Measuring Singaporean Students’ Motivation and Strategies of Bilingual Learning

Article Details

Wenli Chen, , Department of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University,
Lung-Hsiang Wong, Ching-Sing Chai,, nan, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Chee-Kuen Chin, , National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 22 Issue 3 (Published: 2013-08-01)

Abstract

This paper reports a pilot study on the development and validation of the bilingual (Chinese and English) “Motivation and Attitudes for Language Learning Inventory” (MALLI). MALLI is designed to measure secondary school students’ learning motivations, and several other factors in the learning of both Chinese and English languages. We adapted relevant subscales from “Motivation and Strategies in Learning Questionnaire” and “Chinese Language Classroom Environment Inventory” to create the MALLI (Chinese) and MALLI (English) versions to investigate the factors with reference to Chinese and English learning respectively. Both instruments contain the same set of items with reference to Chinese and English learning correspondingly. After going through initial validation, the instruments were administered to 318 students from various secondary schools in Singapore. Exploratory Factor Analysis resulted in the selection of 33 items from six identified subscales: intrinsic value, extrinsic goal orientation, self-efficacy, study management, teacher support (TS), and ICT for learning (ICT). To demonstrate how the questionnaire can be applied to compare the students’ perceptions related to learning of the two languages, a series of paired t tests was performed on the questionnaire data. It was found that there are significant differences in the students’ perceptions on TS and ICT in the learning of both languages. We discussed the implications of the findings at the end of the paper.

Keywords: Bilingual learning Learning motivation Learning attitudes

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-012-0032-2
  References:

Alsagoff, L. (2010). English in Singapore: Culture, capital and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes, 29(3), 336–348.

Bokhorst-Heng, W. D., & Caleon, I. S. (2009). The language attitudes of bilingual youth in multilingual Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(3), 235–251.

Chinese Language Curriculum and Pedagogy Review Committee (CLCPRC). (2004). Report of the Chinese language curriculum and pedagogy review committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

Chua, S. L., Wong, A. F. L., & Chen, V. (2009). Association between Chinese language classroom environments and students’ motivation to learn the language. Australian Journal of Educational Developmental Psychology, 9, 53–64.

Crede, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337–346.

Dixon, L. Q. (2005). Bilingual education policy in Singapore: An analysis of its sociohistorical roots and current academic outcomes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(1), 25–47.

Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Researching motivation: From integrativeness to the ideal L2 self. In S. Hunston & D. Oakey (Eds.), Introducing applied linguistics: Concepts and skills (pp. 74–83). London, UK: Routledge.

Du, H., & Crestani, F. (2005). Spoken versus written queries for mobile information access: An experiment on Mandarin Chinese. In K. Y. Y. Yu, J. Tsuji, J. H. Lee, & O. Y. Kwong (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Natural language processing IJCNLP 2004 (pp. 745–754). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaires. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128.

Garcia, O. (2009). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a name? TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 322–326.

Hardré, P. L., Davis, K. A., & Sullivan, D. W. (2008). Measuring teacher perceptions of the “how” and “why” of student motivation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(2), 155–179.

Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205.

Huang, I. T. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1997). The development of a questionnaire for assessing student perception of teaching environments in Taiwan and Australia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago.

Liu, E. Z.-F., & Lin, C.-H. (2010). The survey study of mathematics motivated strategies for learning questionnaires (MMSLQ) for grade 10–12 Taiwanese students. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 221–233.

MacIntyre, P. D., MacMaster, K., & Baker, S. C. (2001). The convergence of multiple models of motivation for second language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report #23) (pp. 461–492). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Ong, Y. P. (2002). Chinese language, culture and teaching. Singapore: Xishan Wenyi Zhongxin.

Pavlou, V. (2006). Pre-adolescents’ perceptions of competence, motivation and engagement in art activities. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(2), 194–204.

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Rao, N., & Sachs, J. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Chinese version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(6), 1016–1029.

Rotgans, J. L., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: A measure for students’ general motivational beliefs and learning strategies? Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(2), 357–369.

Shen, H. H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese-character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33(1), 49–68.

Soh, K. C. (1993). Measuring motivation to learn Chinese and English through self-reported feelings and behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 13(1), 88–94.

Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37(1), 1–21.

Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Sciences, 26(1–2), 27–47.

Wong, L.-H., Chai, C.-S., & Gao, P. (2011a). The Chinese input challenges for Chinese as second language learners in computer mediated writing: An exploratory study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 233–248.

Wong, L.-H., Gao, P., Chai, C.-S., & Chin, C.-K. (2011b). Where research, practice and authority meet: A collaborative inquiry for development of technology-enhanced Chinese language curricula. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 232–243.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 185–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Cited by: