Development and Validation of the Speaking Strategy Inventory for Learners of Chinese (SSILC) as a Second/Foreign Language

Article Details

Peijian Paul Sun, Lawrence Jun Zhang,, nan, New Zealand
Susan M. Gray, , Faculty of Education and Social Work, School of Curriculum and Pedagogy, The University of Auckland,

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 25 Issue 4 (Published: 2016-08-01)

Abstract

Language learning strategies have drawn researchers’ substantial attention since Rubin’s (1975) and Stern’s (1975) studies on “good language learners”. Nevertheless, research pertaining to speaking strategies is inadequate, especially in relation to learning Chinese as a second/foreign language (CSL/CFL). This study, therefore, seeks to address this research gap with an initial attempt of developing an inventory for measuring CSL/CFL students’ strategies in learning how to speak in L2 Chinese: The Speaking Strategy Inventory for Learners of Chinese (SSILC) as a second/foreign language. Given that this is the very first inventory of its kind, the purpose of our study is to validate it so that more teachers of CSL/CFL could be provided with a tool for assessing their L2 Chinese learners’ use and development of speaking strategies. L2 Chinese learners will also be able to use it for monitoring their own progress. Two independent samples of 260 and 135 university L2 Chinese students responded to the SSILC. The data were then subjected to exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), respectively. Results from both EFAs and CFAs provided support for a three-factor speaking strategy inventory with good psychometric properties. The three clusters of speaking strategies are Expression Practice Strategies, Native-like and Involvement Strategies and Assistance Strategies. The correlations between the three clusters of speaking strategies and self-perceived speaking proficiency partially supported the predictive validity of the SSILC. Future research and pedagogical implications for classroom teachers are discussed.

Keywords: Speaking strategy inventory Factor analysis L2 Chinese Scale development and validation Communication strategies

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-016-0287-0
  References:

Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language: Teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.

Chu, W., Lin, D., Chen, T., Tsai, P., & Wang, C. (2015). The relationships between ambiguity tolerance, learning strategies, and learning Chinese as a second language. System, 49, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.10.015.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.

Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Cohen, A. D., & Chi, J. C. (2006). Language strategy uses inventory. In R. M. Paige, A. D. Cohen, B. Kappler, J. C. Chi, & J. P. Lassegard (Eds.), Maximizing study abroad: A students’ guide to strategies for language and culture learning and use (2nd ed., pp. 165–171). Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.

Cohen, A. D., & Griffiths, C. (2015). Revisiting LLS research 40 years later. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 414–429. doi:10.1002/tesq.225.

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (Eds.). (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 210. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.51997005.

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New York: Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1984). Two ways of defining communication strategies. Language Learning, 34(1), 45–63.

Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23. doi:10.1093/applin/19.1.1.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 18.0 update (11th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Gertken, L. M., Amengual, M., & Birdsong, D. (2014). Assessing language dominance with the bilingual language profile. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds, & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp. 208–225). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Hanban (2014). The number of global Chinese language learners tripled in ten years reaching 100 million. Retrieved from http://english.hanban.org/article/2014-12/11/content_566157.htm

Hymes, D. L. (1966). Two types of linguistic relativity. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 114–158). The Hague: Mouton.

Hymes, D. L. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms. New York: Continuum.

Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338–352. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003.

Maleki, A. (2007). Teachability of communication strategies: An Iranian experience. System, 35(4), 583–594. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.04.001.

Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 76–91. doi:10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00266.x.

Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 151–168. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00390.x.

Nakatani, Y. (2010). Identifying strategies that facilitate EFL learners’ oral communication: A classroom study using multiple data collection procedures. Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 116–136.

Nakatani, Y., & Goh, C. (2007). A review of oral communication strategies: Focus on interactionist and psycholinguistic perspectives. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 207–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Oxford, R. L. (1996). Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7(1), 25–46.

Oxford, R. L. (2013). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. New York: Routledge.

Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1–23. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(94)00047-A.

Peng, J. (2014). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL university classroom: An ecological perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.

Rubin, J. (1975). What a “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51.

Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15–30). Englewood: Prentice/Hall International.

Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from a good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 304–318.

Sung, K. Y. (2009). Language learning strategy use and language achievement for American college learners of Chinese as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Texas at San Antonio.

Tarone, E. (1981). Some thoughts on the notion of communication strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15(3), 285–295. doi:10.2307/3586754.

Teng, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). Fostering strategic learning: The development and validation of the writing strategies for motivational regulation questionnaires (WSMRQ). The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 123–134. doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0243-4.

Willems, G. M. (1987). Communication strategies and their significance in foreign language teaching. System, 15(3), 351–364. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(87)90009-1.

Wu, Y. (2008). 意大利学生汉语口语策略使用的个案研究 [A case study on oral Chinese learning strategies used by Italian learners in different social environments]. Chinese Teaching in the World, 4, 88–101.

Yang, M. N. (2007). Language learning strategies for junior college students in Taiwan: Investigating ethnicity and proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 35–57.

Ye, W., & Tan, D. (2015) 汉语口语学习策略结构的教育现场研究 [Developing a tool to measure the structure of oral Chinese learning strategy for speakers of languages of other than Chinese]. 南京师大学报 (社会科学版) [Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Sciences Edition)], 1, 80–87.

Young, S. F. (2005). Objectivity and subjectivity in classroom assessment. In R. J. Wilson (Ed.), Dilemmas in classroom assessment: And what to do about them (pp. 57–64). Winnipeg: Portage & Main Press.

Yunus, N. M., & Singh, K. M. (2014). The use of indirect strategies in speaking: Scanning the MDAB students. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 204–214. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1416.

Zhang, L. J. (2003). Research into Chinese EFL learner strategies: Methods, findings and instructional issues. RELC Journal, 34(3), 284–322. doi:10.1177/003368820303400303.

Zhang, L. J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 320–353. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.223352.

Zhang, L. J. (2016). Towards a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective on language learner autonomy. In R. Barnard & J. Li (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts (pp. 150–166). Phnom Penh: IDP Education.

Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2013). Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 396, 346–361. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2013.12.010.

Zhang, L. J., Aryadoust, V., & Zhang, D. (2016). Taking stock of the effects of strategies-based instruction on writing in Chinese and English in Singapore primary schools. In R. E. Silver & W. Bokhorst-Heng (Eds.), Quadrilingual education in Singapore: Pedagogical innovation in language education (pp. 103–126). Singapore: Springer.

  Cited by:
     None...