborative Leadership. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4), 284–303.

Mol, A. P. J. (2010). The future of transparency: Power, pitfalls and promises. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 132–143.

Morris, V. C. (1981). Deaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Murnigham, J. K., & Leung, T. K. (1976). The effects of leadership involvement and the importance of the task on subordinates’ performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17(2), 299–310.

Murphy, K. C. (1980). A cognitive behavioral approach to client anxiety, anger, depression, and guilt. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 59(4), 202–205.

Pastor, J. (1996). Empowerment: What it is and what it is not. Empowerment in Organizations, 4(2), 5–7.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and evaluation methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Raelin, J. A. (2006). “I don’t have time to think!” versus the art of reflective practice. Reflections, 4(1), 66–75.

Rosser, V., Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (2003). Academic deans and directors: Assessing their effectiveness from individual and institutional perspectives. Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 1–25.

Rus, A., & Iglič, H. (2005). Trust, governance and performance: The role of institutional and interpersonal trust in SME development. International Sociology, 20(3), 371–391.

Sarros, J. C., Gmelch, W. H., & Tanewski, G. A. (1998). The academic dean: A position in need of a compass and clock. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(1), 65–88.

Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183–242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Singh, A., & Purohit, B. (2011). Leadership for education in India: The dean’s role. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(2), 251–255.

Stoeckel, P. R., & Davies, T. G. (2007). Reflective leadership by selected community college presidents. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(11), 895–912.

Thomas, H., & Fragueiro, F. (2011). The dean’s many roles. Journal of BizEd., 10(3), 54–59.

Wojnar, D.M. & Swanson, K.M. (2007). Phenomenology: An exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172–180.

Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W., Montez, J., & Nies, C. (2001). The changing nature of academic deanship. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Yin, H., Lee, J. C., & Jin, Y. (2011). Teacher receptivity to curriculum reform and the need for trust. An exploratory study from Southwest China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 35–47.

Young, L.C. & Wilkinson, I.F. (1989). The role of trust and cooperation in marketing channels: A preliminary study. European Journal of Marketing, 23(2), 109–122.

  Cited by:
     None...