The Effects of College Students’ In-Class and After-Class Lecture Note-Taking on Academic Performance

Article Details

Pin-Hwa Chen, nan, National Pingtung University of Education, Pingtung, Taiwan

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 22 Issue 2 (Published: 2013-05-01)

Abstract

This study used a lesson unit of an academic subject to understand the quantity and quality of college students’ in-class and after-class lecture notes, and to explore the effects of note quantity and quality on academic performance. Thirty-eight freshmen students of a general psychology class in a university in southern Taiwan were recruited as participants. Their lecture notes and test scores on the lesson “Memory” were collected. The findings indicated that the quality of students’ lecture notes was poor. The quality level of in-class plus after-class notes was less than half the desired overall quality. In addition, both the in-class predictive model and in-class plus after-class predictive model could explain the variances of academic performance. In both models, the quality of in-class notes was the only significant predictor of academic performance.

Keywords: Lecture note-taking Academic performance College students

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-012-0010-8
  References:

Austin, J. L., Lee, M., & Carr, J. P. (2004). The effects of guided notes on undergraduate students’ recording of lecture content. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(4), 314–320.

Baker, L., & Lombardi, B. R. (1985). Students’ lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 28–32.

Bonner, J. M., & Holliday, W. G. (2006). How college science students engage in note-taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 786–818.

Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1979). Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 145–153.

Carter, J. F., & Van Matre, N. H. (1975). Note taking versus note having. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(6), 900–904.

Castello, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool. Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5, 265–285.

Cukras, G. G. (2006). The investigation of study strategies that maximize learning for underprepared students. College Teaching, 54(1), 194–197.

Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8–14.

Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1973). Listening and note taking II: Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 278–287.

Dyson, B. J. (2008). Assessing small-scale interventions in large-scale teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 265–282.

Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 522–532.

Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321–325.

Gee, K. L. (2011). The impact of instructor-provided lecture notes and learning interventions on student note-taking and generative processing. Thesis of San Jose State University, California, USA.

Isaacs, G. (1994). Lecturing practices and note-taking purposes. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 203–216.

Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O., & Canny, J. (2005). Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. In Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 531–540). New York: ACM.

Katayama, A. D., & Crooks, S. M. (2003). Online notes: Differential effects of studying complete or partial graphically organized notes. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(4), 293–312.

Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Providing instructor’s notes: An effective addition to student note-taking. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 33–39.

Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172.

Kiewra, K. A. (1997). Learning to learn: Making the transition form student to life-long learner. London: Allyn and Bacon.

Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 242–262.

Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 459–477.

Kuo, C. L. (2011). The relationship between learning motivation and lecture note-taking among college students. Thesis of the Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling. National Pingtung University of Education, Taiwan.

McDonald, R. J., & Taylor, E. G. (1980). Student note-taking and lecture handouts in veterinary medical education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 7, 157–161.

Morales, J. D. (2004). An improved tool for taking class notes in the classroom. Thesis of University of Texas at El Paso, Texas, USA.

Palmatier, R. A., & Bennett, J. M. (1974). Note Taking habits of college students. Journal of Reading, 18, 215–218.

Pauk, W. (1974). How to study in college. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 34–38.

Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 167–180.

Plaue, C., LaMarca, S., & Funk, S. H. (2012). Group note-taking in a large lecture class. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 227–232). New York: ACM.

Raver, S. A., & Maydosz, A. S. (2010). Impact of the provision and timing of instructor-provided notes on university students’ learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 189–200.

Risch, N. L., & Kiewra, K. A. (1990). Content and form variations in note taking. Journal of Educational Research, 83(6), 355–357.

Shieh, R. S., Chang, W., & Tang, J. (2010). The impact of implementing technology-enabled active learning (TEAL) in university physics. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 19(3), 401–415.

Smith, E. E., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, B. L., & Loftus, G. R. (2009). Atkinson’s and Hilgards’ introduction to psychology (15th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.

Titsworth, B. S., & Kiewra, K. A. (2004). Spoken organizational lecture cues and student note taking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 447–461.

Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 323–338.

Weiland, A., & Kingsbury, S. J. (2001). Immediate and delayed recall of lecture material as a function of note taking. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 228–230.

  Cited by:
     None...