Creativity, Innovation, and Sustainability: Insights of Entrepinays in the Handicrafts Industry

Article Details

Divina M. Edralin, ana.asis-castro@dlsu.edu.ph, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Maria Victoria P. Tibon, , De La Salle University, Philippines and San Beda University, Philippines
Paz Esperanza T. Poblador, , De La Salle University, Philippines and San Beda University, Philippines
Junius W. Yu, , De La Salle University, Philippines and San Beda University, Philippines

Journal: DLSU Business and Economics Review
Volume 28 Issue 3 (Published: 2019-04-01)

Abstract

This study analyzed the insights of Filipina entrepreneurs in the handicrafts industry on creativity and sustainability as they relate to innovation. Specifically, the responses of the EntrePinays in Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao pertaining to factors affecting their innovation activities; the degree of implementation of innovation activities; factors hampering innovation activities; and the effects/impact of innovation on sustainability and other outcomes were compared. The study utilized the conceptual framework on creativity and entrepreneurship by Matthews (2007) and the innovation measurement framework of the OECD/Eurostat (2005). Two hundred three Filipina entrepreneurs in the handicrafts industry from Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao were interviewed using the adapted survey instrument from OECD/Eurostat (2005). Results indicate that on a national scale, only creativity and laws and regulations significantly influence product innovations. Moreover, the influence of creativity is twice as much as that of laws and regulations. Likewise, it was found that only the institutional factor (incentive program for innovations) significantly influences process innovations. Among the innovation activities, product and marketing innovation activities have the highest level of implementation. Organizational innovations activities, on the other hand, are the least implemented. There are no significant differences in the degree of implementation of innovation activities among Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao Entrepinays. Only product and organizational innovations affect sustainability. Thus, the study recommends that more training programs be offered, both by the government and private sectors, as well as the academe, to enhance entrepreneurs’ creativity; and for the government to ensure that laws and regulations affecting entrepreneurs’ efforts to undertake product innovation will protect and foster such initiatives for creative outcomes.

Keywords: creativity, innovation, sustainability, entrepreneurship, handicraft industry, women entrepreneur

DOI: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/7-edralin-et-al-041519.pdf
  References:

Alsaaty, F. M. (2011). A model for building innovation capability in small entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 17(1), 1–-21.

Amabile, T. (2013). Componential theory of creativity. In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (pp. xx–xx). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Amabile, T. (1988). A model of creativity and innovations in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–-167.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 997–-1013.

Ariss, S., & Deilami, V. (2012). An integrated framework for the study of organizational innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 9(1). DOIdoi: 10.1142/S0219877012500034

Baharin, I., & Sentosa, I. (2012, May-June). Sustainable development and multinational business. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 1(3), 50–-56.

Blauth, M., Mauer, R., & Brettel, M. (2014). Fostering creativity in new product development through entrepreneurial decision making. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 495–-509.

Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. (2000). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (2000), 165–-180.

Bull, I., & Willard, G. (1993). Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (1993), 183–-195.

Burroughs, J. E., Dahl, D. W., Moreau, C. P., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn, G. J. (2011). Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 53–-67.

Caning, C., & Edralin D. (2016). Innovation management strategies of four pioneering Entrepinays from Camarines Sur, Philippines. ABAC ODI Journal Vision. Action. Outcome, 3(2), 228–-242.

Chen, M., & Kaufmann, G. (2008). Employee creativity and R&D: A critical review. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 71–-6.

Dearing, A. (2000, June 19). Sustainable innovation: Drivers and barriers. Paper presented at the OECD TIP workshop. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/2105727.pdf

Decena, A. (1991). Profile of the Philippine handicraft industry. Retrieved from http://scinet.dost.gov.ph/

DiLiello, T., & Houghton, J. (2008). Creative potential and practiced creativity: Identifying untapped creativity in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 37–-46.

Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Innovation and principles. Jordan-Hill, Oxford: Elsevier Linacre House.

Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–-141. DOI: 10.1002/bse.323

Edwards-Schachter, M., Garcia-Granero, A., Sanchez-Barrioluengo, M., Quesada-Pineda, H., & Amara, N. (2015). Disentangling competencies: Interrelations on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 27–-39.

Fillis, I., & Rentschler, R. (2010). The role of creativity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18, 49–81.

Heyne, P., Boettke, P., & Prychitko, D. (2010). The economic way of thinking (12th Eded.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organization: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377–400.

Matthews, J. (2007). Creativity and entrepreneurship: Potential partners or distant cousins? In R. Chapman, Ross, (Eds.), Proceedings Managing your intellectual and social capital: Proceedings of the 21st ANZAM 2007 Conference, pages pp. 1-17, held in Sydney, Australia. (pp. 1–17). Place of publication: Publisher.

Nowduri, S. (2012). Framework for sustainability entrepreneurship for small and medium enterprises enterprises (SMES) in an emerging economy. World Journal of Management, 4(1), 52–-66.

OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en

Beth 811. (2015, April 14). Philippine handicraft industry: Their benefits and importance (2015, April 19). Hubpages. Retrieved from http://beth811.hubpages.com/hub/Philippine-Handicraft-IndustryTheir-Benefits-and-Importance

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy & the Environment (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 20(4), 222–-237.

Saunila, M. (2014). Innovation capability for SME success: pPerspectives of financial and operational performance. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(2), 163–175.

Sheldon, K. (1995). Creativity and goal conflict. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 299–306.

United Nations. (2006). Entrepreneurship & e-business development for women. Thailand: Author.

  Cited by:
     None...