Understanding Interpersonal Meaning-Making in Chinese High School Students’ ESL Writing: A Systemic Functional Perspective

Article Details

Wenhui Xuan,, nan, Hong Kong Community College, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, 00852, China
Xue’e Huang, , Hong Kong Community College, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, 00852, China

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 26 Issue 5 (Published: 2017-10-01)

Abstract

Drawing on the framework of Modality from systemic functional linguistics, the present study aimed to explore adolescent ESL learners’ interpersonal meaning-making. Data were collected from 10 writing tasks completed by a group of 50 adolescent ESL learners in China. Functional text analysis was utilized to analyze the data, including Modality types, orientation, value, and polarity. The finding revealed that overuse of certain types of modal verbs is common in Chinese ESL learners’ writing, for instance, the case of “can”. Most of the modality deployed was simple and congruent. In conclusion, systematic introduction of Modality and the provision of more contexts for learners to practice them are highly recommended in such a context.

Keywords: Modality Chinese high school learners ESL writing Systemic functional linguistics

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-017-0343-4
  References:

Basham, C., & Kwachka, P. (1989). Variation in modal use by Alaskan Eskimo student writers. Variation in Second Language Acquisition, 1, 129–143.

Bassano, D. (1996). Functional and formal constraints on the emergence of epistemic modality: A longitudinal study on French. First Language, 16(46), 077–113.

Bublitz, W. (1992). Transferred negation and modality. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(6), 551–577.

Chen, Y. (2010). The semiotic construal of attitudinal curriculum goals: Evidence from EFL textbooks in China. Linguistics and Education, 21(1), 60–74.

Choi, S. (1995). Early acquisition of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (Eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse (pp. 165–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2010). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. A&C Black.

Coates, J. (1988). The acquisition of the meanings of modality in children aged eight and twelve. Journal of Child Language, 15(02), 425–434.

Coffin, C. (2006). Learning the language of school history: The role of linguistics in mapping the writing demands of the secondary school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 413–429.

Dewaele, J. M., & Pavlenko, A. (2002). Emotion vocabulary in interlanguage. Language learning, 52(2), 263–322.

Gibbons, J., & Markwick-Smith, V. (1992). Exploring the use of a systemic semantic description. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 36–49.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.

Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 125–140.

Hinkel, E. (1995). The use of model verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 325–343. doi:10.2307/3587627.

Hinkel, E. (2009). The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 667–683.

Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied linguistics, 9(1), 21–44.

Izutsu, K., & Izutsu, M. N. (2013) From discourse markers to modal/final particles. In Degand, L., Cornillie, B., & Pietrandrea, P. (Eds.) Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and description (pp. 217–236). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Leech, G. (2003). Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992. Topics in English Linguistics, 44, 223–240.

Liardét, C. L. (2013). An exploration of Chinese EFL learner’s deployment of grammatical metaphor: Learning to make academically valued meanings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 161–178.

Matthiessen, C., Teruya, K., & Lam, M. (2010). Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. London: A&C Black.

Noveck, I. A., Ho, S., & Sera, M. (1996). Children’s understanding of epistemic modals. Journal of Child Language, 23(03), 621–643.

Painter, C. (2003). Developing attitude: An ontogenetic perspective on APPRAISAL. Text—Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 23(2), 183–209.

Perkins, M. R. (1983). Modal expressions in English. London: Burns & Oates.

Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 243–256.

Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H. (2013). Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 179–197.

Sheperd, S. (1993). The acquisition of modality in antiguan creole. In Modality in language acquisition / Modalité et acquisition des langues (pp. 171–184). Berlin, Boston: DE GRUYTER. Retrieved 14 Jun 2017, from http://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110856996/9783110856996.171/9783110856996.171.xml.

Smoczyn’ska, M. (1993). The acquisition of polish modal verbs. In Modality in language acquisition / Modalité et acquisition des langues (pp. 145–170). Berlin, Boston: DE GRUYTER. Retrieved 14 Jun 2017, from http://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110856996/9783110856996.145/9783110856996.145.xml.

Stephany, U. (1993). Modality in first language acquisition: The state of the Art. In Modality in Language Acquisition / Modalité et acquisition des langues (pp. 133–144). Berlin, Boston: DE GRUYTER. Retrieved 14 Jun. 2017, from http://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110856996/9783110856996.133/9783110856996.133.xml.

Swain, E. (2010) Getting engaged: Dialogistic positioning in novice academic discussion writing. In E. Swain (Ed), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialized discourses (pp. 291–317). Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.

Torr, J. (1998). The development of modality in the pre-school years: Language as a vehicle for understanding possibilities and obligations in everyday life. Functions of Language, 5(2), 157–178.

Xuan, W. W. (2017). An exploratory study of ESL writing by junior secondary students in China: Text type, register and textual features. Functional Linguistics, 4(1), 3.

  Cited by:
     None...