In many settings a perplexing scenario is unfolding in which school systems claim to move towards whole-person development while students and parents run in the opposite direction of narrowly defined academic achievement enhanced by private supplementary tutoring. Such tutoring is widely called shadow education because much of its content mimics that of regular schooling. It has long been clearly visible in Asia, and is now increasingly visible elsewhere. This study focuses on school teachers’ perceptions of shadow education in the context of a flourishing sector that parallels and to some extent contradicts progressive education reforms. Drawing on 47 in-depth interviews with teachers from 12 secondary schools in Hong Kong, the research found ambivalent views towards private tutoring. This ambivalence reflected intrinsic contradictions between the educational ideals of whole-person development and the function of schooling in social stratification. Such tensions are likely to become increasingly evident elsewhere as commercialised forms of private supplementary tutoring expand.
Keywords: Private tutoring Shadow education Teachers’ perceptions Whole-person development Social stratificationAltinyelken, H. K. (2013). The demand for private tutoring in Turkey: Challenges and policy implications. In M. Bray, A. E. Mazawi, & R. G. Sultana (Eds.), Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity (pp. 177–186). Rotterdam: Sense.
Antonowicz, L., Lesné, F., Stassen, S., & Wood, J. (2010). Africa education watch: Good governance lessons for primary education. Berlin: Transparency International.
Anyon, J. (2011). Marx and education. New York: Routledge.
Aurini, J., Davies, S., & Dierkes, J. (Eds.). (2013). Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education. Bingley: Emerald.
Ball, S. J., & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatisation in public education. Brussels: Education International.
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: The Free Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring?. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2015). Designing and implementing mixed approaches to shadow education research: Experiences and lessons in Hong Kong. In M. Bray, O. Kwo, & B. Jokić (Eds.), Researching private supplementary tutoring: Methodological lessons from diverse cultures (pp. 149–178). Hong Kong, Dordrecht: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Springer.
Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Mandaluyong City, Hong Kong: Asian Development Bank, Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Bray, M., Zhan, S., Lykins, C., Wang, D., & Kwo, O. (2014). Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education. Economics of Education Review, 38(1), 24–37.
Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–462.
Census & Statistics Department, Hong Kong, (2005). ‘Latest 2004/05-based consumer price indices. http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_908/cpi_slide.pdf, Accessed June 5, 2016.
Census & Statistics Department, Hong Kong. (2014). Hong Kong annual digest of statistics 2014. Hong Kong: Census & Statistics Department.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
Davies, S., & Aurini, J. (2006). The franchising of private tutoring: A view from Canada. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 123–128.
Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within—Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO.
Education Commission, Hong Kong. (2000). Excel and grow: Education blueprint for the 21st century—Review of education system: Reform proposals. Hong Kong: Education Commission.
Education International (2012). Policy paper on education: Building the future through quality education. Brussels: Education International. http://www.ei-ie.org/en/websections/content_detail/3273.
Egan, K. (2008). The future of education: Reimagining our schools from the ground up. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Grant, G. (2009). Hope and despair in the American city: Why there are no bad schools in Raleigh. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hartmann, S. (2013). Education ‘home delivery’ in Egypt: Private tutoring and social stratification. In M. Bray, A. E. Mazawi, & R. G. Sultana (Eds.), Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity (pp. 57–75). Rotterdam: Sense.
Hong Kong, Education Bureau (2013). Private schools offering non formal curriculum. http://applications.edb.gov.hk/schoolsearch/schoolsearch.aspx?type=nonformal&langno=1, Accessed 21 June 2015.
Hong Kong, Government of (2012). Half-Yearly Economic Report 2012. http://www.hkeconomy.gov.hk/en/pdf/box-12q2-5-2.pdf (Accessed 6 April 2015).
Hsiao, H. M. (2014). Chinese middle classes: Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao and China. London: Routledge.
Jaeger, M. M. (2009). Equal access but unequal outcomes: Cultural capital and educational choice in a meritocratic society. Social Forces, 87(4), 1943–1971.
Jensen, B. (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in Asia. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
Koh, A. (2014). The “magic” of tutorial centres in Hong Kong: An analysis of media marketing and pedagogy in a tutorial centre. International Review of Education, 60(6), 803–819.
Kong, Hong, & Bureau, Education. (2010). Hong Kong senior secondary education and higher education: New academic structure handbook—A learning journey for all students to succeed in the globalised world. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.
KOSIS [Korean Statistical Information Service] (2015). Private education participation rate by school level. Seoul: KOSIS. http://kosis.kr/eng/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ETITLE&parentId=C#SubCont Accessed 5 June 2015.
Kwok, P. L. Y. (2001). A multi-level social analysis of demand for private supplementary tutoring at secondary level in Hong Kong. PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong.
Lui, T. (2011). Concerns of the middle class: After the crisis. Hong Kong: Shang Shu Ju. [in Chinese].
Marples, R. (Ed.). (2002). The aims of education. London: Routledge.
Meyer, H. D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium.
Napporn, C., & Baba-Moussa, A. R. (2013). Accompagnement et soutien scolaires: l’expérience béninois. Revue international d’éducation—Sèvres, 62, 1–10.
Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H. G., & Cowen, R. (Eds.). (2011). PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense.
Runte-Geidel, A. (2015). La educación a la sombre en países del sur de Europa y sus implicaciones sobre la equidad. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 25, 167–182.
Silova, I. (Ed.). (2009). Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia: New opportunities and burdens. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Silova, I., Būdienė, V., & Bray, M. (Eds.). (2006). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tutoring. New York: Open Society Institute.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton & Company.
Tawil, S., & Cougoureux, M. (2013). Revisiting learning: The treasure within—Assessing the influence of the 1996 Delors Report. Paris: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight Occasional Paper 4.
Ventura, A., & Gomes, A. (2013). Supplementary education in Brazil: Diversity and paradoxes. In J. Aurini, S. Davies, & J. Dierkes (Eds.), Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education (pp. 129–151). Bingley: Emerald.
Walker, D. F., & Soltis, J. F. (2009). Curriculum and aims (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Wang, J. (2006). Difficulties and countermeasures in the implementation of quality oriented education in rural primary and secondary schools. Educational Research, 11, 41–46. [in Chinese].
Wang, D. (2011). The dilemma of time: Student-centered teaching in the rural classroom in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 157–164.
Watanabe, M. (2013). Juku: The stealth force of education and the deterioration of schools in Japan. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Wilson, W. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Yang, Y., & Yu, J. (2004). New curriculum in rural areas: Problems and solutions. Educational Development Research, 11, 19–21. [in Chinese].
Zeng, K. M. (1999). Dragon gate: Competitive examinations and their consequences. London: Cassell.