The measurement of willingness to communicate (WTC) in a second language (L2) has been pervasive in quantitative research particularly in the context of structural equation modeling. An important prerequisite for this line of research is to establish the psychometric properties of the instrument used to measure L2 WTC. This study involves measuring WTC in the Chinese context where English is learned as a foreign language (EFL), and identifying the factor structure underlying the L2 WTC scale adopted from the literature. Questionnaire data were collected from 1,013 university undergraduate students. An exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were respectively performed on random split-half samples. The results indicate that the participants reporting WTC in classroom situations outnumbered those expressing WTC in out-of-class situations. A two-factor structure of WTC was identified to adequately represent the data: WTC inside and outside the classroom. This paper concludes with a discussion of the results, caveats and implications for measuring WTC in EFL contexts.
Keywords: Willingness to communicate Psychometric properties English as a foreign language Exploratory factor analysis Confirmatory factor analysisAsker, B. (1998). Student reticence and oral testing: a Hong Kong study of willingness to communicate. Communication Research Reports, 15(2), 162–169.
Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2), 311–341.
Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459–472.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468–479.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in the whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493.
Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28, 435–446.
Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190–209.
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40(1), 46–78.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non-English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 197–211.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29–70.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Kunnan, A. J. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modelling for language assessment research. Language Testing, 15(3), 295–332.
Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71–86.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576.
MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clément, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: antecedents and consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 215–229.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537–564.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589–607.
MacIntyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: a qualitative study of French immersion students’ willingness to communicate. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 81–96.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3–26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: communication, control, and concern (pp. 101–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Peng, J. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 2, 33–59.
Peng, J., & Woodrow, L. J. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876.
Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 120–143). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Shi, L. (2006). The successors to Confucianism or a new generation? A questionnaire study on Chinese students’ culture of learning English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 122–126.
Weaver, C. (2005). Using the Rasch model to develop a measure of second language learners’ willingness to communicate within a language classroom. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(4), 396–415.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: the Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.
Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 144–192). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152.
Yu, W., & Lin, M. (2004). Shuigang gaoxiao xuesheng yingyu jiaoliu yiyuan duibi yanjiu [Willingness to communicate: a comparative study of Guangdong and Hong Kong Chinese learners of English in higher education]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 36, 219–223.