Replicator Analysis of Unblocked Pyramid Game

Article Details

Ederlina G. Nocon, , Mathematics Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Karen P. Nocum, karen.nocum@g.batstate-u.edu.ph, Mathematics and Statistics Department, De La Salle University, Manila

Journal: Manila Journal of Science
Volume 13 Issue 2 (Published: 2020-01-01)

Abstract

We introduce a sequential game called a pyramid game, which models a known business scheme that lets players choose between low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) investment in order to reach their highest possible payoffs where decisions are made by one player after another. The analysis of the unblocked game shows the existence of Nash equilibria. Treating it as a population game, we use the notion of replicator dynamics of evolutionary game theory (EGT) to observe the evolutionary dynamics of the game. Using the EGT approach, it was found out that an asymptotic stable Nash equilibrium occurs when the stopping point 𝑇 is even in which all players choose an HR move. This value refers to the number of periods or instances when players make investment decisions, which also signifies the end of the game. Results also suggest that in a pyramid game, an individual’s successful strategy is imitated by other players in the population.

Keywords: evolutionary games, sequential games, replicator dynamics, unblocked games,stability

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/research/journals/mjs/MJS13-2020/volume-2/MJS13-10-2021-nocum-et-al.pdf
  References:

Abbass, H., Greenwood, G., & Petraki, E. (2018). The N−player trust game and its replicator dynamics.

IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 20(3), 470−474. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2015.2484840

Alcantara, J., Lao, R., & Ruivivar, L. (2016). Stability analysis of the ODE model representation of amyloidogenic processing in Alzheimer’s disease in the presence of SORLA. Molecular BioSystems, 12(5), 1468−1477. Binmore, K. (1987). Modeling rational players: Part I. Economics and Philosophy, 3(2), 179−214. doi:10.1017/S0266267100002893

Binmore, K. (1988). Modeling rational players: Part II. Economics and Philosophy, 4(1), 9−55.

doi:10.1017/S0266267100000328

Broom, M., & Rychtar, J. (2016). Evolutionary games with sequential decisions and dollar auctions. Dynamic Games Applications, 8(2018), 211−231. Cressman, R. (1992). The stability concept of evolutionary game theory: A dynamic approach. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-49981-4

Cressman, R. (2003). Evolutionary dynamics and extensive form games (vol. 5). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Evolutionary game theory. In the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ game-evolutionary/HisDev

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetic theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon

Press.

Friedman, D. (1998). On economic applications of evolutionary game theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8, 15−43.

Fudenberg, D., & Levine, D. (1997). The theory of learning in games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gokhale, C., & Traulsen, A. (2011). Strategy abundance in evolutionary many player games with multiple strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 283(1), 180−191.

Gokhale, C., & Traulsen, A. (2010). Evolutionary games in the multiverse. PNAS,

107(12), 5500−5504. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/cgi/10.1073/pnas. 0912214107

Grune-Yanoff, T. (2011a). Models as products of interdisciplinary exchange: Evidence from evolutionary game theory. The Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42(2), 386−397.

doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.12.004. Grune-Yanoff, T. (2011b). Evolutionary

game theory, interpersonal comparisons and natural selection: A dilemma.

Springer Science+Business Media, 26, 637-654. doi:10.1007/s10539-011-9273-3

Hoda, S., Gilpin, A., Peña, J., & Sandholm, T. (2010). Smoothing techniques for competing Nash equilibria of sequential games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 35(2), 495−512.

Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1988). The theory of evolution and dynamical systems: Mathematical aspects of selection. Cambridge University Press.

Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge: University Press.

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173179 Kohler, D., & Chandrasekaran, R. (1971). A class of sequential games. Operations Research, 9(2), 270−277. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1692267 Kohli, I., & Haslam, M. (2017). An analysis of the replicator dynamics for an asymmetric hawk-dove game. Hindawi International Journal of Differential Equations, 2017, 1−7. doi:10.1155/2017/8781570

Lewontin, R. (1961). Evolution and the theory of games. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1, 382−403. doi:10.1016/0022- 5193(61)90038-8

Maliath, G. (1998). Do people play Nash equilibrium? Lessons from evolutionary game theory Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1347−1374. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564802

Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). The theory of games and economic behavior. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Samuelson, L., & Zhang, J. (1992). Evolutionary stability in asymmetric games. Journal of Economic Theory, 57,363−391.

Schuster, P., Hofbauer, J., & Wolf, R. (1981).Self Regulation of behavior in animal societies. Biological Cybernetics, 40, 9−15.

Siegrist, K., & Steele, J. (2001). Sequential games. Journal of Applied Probability, 38(4), 1006−1017.

Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, J., & Price, G. (1973). The logic of animal conflict Nature, 246, 15−18. doi:10.1038/246015a0

Venkateswaran, V., & Gokhale, C. (2019) Evolutionary dynamics of complex multiple games. Proceedings

Royal Society B, 286, 20190900. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.0900

Wenn, Q. (2002). A folk theorem for repeated sequential games. The Review of Economic Studies,

69(2), 493−513. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1556740 Weibull, J. (1995). Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Cited by:
     None...