Much research has been conducted to investigate the quality of writing and high-level revisions in word processing-assisted and pen-and-paper writing modes. Studies that address cognitive aspects, such as experience and comfort with computers, by which students compose essays during writing assessments have remained relatively unexplored. To fill this gap, the present study investigates the impact of writing using computers versus traditional writing with pen-and-paper based on 366 undergraduate students in Singapore. It analyzes the students’ thinking processes, the quality of their written work, and their perceptions of working with computers. The results indicate that the students demonstrated a positive attitude towards working with computers. Furthermore, the computer-delivered writing mode has a positive impact on the quality of writing in both technical aspects (content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics) and global aspects (setting macro rhetorical goal and ordering information in achieving the macro rhetorical goal). On the other hand, the results show that there was no significant difference between the paper and computer writing modes in their effects during the planning stage of writing in-class reflections. The study contributes to writing research by encouraging teachers to give students an option of delivery modes, beyond traditional pen-and-paper, for their writing assessments.
Keywords: Writing Thinking processes Writing quality Perceptions of working with computersBereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities. London: Macmillan.
Cumming, A., & So, S. (1996). Tutoring second language text revisions: Does the approach to instruction or the language of communication make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(3), 197–226.
Dalton, D. W., & Hannafin, M. J. (1987). The effect of word processing on written composition. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 338–342.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
Gressard, C. P., & Loyd, B. H. (1986). Validation studies of a new computer attitude scale. Association for Education Data System Journal, 18, 295–301.
Hawisher, G. E. (1987). The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 145–160.
Howell, D. C. (2007). Statistical methods in psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Lam, F. S., & Pennington, M. C. (1995). The computer vs. the pen: A comparative study of word processing in a Hong Kong secondary classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 8, 75–92.
Lee, Y. (2002). A comparison of composing processes and written products in timed essay tests across paper-and-pencil and computer modes. Assessing Writing, 8, 135–257.
Lee, H. K. (2004). A comparative study of ESL writers’ performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test. Assessing Writing, 9, 4–26.
Li, J. (2006). The mediation of technology in ESL writing and its implications for writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 11, 5–21.
Li, J., & Cumming, A. (2001). Word processing and ESL writing: A longitudinal case study. International Journal of English Studies, 1, 127–152.
Liu, X., Macmillan, R. B., & Timmons, V. (1998). Integration of computers into the curriculum: How teachers may hinder students’ use of computers. McGill Journal of Education, 33(1), 51–69.
Ministry of Education. (1997). Masterplan for information technology. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (1997). Word processors and children`s writing in a high-computer-access setting. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 202–220.
Rohman, G. (1965). Pre-writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 16, 106–112.
Simonson, M. (1995). Instructional technology and attitude change. In G. J. Aglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 365–373). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Teichman, M., & Poris, M. (1989). Initial effects of word processing on writing quality and writing anxiety in freshman writers. Computers and Humanities, 23(2), 93–103.
Teo, T. (2006). Attitudes toward computers: A study of post-secondary students in Singapore. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 17–24.
Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 413–424.
Wolfe, E. W., & Manalo, J. R. (2004). Computer medium comparability in a direct writing assessment. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 53–65.