A Test of the Generalized Yunus Equation and its Implications for Microcredit in the Philippines

Article Details

Jasmin-Mae Santos Luy, jsantos@math.upd.edu.ph, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines

Journal: DLSU Business and Economics Review
Volume 29 Issue 2 (Published: 2020-01-01)

Abstract

Microcredit is one of the most important financial services offered by microfinance institutions (MFIs) in the Philippines. Loan repayment by frequent installments faces the challenge of possible random delays, which leads to random interest rates. Such randomness affects both microlenders and borrowers. This research utilizes a mathematical model called the generalized Yunus equation (GYE) to study the microloan repayment process in the Philippine setting. Using this model, an explicit formula was formulated expressing the effective interest rate involved in repayment as a function of the time when the delay takes place, which closely approximates the actual values of the rate that microlenders receive. The model can potentially help lenders identify how much interest they gain or lose, which is a viable part of their operation’s sustainability.

Keywords: generalized Yunus equation, loan repayment, microcredit, random interest rate

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/10Santos-Luy-012220.pdf
  References:

Abbas, A. O., & Zhang, H. (2016). Empirical evidence impact of interest rate on loan repayment of microfinance institution in Tanzania. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 5(5), 143-–148. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijber.20160505.12.

Addae-Korankye, A. (2014). Causes and control of loan default/delinquency in microfinance institutions in Ghana. American International Journal of contemporary Research, 4, 36-–45.

Bersales, L. (2017, July 4). Farmers, fishermen, and children consistently posted the highest poverty incidence among basic sectors – PSA. Retrieved from http://psa.gov.ph/poverty-press-releases.

Brau, J., & Woller, G. (2004). Microfinance: A comprehensive review of the existing literature. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 9, 1-–28.

Conchada, M. P., & Tiongco, M. (2017). Making social health insurance and micro-savings programs work for the informal sector in the Philippines. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 27(1), 107-–123.

Daley, S., & Sautet, F. (2005). Microfinance in action: The Philippine experience. (Mercatus Policy Comment No. 1). Retrieved atAccessed from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1264013.

Diener, F., & Diener, M. (Editors.). (1995). Nonstandard analysis in practice. Place of publication: Springer, Verlag/Berlin/Heidelberg.

Diener, M., & Khodr, O. (2009). About the Tedeschi model for microlending. In Proceedings of the 16th Mathematical Conference of Bangladesh Mathematical Society (pp. xx–xx). Place of publication: Publisher.

Diener, M., & Santos, J. (2016). Randomness of interest rates in microcredit. Matimyás Matematika, 39, 1-–16.

Geron, M. (2011). Microfinance industry report – Philippines. Tech. Report 2010 Place of publication: Microfinance Council of the Philippines, Inc.

Guntz, S. (2011). Sustainability and profitability of microfinance Institutions. (Tech. Report Research Paper No. 4)., Place of publication: Center for Applied International Finance and Development (CAIFD), University of Applied Sciences in Nuremberg.

Habaradas, R., & Umali, M. (2013). The microfinance industry in the Philippines: Striving for financial inclusion in the midst of growth. (DLSU Center for Business Research and Development Working Paper, No. 2013-05). Manila: DLSU Center for Business Research and Development. DOIdoi: 10.2139/ssrn.2568021

Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2011). Microcredit in theory and practice: Using randomized credit scoring for impact evaluation. Science, 332(6035), 1278-–1284. DOIdoi: 10.1126/science.1200138

Keisler, H. (1986). Elementary calculus:, An infinitesimal approach. California: Prindle, Weber & Schmidt, Inc., California.

Mauk. P. (2013). Modélisation mathématique du microcrédit. [English translation] (Unpublished doctoral PhD thesis dissertation)., Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Location.

Nobel Media AB. (2006). Grameen Bank – facts. NobelPrize.org. Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2006/grameen/facts/.

Nelson, E. (1977). Internal set theory: A new approach to nonstandard analysis. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 83, 1165-–1193.

Rosenberg, R. (1999). Measuring microcredit delinquency: Ratios can be harmful to your health. (Tech. Report Occasional Paper, No. 3)., Washington DC: The Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest (CGAP), Washington DC.

Rosenberg, R. (2002). Microcredit interest rates. (Occasional Paper No. 1),. Research & Analysis Publication.Washington, DC: The Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest (CGAP). Retrieved from https://www.cgap.org/research/publication/microcredit-interest-rates.

Santos, J. (2017). On the generalized Yunus equation for microcredit. (Unpublished PhD thesis doctoral dissertation)., Institute of Mathematics, University of the Philippines-Diliman.

Snelling, C. (2012, February 9). Microcapital brief: Microfinance Credit Bureau, MiDAS, Llaunched by Microfinance Institutions in Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.microcapital.org/microcapital-brief-microfinance-credit-bureau-midas-launched-by-microfinance-institutions-in-philippines/.

Tedeschi, G. A. (2006). Here today, gone tomorrow: Can dynamic incentives make microfinance more flexible?. Journal of Development Economics, 80, 84-–85.

“The Eeffect of Iinterest Rrate on Lloan Rrepayment in Mmicrofinance Iinstitutions – A Ccase Sstudy of Lapo Micro Finance Bank”. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.uniprojectmaterials.com/banking-and-finance/the-effect-of-interest-rate-on-loan-repayment-in-microfinance-institutions-a-case-study-of-lapo-micro-finance-bank/project-topics-materials-for-final-year-students.

Yunus, M., with & Jolis, A. (1999). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs, New York.

  Cited by:
     None...