The intellectual property (IP) system plays a vital role in public health crises as everyone should have access to medicines and equipment to protect themselves. Thus, the State can utilize the system for the greater good. An IP-centric approach can be summarized using the simple letters of the vowels: Awareness – for the populace to respect IP rights, they must first be educated as to its value; Enforcement – for infringers to be discouraged, IP holders should have an avenue for the easy enforcement of their rights; Incentivize – for businesses to be encouraged to invest in certain forms of IP, the State should grant fiscal/non-fiscal incentives to key industries; Ownership – for researchers and educational institutions to bloom, there must be a well-defined ownership structure for intellectual property; and Utilization – for the public to benefit from the protection granted to private entities, such inventions must be utilized in a fair and reasonable manner. The paper provides a discussion on the challenges and opportunities of the Intellectual Property System in the Philippines and provides suggestions to fine-tune the intellectual property system to serve as an incentive mechanism to align private motives for innovation with the preferences of society.
Keywords: Intellectual Property, Patents, LawAlfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc. et al. (191 F.2d 99 2d Cir. 1951). Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (n.d.). Intellectual property. Retrieved from: https://asean.org/aseaneconomic-community/sectoral-bodies-under-thepurview-of-aem/intellectual-property/
Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (1995). ASEAN Framework Agreement on Intellectual Property Cooperation. Retrieved from: https://asean. org/?static_post=asean-framework-agreement-onintellectual-property-cooperation-bangkok-thailand-15-december-1995 Association of Southeast Asian Nations on Intellectual Property. (2020). ASEAN Enforcement Action Plan. Retrieved from: https://www.aseanip.org/Portals/0/ASEAN%20IPR%20Enforcement%20Action%20Plan. pdf?ver=2018-01-04-150134-093
Berne Convention, 1971. Cheaper Medicines Act, Rep. Act No. 9502 (2008). Const. (1987) (Phil.). Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, c. 48 (Eng.).
Correa, C. M. (2002). Implications of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health.
David Blackburn, J. A. (2019). Impacts of digital video piracy on the U.S. economy. United States Chamber of Commerce. Department of Finance. (2020). Package 2: Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises Act (CREATE). Retrieved from https://taxreform.dof.gov.ph/tax-reform-packages/p2-corporate-recovery-and-taxincentives-for-enterprises-act/
Doha Declaration. (2001). Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health.
Eberly, A. E. (2007). An evaluation of personal protective equipment used with local public health employees (Master’s thesis). UCHC Graduate School. Retrieved from: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1129&context=uchcgs_ masters
Hetcher, S. (2012). User-generated content and the future of copyright: Part two—Agreements between users and mega-sites. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal. Volume 24, Issue 4, Article 3.
Intellectual Property Code, Rep. Act No. 8293 (2015). Intellectual Property Office (IPOPHL). (2013).
Office Order Intellectual Property Office. (2018). Annual report for the year 2018. Intellectual Property Office
Intellectual Property Office. (2020a). Intellectual Property Academy. Retrieved from https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/ ip-academy/
Intellectual Property Office. (2020b). Inventors Assistance Program. Retrieved from https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/ inventor-assistance-program/#:~:text=Inventor%20Assistance%20Program%20%2D%20 IPOPHL& text=For%20some%20 inventors%20in%20developing,innovation%20and%20intellectual%20 property%20protection.&text=This%20program%20matches%20under%2Dr Intellectual Property OfficeIPOPHL. (2020c). IPOPHL,
CHED tie up to integrate IP in universities and colleges. Retrieved from: https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/news/ipophl-ched-tie-up-to-integrate-ip-in-universitiesand-colleges/ Intellectual Property Office. (2020d). IPOPHL and PIDS sign MOU on strengthening IP research. Retrieved from https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/news/ipophl-and-pids-signmou-on-strengthening-ip-research/
Intellectual Property Office. (2020e). Juana Make a Mark Program. Retrieved from https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/juana-make-a-mark-trademark-assistance-program/ Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.a). Intellectual Property Office. Retrieved from https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/news/ipophl-sets-patent-workshops-training-to-spurprotection-commercialisation-of-university-research/
Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.b). Seven point agenda. Retrieved from https://www.ipophil.gov.ph/ipophl-7- point-agenda/ Implementing Rules and Regulations for Patents, Utility
Models and Industrial Designs. (2011). International Shoe v. State of Washington (1945).
International Trademark Association. (2020). Interview with Philippines IP Office Director General Barba: Part II. Retrieved from: https://www.inta.org/perspectives/interview-with-philippines-ip-office-director-general barba-part-ii/ Japan Patent Office. (1998). Kokka-Koumuin no Shokumuhatsumet ni taisuru Hoshoukin Shiharai Yoryo (The Guideline of Remuneration for Inventions Made by Government Employees). Japan Patent Office.
Library of Congress Copyright Office. (2005). Notice of inquiry: Orphan works’ federal register 3739. Library of Congress
Mühlendahl, S. (2009). Territorial intellectual property rights in a global economy—Transit and other ‘free zones.’ In Wolrad Prinz zu Waldeck und Pyrmont Martin J. AdelmanRobert BrauneisJosef Drexl, Patents, and technological progress in a globalized world MPI studies on intellectual property, competition and tax law. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Pages 653-673
Mühlendahl, S. D. (2009). Territorial intellectual property rights in a global economy—Transit and other ‘free zones.’ Wolrad Prinz zu Waldeck und PyrmontMartin J. AdelmanRobert BrauneisJosef Drexl, Patents and technological progress in a globalized world. MPI studies on intellectual property, competition and tax law (vol. 6). Springer. New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958.
Patents for Humanity Program Improvement Act, H.R. 7259, 116th Cong. (2020). Retrieved from https://www. congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/7259 Peuker, A. (2012). Territoriality and extraterritoriality in intellectual property law. Queen Mary Studies in International Law, Brill. Volume 11. Pages 189-228.
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. (2016). 2016 biopharmaceutical research industry profile. Washington, DC: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. Philippine News Agency. (2020). IP registration to speed up via ‘‘Sci-tech Superhighway.’’. Retrieved from: https:// www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1122138.
Technology Transfer Act of 2009, Rep. Act No. 10055 (2010). Sweet Lines v. Teves (1978).
TRIPS. (1995). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
UNDP. (2001). Human Development Report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development. New York Oxford Oxford University Press 2001
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (, June 10, June 1958.) United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (n.d.). Patents for humanity. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/patent-policy/patents-humanity World Health Organization. WHO Constitution (1948).
World Health Organization – United Nations Development Program WHO-UNDP. (2005). Remuneration guidelines for non-voluntary use of patents on medical technology.
World Health Organization, World Intellectual Property Organization, World Trade Organization (WHOWIPO-WTO). (2012). Promoting access to medical technologies and innovation, intersections between public health, intellectual property, and trade.
WHOWIPO-WTO World Intellectual Property Organization (2008). WIPO intellectual property handbook. World Intellectual Property Organization
World Intellectual Property Organization . (2011). World intellectual property report. Geneva. World Intellectual Property Organization