Teaching and Learning Electricity—A Study on Students’ and Science Teachers’ Common Misconceptions

Article Details

Bingo L. Aligo; Regine L. Branzuela, jetro_d_gardon@dlsu.edu.ph, Science Education Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Christine Ann G. Faraon; Jetro D. Gardon, , Science Education Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Antriman V. Orleans, , Science Education Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines

Journal: Manila Journal of Science
Volume 14 Issue 1 (Published: 2021-01-01)

Abstract

The presence of misconceptions about electricity among students can hinder learning it, more so if the science teachers themselves have these misconceptions. This study aimed to determine the most common misconceptions about electricity among students and science teachers to shed light on this problem. The study utilized a descriptive research design involving the administration of the Simple Electric Circuit Diagnostic Test (SECDT), a written test to survey the students and teachers’ misconceptions about electricity, and a semi structured interview of students to confirm the results of this test. Based on the results, students and science teachers share some common models of misconceptions about electricity like the clashing current, shared current, current flow as water flow, short circuit, and local reasoning models. In addition, the paper found out that students and science teachers manifested a lack of knowledge on many SECDT items. Results of the interview confirmed consistency in the answers of the students in the test. The researchers recommend using different strategies to improve the students’ and teachers’ conceptual understanding of electricity to address these misconceptions and lack of knowledge.

Keywords: electricity, lack of knowledge, misconceptions, misconception models, SECDT

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/research/journals/mjs/MJS14-2021/issue-1/MJS14-3-2021-gardon-et-al.pdf
  References:

Bernardo, J. (2020). PH ranks last among 58 countries in Grade 4 math, science: Study. ABS-CBN News. Retrieved from https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/12/09/20/ph-ranks-last-among-58-countries-in-grade-4-math-science-study

Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 107–123.

Cibik, A. (2016). Determining science teacher candidates’ academic knowledge and misconceptions about electric current. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 1061–1090.

DepEd. (2013). K to 12 curriculum guide – science (Grade 3 to Grade 10). Pasig, Metro Manila, Philippines: Department of Education.

DepEd. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order no. 8, series of 2015). Pasig, Metro Manila, Philippines: Department of Education.

Fluet, B. (2021). What is descriptive research? Retrieved from https://invoke.com/blog/what-is-descriptive-research

Fredette, N. H., & Clement, J. J. (1981). Student misconceptions of an electric circuit: What do they mean? Journal of College Science Teaching, 10, 280–285.

Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316–1325.

Kaltakci, D., & Didis, N. (2007). Identification of pre-service physics teachers` misconceptions on gravity concept: A study with a 3-tier misconception test. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, 499–500.

Onder, F., Senyigit, C., & Silay, I. (2017). The effects of misconception on pre-service teachers’ ability to construct simple electric circuits. European Journal of Physics Education, 8(1), 1–10.

Orbe, J., Espinosa, A., & Datukan, J. (2018). Teaching chemistry in a spiral progression: Lessons from science teachers in the Philippines. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 17–30.

Pesman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2009). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 208–222.

Samsudin, A., Azura, Kaniawati, I., Suhandi, A., Fratiwi, N., Supriyatman, Wobowo, F., Malik, A., & Costu, B. (2018). Unveiling students’ misconceptions through computer simulation-based PDEODE learning strategy on dynamic electricity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280, 1–8.

Sencar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninth-grade Turkish students’ misconceptions concerning electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 603–616.

Turgut, U., Gurbuz, F., & Turgut, G. (2011). An investigation of 10th grade students’ misconceptions about electric current. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1965–1971.

Widodo, W., Rosdiana, L., Fauziah, A., & Suryanti. (2018). Revealing student’s multiple-misconception on electric circuits. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 1–6.

Wijaya, C., Supriyono Koes, H., & Muhardjito. (2016). The diagnosis of senior high school class X MIA B students` misconceptions about hydrostatic pressure concept using three-tier. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 14–21.

  Cited by:
     None...