The article explores some views from the Catholic Church regarding artificial intelligence (AI). It covers the following: 1) a description of the development of AI and the ethical issues raised by it; 2) an overview of the ethical considerations of the Catholic Church through a survey of three events and two documents in relation to AI; 3) an interpretative commentary; and 4) an attempt to offer a Christological-ethical reflection on AI.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence • Catholic Church • Ethics • Technology1) Anderson, Michael, and Susan Anderson. “Machine Ethics: Creating an Ethical Intelligent Agent,” AI Magazine Vol. 28, no. 4, (2007): 15-25.
2) Awad, Mariette, and Rahul Khanna. “Machine Learning.” Essay. In Efficient Learning Machines: Theories, Concepts, and Applications for Engineers and System Designers, 1–268. Berkeley, CA: Apress Open, 2015; https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9#about (accessed 16 June 2021.).
3) Commission des Episcopats de la Communauté Européenne, “Robotisation of Life - Ethics in view of new challenges, ” January 2019, http://www.comece.eu/comece-publishes-reflection-on-robotisation-of-life.
4) Commission des Episcopats de la Communauté Européenne, “Annex to the public consultation on the White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European Approach,” June 2020, http://www.comece.eu/dl/kmsNJKJKkKoOJqx4KJK/COMECE-contribution-and-annex_paper_for_the_public_consultation_on_the_White_Paper_on_AI-final.pdf.
5) Chalmers, David. “The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 17/9-10 (2010): 7-65.
6) BBC. “Deepfake Queen Prompts 200-plus Complaints to Ofcom.” BBC News. BBC, December 29, 2020. Last modified December 29, 2020; https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55478579 (accessed 31 March 2021).
7) Benanti, Paolo. “Artificial Intelligence, Robots, Bio-engineering, and Cyborgs: New Challenges for Theology?” Concilium (2019/3): 34-48.
8) Brooks, Rodney. “Elephants Don`t Play Chess.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 6, no. 1-2 (June 1990): 3–15; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921889005800259 (accessed 16 June 2021).
9) Buchanan, Bruce G. “A (Very) Brief History of Artificial Intelligence.” AI Magazine 26, no. 4 (December 2005): 53–60.
10) Einhorn, Bruce, Siegfrid Alegado, and Ditas B Lopez. “Empathetic Robots Are Killing Off the World’s Call-Center Industry.” Bloomberg. Bloomberg, March 17, 2021. Last modified March 17, 2021; https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-16/artificial-intelligence-chatbots-threaten-call-center-industry-human-operators (accessed 31 March 2021).
11) Duffé, Bruno-Marie, “Introductory Reflections: ‘“Digital Age”: The Paradoxical Culture of Process and the Instantaneous,’” Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development https://www.humandevelopment.va/content/dam/sviluppoumano/eventi/digitalage19/MsgrBMDuffe_DigitalAge19_eng.pdf.
12) Fitzpatrick F, Doherty A, Lacey G. Using Artificial Intelligence in Infection Prevention. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 19:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40506-020-00216-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32218708; PMCID: PMC7095094.
13) Francis, “Address of His Holiness Pope Francis to the participants in the seminar ‘The Common Good in the digital age’ Organized by the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development and the Pontifical Council of Culture” 27 September 2019, Vatican Archives, https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2019/september/documents/papa-francesco_20190927_eradigitale.html.
14) Francis, “Address Prepared by Pope Francis Read by HE Archbishop Paglia President of the Pontifical Academy of Life,” 28 February 2020, Vatican Archives, http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2020/february/documents/papa-francesco_20200228_accademia-perlavita.html.
15) Francis, “On care for our common home,” Laudato SI’ no. 106, 24 May 2015, Vatican Archives, https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html#_ftn53.
16) Garnelo, Marta, and Murray Shanahan. “Reconciling Deep Learning with Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Representing Objects and Relations.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 29 (October 2019): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.010.
17) Gaudium et Spes. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World. Vatican Archives, https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html.
18) Göcke, Benedikt Paul. “The Ideals of Humanity in light of Synthetic Biology and Artificial Intelligence,” Concilium, (2019/3): 25-33.
19) Goertzel, Ben. “Artificial General Intelligence: Concept, State of the Art, and Future Prospects.” Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 5, no. 1 (2014): 1–46. https://doi.org/ 10.2478/jagi-2014-0001.
20) Grygiel, Wojciech P. “Artificial Intelligence and Scholastic Epistemology.” Annales UMCS Informatica AI 3 (2005): 93–103; http://ai/annales.umcs.pl (accessed 26 June 2021).
21) Gugerty, Leo. “Newell and Simon`s Logic Theorist: Historical Background and Impact on Cognitive Modeling.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50/9 (October 1, 2006): 880–884.
22) Gunkel, David J. The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. Camb ridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.
23) Ho, Anita. “Are We Ready for Artificial Intelligence Health Monitoring in Elder Care?” BMC Geriatrics 20/358 (2020): 1-7.
24) Manzotti, Riccardo, “Embodied AI beyond Embodied Cognition and Enactivism” Philosophies 4/3 (16 July 2019): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4030039.
25) McCarthy, John. “History of Lisp.” Professor John McCarthy. Stanford University, February 12, 1979. Last modified February 12, 1979; http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/lisp.html (accessed 1 April 2021).
26) McCarthy, John “What Is Artificial Intelligence?” What Is Artificial Intelligence? (Stanford, 2007). http://jmc.stanford.edu/artificial-intelligence/what-is-ai/index.html (accessed 1 April 2021).
27) Naude, Wim, and Nicola Dimitri. “The Race for an Artificial General Intelligence: Implications for Public Policy.” AI and Society 35 (April 22, 2019): 367–379; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-019-00887-x (accessed 16 June 2021).
28) Nouri, Steve. “Council Post: How AI Is Making An Impact On The Surveillance World.” Forbes. Forbes Magazine, December 3, 2020. Last modified December 3, 2020; https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/12/04/how-ai-is-making-an-impact-on-the-surveillance-world/?sh=22a93632265e (accessed 31 March 2021).
29) Osiński, Grzegorz. “Theological and Ethical Aspects of Mind Transfer in Transhumanism.” Scientia et Fides 9/1 (2021): 149–176.
30) Pontifical Academy of Science, “Statement on Artificial Intelligence” 1 December 2016, http://www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/scripta_varia_132.pdf.
31) Samuel, Arthur L. “Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers,” IBM Journal of Research and Development 44/1.2 (1959): 210–229.
32) Searle, John. R. “Minds, brains, and programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3/3 (1980): 417-457.
33) Scharre, Paul, and Michael Horowitz. “Artificial Intelligence What Every Policymaker Needs to Know.” Center for New American Security. Center for a New American Security, June 19, 2018. Last modified June 19, 2018; https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/artificial-intelligence-what-every-policymaker-needs-to-know (accessed 31 March 2021).
34) Scheutz, Matthias. “Artificial Emotions and Machine Consciousness.” In Keith Frankish and William M. Ramsey, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, 247-266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
35) Sinibaldi, Edoardo, Chris Gastmans, Miguel Yáñez, Richard M Lerner, László Kovács, Carlo Casalone, Renzo Pegoraro, and Vincenzo Paglia. “Contributions from the Catholic Church to Ethical Reflections in the Digital Era.” Nature Machine Intelligence 2/5 (May 11, 2020): 242–244.
36) Skansi, Sandro. “Preface.” Preface. In Introduction to Deep Learning from Logical Calculus to Artificial Intelligence, i-xiii. Springer, 2018.
37) Song, Yong Sup. “Religious AI as an Option to the Risks of Superintelligence: A Protestant Theological Perspective,” Theology and Science 19/1 (October 6, 2020): 65-78.
38) Teich, David A. “Artificial Intelligence and Data Privacy – Turning A Risk Into A Benefit.” Forbes. Forbes, August 10, 2020. Last modified August 10, 2020; https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidteich/2020/08/10/artificial-intelligence-and-data-privacy--turning-a-risk-into-a-benefit/?sh=1c79e43c6a95 (accessed 31 March 2021).
39) The United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
40) Turing, Alan M. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59/236 (October 1950): 433–460.
41) Turkson, Peter A.,“Welcome Greetings,” Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, 26 September 2019, https://www.humandevelopment.va/content/dam/sviluppoumano/eventi/digitalage19/26-09-2019%20Common%20good%20Digital%20age%20welcome.pdf.
42) Willingham, AJ. “A New Program Can Animate Old Photos. But There`s Nothing Human about Artificial Intelligence.” CNN Business. CNN Worldwide, March 5, 2021. Last modified March 5, 2021; https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/02/business/deep-nostalgia-myhertiage-ai-learning-trnd/index.html (accessed 31 March 2021).
43) Winston, Patrick Henry. “Marvin L. Minsky (1927–2016).” Nature 530/7590 (February 18, 2016): 282.
44) Yampolskiy, Roman, and Joshua Fox. “Safety Engineering for Artificial General Intelligence.” Topoi 32/2 (August 24, 2012): 217–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9128-9.
45) “DeepFake.” In the Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge University Press; https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/deepfake (accessed 23 June 2021).
46) “History of Artificial Intelligence.” Artificial Intelligence. Council of Europe, n.d.; https://www.coe.int/web/artificial-intelligence/home (accessed 31 March 2021).
47) “Rome Call For AI Ethics – A Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence” Rome Call For AI Ethics’ https://www.romecall.org/ (accessed 31 March 2021).
48) “The Common Good in the Digital Age (26-28 September 2019).” Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development; https://www.humandevelopment.va/en/eventi/2019/the-common-good-in-the-digital-age-25-27-settembre-2019.html (accessed 1 April 2021).