Grey Directors on Philippine Corporate Boards

Article Details

Ailyn A. Shi, ailyn.shi@dlsu.edu.ph, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Angelo A. Unite, , De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Evan Lance C. Li Liao, ailyn.shi@dlsu.edu.ph, Lee Business School, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Michael J. Sullivan, , De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines

Journal: DLSU Business and Economics Review
Volume 31 Issue 2 (Published: 2022-01-01)

Abstract

Independent directors on a firm’s board are theorized to enhance corporate governance by mitigating agency conflicts. However, some independent directors, referred to as grey directors, have prior relationships with managers that may hamper this role. Using data for Philippine firms, we construct a measure that categorizes independent directors as truly independent or grey, based on the 12 criteria used to define board independence as stipulated in the 2017 Philippine Corporate Governance Code. This measure is used to examine which firms are more likely to appoint grey directors and how the presence of grey directors affect firm performance. Consistent with agency theory, we find that firms with higher ownership concentration are more likely to have grey directors. However, we find that the presence of these grey directors does not adversely affect firm performance. We conclude that while grey directors are common among Philippine firms, their presence does not appear to escalate agency problems.

Keywords: Corporate Governance, Board of Directors, Family Firms, International Finance

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/1unite-0312.pdf
  References:

Adam, T., & Goyal, V. K. (2008). The investment opportunity set and its proxy variables. Journal of Financial Research, 31(1), 41-–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2008.00231.x

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x

Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of board of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58-–107. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40651578

Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377-–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331397

Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-–237. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4131472

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D

Ballinger, G. A. (2004). Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 127-–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263672

Bartholomeusz, S., & Tanewski, G. A. (2006). The relationship between family firms and corporate governance. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 245-–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00166.x

Baysinger, B., & Butler, H. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 101-–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/764908

Beasley, M. (1998). Boards of directors and fraud. The CPA Journal, 68(4), 56-–58. https://www.proquest.com/docview/212270311?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true

Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231-–273. http://ssrn.com/abstract=313026

Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer, 54(3), 921-–963. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40687871

Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2013). Director ownership, governance, and performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(1), 105-–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109013000045

Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Predicting firms’ corporate governance choices: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 660-–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.001

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3, 105-–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200068

Borokhovich, K. A., Boulton, T. J., Brunarski, K. R., & Harman, Y. S. (2014). The incentives of grey directors: Evidence from unexpected executive and board chair turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 102-–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.015

Cavaco, S., Crifo, P., Reberioux, A., & Roudaut, G. (2017). Independent directors: Less informed but better selected than affiliated board members? Journal of Corporate Finance, 43(C), 106-–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.01.004

Chen, E.-T., & Nowland, J. (2010). Optimal board monitoring in family-owned companies: Evidence from Asia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(1), 3-–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00778.x

Choi, J., Park, S., & Yoo, S. (2007). The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(4), 941-–962. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27647330

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-–2), 81-–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2

Coles, J. L., Daniel, D. N., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329-–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008

Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371-–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0

Crespi-Cladera, R., & Pascual-Fuster, B. (2014). Does the independence of independent directors matter? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28(C), 116-–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.009

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269-–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K

dela Rama, M. (2012). Corporate governance and corruption: Ethical dilemmas of Asian business groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 501-–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1142-0

Dittmann, I., Maug, E., & Schneider, C. (2010). Bankers on the boards of German firms: What they do, what they are worth, and why they are (still) there. Review of Finance, 14(1), 35-–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfp007

Dumlao-Abadilla, D. (2020, August 5). Public float requirement raised for firms listing on PSE. Inquirer.net. Retrieved from https://business.inquirer.net/304425/public-float-requirement-raised-for-firms-listing-on-pse

Fich, E. M. (2005). Are some outside directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments by Fortune 1000 firms. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1943-–1972. https://doi.org/10.1086/431448

Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2007). Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), 306-–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.012

Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board independence and firm performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460-–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30152-6

Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Frias-Aceituno, J. V., & Dominguez, L. R. (2015). The ethical commitment of independent directors in different contexts of investor protection. Business Research Quarterly, 18(2), 81-–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.07.001

Greenbury, R. (1995). Directors’ remuneration: Report of a study group chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury. London: Gee Publishing.

Hallock, K. F. (1997). Reciprocally interlocking boards of directors and executive compensation. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32(3), 331-–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331203

Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M.S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7-–26. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/03v09n1/0304herm.pdf

Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 96-–118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/116820

Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4), 101-–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665716https://doi.org/10.2307/3665716

Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1988). The determinants of board composition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589-–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555459

Hsu, H. H., & Wu, C. Y. H. (2014). Board composition, grey directors, and corporate failure in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 215-–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.12.002

Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220-–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017

Hutchinson, M., & Gul, F.A. (2004). Investment opportunity set, corporate governance practices and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(4), 595-–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00022-1

Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61-–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6

Kao, M. F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors, and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance, 19(1), 189-–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2018-0144

Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outside directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284-–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.013

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Leung, S., Richardson, G., & Jaggi, B. (2014). Corporate board and board committee independence, firm performance, and family ownership concentration: An analysis based on Hong Kong firms. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(1), 16-–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2013.11.002

Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13-–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.1.13

Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30(C), 223-–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004

Mak, Y. T., & Li, Y. (2001). Determinants of corporate ownership and board structure: Evidence from Singapore. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 235-–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00021-9

Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation, and the growth of firms. The American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023-–1051. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812180

Millstein, I. M., & MacAvoy, P. W. (1998). The active board of directors and performance of the large publicly traded corporation. Columbia Law Review, 98(5), 1283-–1322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123383

Molz, R. (1988). Managerial domination of boards of directors and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 16(3), 235-–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(88)90072-0

Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417-–1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408

Pan, W. (2001). Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics, 57(1), 120-–125. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676849

Pombo, C., & Gutierrez, L. H. (2011). Outside directors, board interlocks, and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Colombian business groups. Journal of Economics and Business, 63(4), 251-–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2011.01.002

Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106

Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175-–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H

Saldaña, C. G. (2000). Philippine corporate governance: Environment and policy and their impact on performance and finance. Philippine Review of Economics, 37(2), 129-–140. https://pre.econ.upd.edu.ph/index.php/pre/article/view/38/533

Schultz, E., Tian, G. Y., & Twite, G. (2013). Corporate governance and the CEO pay-performance link: Australian evidence. International Review of Finance, 13(4), 447-–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12012

Tan, E. A. (1993). Interlocking directorates, commercial banks, other financial institutions and non-financial corporations. Philippine Review of Economics, 30(1), 1-–50. https://pre.econ.upd.edu.ph/index.php/pre/article/view/136/461

Unite, A. A., & Sullivan, M. J. (2000). Reform and the corporate environment in the Philippines. In P. Drysdale (Ed.), Reform and recovery in East Asia: The role of the state and economic enterprise (pp. 191-–213). New York: Routledge.

Unite, A. A., Sullivan, M. J., & Shi, A. A. (2019). Board diversity and performance of Philippine firms: Do women matter? International Advances in Economic Research, 25(1), 65-–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-018-09718-z

Vafeas, N., & Theodorou, E. (1998). The relationship between board structure and firm performance in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 30(4), 383-–407. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1998.0075

Vu, M.-C., Phan, T., & Le, N. (2018). Relationship between board ownership structure and firm financial performance in a transitional economy: The case of Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 45(C), 512-–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.09.002

Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581-–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005

Yammeesri, J., & Herath, S. K. (2010). Board characteristics and corporate value: Evidence from Thailand. Corporate Governance, 10(3), 279-–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011051910

Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5

Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K.-Y. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42(1), 121-–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531248

  Cited by:
     None...