Although a restatement is usually assumed to result from fraudulent behavior, Plumlee and Yohn (2010) studied whether a restatement might be attributed to both errors in the corporation’s internal controls and intentional misrepresentation. Moreover, prior research supports the notion that investors, regulators, boards, and other stockholders differentiate between fraud and error (Hennes et al., 2008). This study provides a preliminary understanding of how undetected fraud and error misstatements affect auditor liability, given the same outcome severity. A 2x2 between-subject experiment was conducted using undergraduate accounting students to represent evaluators who have high levels of auditing knowledge and non accounting students to represent evaluators with low levels of auditing knowledge. The results from the experiment indicate that evaluators with high auditing knowledge assess auditors as less liable in cases of undetected misstatements due to fraud rather than an error. In contrast, less knowledgeable evaluators rate auditors as being more liable in such cases. The findings of this study provide some insights that benefit the audit profession, standard setters, and the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) concerning the auditor’s responsibility relating to fraud by demonstrating that different types of misstatements (i.e., fraud and error) contribute to differences in auditor liability judgments, especially when misstatements are evaluated by evaluators with different levels of auditing knowledge. This finding also suggests that the auditor litigation risk created by the expectation The gap will remain despite any attempt to minimize it.
Keywords: misstatement due to error, misstatement due to fraud, auditing knowledge, experiment, auditor liability, counterfactual reasoningAlicke, M. D. , & Rose, D. (2012). Culpable control and causal deviance. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10),. 723-–735.
Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological bBulletin, 126(4), 556-–574.
Anderson, B., Maletta, M., & Wright, A. (1998). Perceptions of auditor responsibility: Views of the judiciary and the profession. International Journal of Auditing, 2(3), 215-–232.
Arel, B., Jennings, M. M., Pany, K., & Reckers, P. M. J. (2012). Auditor liability: A comparison of judge and juror verdicts. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(5), 516-–532.
Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 75-–91.
Backof, A. (2015). The impact of audit evidence documentation on juror’s negligence verdicts and damages awards. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2177-–2204.
Backof, A., Bowlin, K., & Goodson, B. (2014). The impact of proposed changes to the content of the audit report on jurors’s assessments of auditor negligence. Available at SSRN 2446057.
Bonner, S. E., Palmrose, Z. V., & Young, S. M. (1998). Fraud type and auditor litigation: An analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases. Accounting Review, 73(4), 503-–532.
Brasel, K. R., Doxey, M. M., Greiner, J. H., & Reffett, A. (2016). Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effect of reporting critical audit matters on judgment of auditor’s liability. The Accounting Review, 91(5), 1345-–1362.
Brown, C. E., & Solomon, I. (1991). Configural information processing in auditing: The role of domain-specific knowledge. Accounting Review, 66(1), 100-–119.
Brown, T., Majors, T.M. & Peecher, M.E., 2014, The impact of a judgmental rule and critical audit matters on assessment of auditor legal liability – The moderating role of legal knowledge, Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2483221.
Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2001). A research note on the effect of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 111-–125.
Cohen, J., Ding, Y., Lesage, C., & Stolowy, H. (2015). Media bias and the persistence of the expectation gap: An analysis of press articles on corporate fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, x, 1-23.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting materiality accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17-–82.
Desai, H., Hogan, C. E., & Wilkins, M. S. (2006). The reputational penalty for aggressive accounting: Earnings restatements and management turnover. The Accounting Review, 81(1), 83-–112.
Donelson, D., Kadous, K., & McInnis, J. (2014) Research on litigation against auditors. In D. Hay, D., W. R. Knechel, W.R., & M. Willekens, M. (Eds.), Companion to auditing (pp. 54-–66), New York, NY:. Routledge.
Eutsler, J., Nickell, E. B., & Robb, S. (2016). Fraud risk awareness and the likelihood of audit enforcement action. Accounting Horizons, 30(3), 379-–392.
Firth, M., Mo, P. L., & Wong, R. M. (2005). Financial statement frauds and auditor sanctions: An analysis of enforcement actions in China. Journal of Business
Ethics, 62(4), 367–381.
Gimbar, C., Hansen, T. B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2016). Early evidence on the effect of critical audit matter on auditor’s liability. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(1). A24-–A33.
Grenier, J. H., Pomeroy, B., & Stern, M. T. (2015). The effects of accounting standard precision, auditor task expertise, and judgment frameworks on audit firm litigation exposure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 336-–357.
Grenier, J. H., Reffett, A., Simon, C. A., & Warne, R.C. (2018). Reaching juror judgment and decision making in cases of alleged auditor negligence: A toolkit for new scholars. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 30(1), 99-–110.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
Hennes, K. M., Leone, A. J., & Miller, B. P. (2008). The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1487-–1519.
Hennes, K. M., Leone, A. J., and & Miller, B. P. (2014)., “Determinants and market consequences of auditor dismissals after accounting restatements.”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 89( No. 3), pp. 1051-–1082.
Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley Jr, R. A., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231-252.
Hribar, P., & Jenkins, N. T., (2004). The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(2-3), 337-–356.
International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board. (IAASB), n.d.) Staff questions and answers. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IAASB%20Professional%20Skepticism%20QandA-final.pdf/
International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board (IAASB) (2010), International Standard on Auditing No. 240. The Auditor’s Responsibilities relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a012-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf.
International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board (IAASB) (2019), International Standard on Auditing No. 315. Identifying and Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatements. Retrieved from https://www.iaasb.org/publications/isa-315-revised-2019-identifying-and-assessing-risks-material-misstatement.
Kadous, K. (2000). The effects of audit quality and consequence severity on juror evaluations of auditor responsibility for plaintiff losses. The Accounting Review, 75(3), 327-–341.
Kadous, K. (2001). Improving jurors` evaluations of auditors in negligence cases. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(3), 425-–444.
Kadous, K., & Mercer, M. (2012). Can reporting norms create a safe harbor? Jury verdicts against auditors under precise and imprecise accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 565-–587.
Kechelmeier, S. J., Schmidt, J. J., & Valentine, K. (2014). The disclaimer effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report. Available at SSRN 2481284.
Kinney, W. (2000). Discussant comments on research on nature, characteristics and causes of accounting errors: The need for a multi-method approach. Journal of Accounting Literature, 19, 93-–101.
Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425-–450.
Libby, R., Bloomfield, R., & Nelson, M. W. (2002). Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 775-–810.
Lowe, D. J., Reckers, P. M., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2002). The effects of decision-aid use and reliability on jurors’ evaluation of auditor’s liability. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 185-–202.
McLannahan, B. (2016, August 26). PwC settles $5.5bn fraud detection lawsuit. The Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/befa9e50-6ba4-11e6-a0b1-d87a9fea034f
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8(6), 423-–429.
Menon, J. W. (1995). Adversarial medical and scientific testimony and lay jurors: A proposal for medical malpractice reform. Am. JL & Med., 21, 281-300.
Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Deibert, R. J. (1996). Psychological biases in counterfactual thought experiments. In P. E. Tetlock & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives (pp. 296-–300), New Jersey:. Princeton University Press.
Palmrose, M. E., Richardson, V. J., & Scholz, S. (2004). Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 59-–89.
Palmrose, Z. (2006). Maintaining the Vvalue and Vviability of Iindependent Aauditors as Ggatekeepers Uunder SOX: An Aauditing Mmaster Pproposal. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a226/fa754cc4be77dff7df63298afd139d84d67d.pdf?_ga=2.1412721.1936649594.1590989303-475388956.1552462107.
Peecher, M. E., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (2013). An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 38(8), 596-–620.
Plumlee, M., & Yohn, T.L. (2010). An analysis of the underlying causes attributed to restatements. Accounting Horizons, 24(1), 41-–64.
Reffett, A. (2010). Can identifying and investigating fraud risks increase auditor’s liability? The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2145-–2167.
Reffett, A., Brewster, B. E., & Ballou, B. (2012). Comparing Aauditor versus Nnon-Aauditor Aassessments of Aauditor Lliability: An Eexperimental Iinvestigation of Eexperts` versus Llay Eevaluators` Jjudgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(3), 125-–148.
Robbennolt, J. K. (2000). Outcome Severity and Judgments of “Responsibility”: A Meta‐Analytic Review. Journal of applied social psychology, 30(12), 2575-2609.
Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking.Psychological bulletin, 121(1), 133-148.
Sanna, L. J., & Turley-Ames, K. J. (2000). Counterfactual intensity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 273-–296.
Schkade, D. A., & Kilbourne, L. M. (1991). Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49(1), 105-–123.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgment of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guildford Press.