The Effect of Trust on the Relationship Between Instructional Leadership and Student Outcomes in Hong Kong Secondary Schools

Article Details

Paula Kwan, nan, Department of Educational Administration and Policy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

Journal: The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Volume 25 Issue 1 (Published: 2016-02-01)

Abstract

In discussions on the contribution of leadership in improving schools, transformational leadership and instructional leadership are, more often than not, portrayed as disparate practices. The former argues for developing teacher collaborative capacity in schools, whereas the latter advocates establishing controlling measures on teaching quality; both lines of thought attract their own supporters. The recent finding that instructional leadership practices have a greater impact on student learning has apparently marginalized researchers’ attention paid to transformational leadership. This study argues that both leadership practices are important to student performance; transformational leadership can foster a trusting environment in schools for facilitating the effective enactment of instructional leadership. Based on a dataset on Hong Kong vice-principals, this quantitative study found that the widely recognised link between instructional leadership and student outcomes did not hold in low-trust schools. As transformational leadership was conducive for trust building, its role in shaping student performance should be re-addressed.

Keywords: Transformational leadership Instructional leadership Trust Student outcomes

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-015-0242-5
  References:

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Barth, R. (1986). On sheep and goats and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4), 293–296.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 49–80). San Diego: Academic Press.

Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–683.

Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.

Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

Coleman, A. (2012). The significance of trust in school-based collaborative leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(1), 79–106.

Cuban, L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective schools research, policy, and practice at the district level. Harvard Educational Review, 54(2), 129–151.

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–27.

Education Bureau (EDB). (2007). Handbook on external school review. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

Education and Manpower Bureau (EMB). (2002). Performance indicators for Hong Kong schools. Hong Kong: Quality Assurance Division, Education Department.

Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3–17.

Groundwater-Smith, S., & Sachs, J. (2002). The activist professional and the reinstatement of trust. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(3), 341–358.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.

Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.

Hoy, W. K., & Smith, P. A. (2007). Influence: A key to successful leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(2), 158–167.

Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen_Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools: The omnibus T-scale. In W. K. Hoy & C. G. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 181–208). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2008). Vice-principalship in Hong Kong: Aspirations, competencies, and satisfaction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1), 73–97.

Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8–13.

Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 249–280.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(Suppl), 679–706.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199.

Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Fernandez, A. (1994). Transformational leadership and teachers’ commitment to change. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship (pp. 77–98). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 243–276.

MacNeil, A. J., Spuck, D.W., & Ceyanes, J.W. (1998, October). Developing trust between principal and teachers. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration Convention, St. Louis.

Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for teachers’ instructional practices and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245–275.

Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, F. D., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

Meindl, J. R. (1995). The romance of leadership; as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 329–341.

Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Opdenakker, M. C., & Damme, J. V. (2007). Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education? British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 179–206.

Robinson, V. M. J. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings on methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 1–26.

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyed, C., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.

Schutz, A. (2011). Power and trust in the public realm: John Dewey, Saul Alinsky, and the limits of progressive democratic education. Educational Theory, 61(4), 491–512.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334–352.

Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.

Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora: Mid-Continent Research for Education and learning.

Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398–425.

Ylimaki, R. M. (2007). Instructional leadership in challenging US schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 11–19.

Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

  Cited by:
     None...