Analyzing Changes in Four Teachers’ Knowledge and Practice of Inquiry-Based Mathematics Teaching

Article Details

Erh-Tsung Chin, Yung-Chi Lin,, nan, Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Hsinchu University of Education, Hsinchu, Taiwan
Hsiao-Lin Tuan, , Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Hsinchu University of Education, Hsinchu, Taiwan

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 25 Issue 2024-05-06 00:00:00 (Published: 2016-12-01)

Abstract

Teachers’ inquiry-based mathematics teaching (IBMT) competence is often acquired and developed through participation in professional development programs (PDPs), but researchers have not established an effective method of assessing teachers’ performance in this area. Moreover, the definition of IBMT, and the relationship between teachers’ mathematics inquiry knowledge and practice, both remain unclear. Therefore, this study first proposes a sophisticated definition of mathematics inquiry-based teaching, and goes on to use this definition as the basis of a systematic, integrated method for assessing teachers’ knowledge and practice of such teaching. Changes in four cases of teachers’ knowledge and practice of IBMT during their participation in a 1-year PDP in Taiwan are reported and analyzed. The data sources included classroom observations as well as interviews and teachers’ concept maps. Data were analyzed using an analytic framework of concept-map structure; essential constructs of knowledge regarding mathematics inquiry; and an analytic framework of inquiry-based teaching practice. The research revealed (1) that all four case teachers made positive progress in both their knowledge of mathematics inquiry and their related teaching practices; (2) that the two sets of gains described in point (1) above did not appear to have any causal relationship; and (3) that although all four teachers’ knowledge and practices were found to have changed, radical changes in their teaching practices were still rare in the short term.

Keywords: Inquiry-based mathematics teaching Knowledge about mathematics inquiry Teaching practices

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-016-0304-3
  References:

Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. doi:10.1002/sce.10118.

Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45(6), 797–810. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6.

Asay, L. D., & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in The Science Teacher, 1998–2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 57–79. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9152-9.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

Bell, C. A., Wilson, S. M., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479–512.

Borasi, R., Fonzi, J., Smith, C. F., & Rose, B. J. (1999). Beginning the process of rethinking mathematics instruction: A professional development program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 49–78.

Bruder, R., & Prescott, A. (2013). Research evidence on the benefits of IBL. ZDM, 45(6), 811–822. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0542-2.

Buchholtz, N., & Kaiser, G. (2013). Improving mathematics teacher education in Germany: Empirical results from a longitudinal evaluation of innovative programs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 949–977.

Chapman, O. (2011). Elementary school teachers’ growth in inquiry-based teaching of mathematics. ZDM, 43(6–7), 951–963. doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0360-3.

Chapman, O., & Heater, B. (2010). Understanding change through a high school mathematics teacher’s journey to inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(6), 445–458. doi:10.1007/s10857-010-9164-6.

Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.

Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi:10.1002/tea.20157.

Dewey, J. (1938/1991). Logic: A theory of inquiry. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Frederiksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 363–407.

Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5–36. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4.

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008a). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., et al. (2008b). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. doi:10.1080/07370000802177235.

Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: The Falmer Press.

Jaworski, B. (2001). Developing mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-learners. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 295–320). Netherlands: Springer.

Kang, N.-H., Orgill, M., & Crippen, K. J. (2008). Understanding teachers’ conceptions of classroom inquiry with a teaching scenario survey instrument. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(4), 337–354.

Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2009). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 172–181.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.

Kremer, A., & Schlüter, K. (2006). Analyse von Gruppensituationen beim forschend-entdeckenden Lernen. Ergebnisse einer ersten Studie. Erkenntnisweg Biologiedidaktik, 5, 145–156.

Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347. doi:10.1002/tea.20191.

Maaß, K., & Doorman, M. (2013). A model for a widespread implementation of inquiry-based learning. ZDM, 45(6), 887–899. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0505-7.

Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: A synthesis. ZDM, 45(6), 779–795.

Morrison, J. A. (2012). Exploring exemplary elementary teachers’ conceptions and implementation of inquiry science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 573–588. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9302-3.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–419). London: Academic Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rink, J. E., French, K., Lee, A. M., & Solmon, M. A. (1994). A comparison of pedagogical knowledge structures of preservice students and teacher educators in two institutions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 140–162.

Rushton, G., Lotter, C., & Singer, J. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ emerging expertise in inquiry teaching: The effect of a professional development model on beliefs and practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 23–52. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9224-x.

Saad, R., & BouJaoude, S. (2012). The relationship between teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about science and inquiry and their classroom practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(2), 113–128.

Secada, W. G., & Williams, T. (2005). Managing uncertainty, creating knowledge. In T. A. Romberg, T. C. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Seung, E., Park, S., & Jung, J. (2013). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of the essential features of inquiry-based science teaching using evidence-based reflection. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 507–529. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9390-x.

Siegel, M., Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (1998). Supporting students’ mathematical inquiries through reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 378–413.

Stonewater, J. K. (2005). Inquiry teaching and learning: The best math class study. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 36–47.

Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.

Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher–practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13–22.

Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N.-H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936–960. doi:10.1002/tea.20032.

Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 63–89.

Wilkins, J. L. M. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 139–164.

Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking revealed in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222–255.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

  Cited by:
     None...