Philippine domestic prices of rice are significantly higher than world prices for similar rice quality. The WTO-approved Philippine rice waiver, which allows the government to continue its quantitative restrictions on rice imports, sustains the price gap in rice and prolongs the heavy burden on poor consumers who spend a significant amount of their income on rice. The results of rice policy simulations using a CGE model with poverty microsimulation indicate that a tariffication of the quantitative restrictions on rice imports, which maintains the level of protection to the local paddy farmers and the utilization of the generated revenue as cash transfers to targeted vulnerable groups, generates favorable income distribution and poverty reduction effects. Tighter quantitative restriction on rice imports under the rice self-sufficiency program increases the burden on poor households and generates perverse income redistribution from poor to rich.
Keywords: Philippines, Rice, Computable General Equilibrium, Rice TarifficationBriones, R. M. (2012). Should the Philippines tariff its quantitative restriction on rice? Philippine Institute for Development Studies (Policy Notes 2012-16). Place of publication: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Briones, R. M., & dela Pena, B. (2015). Competition reform in the Philippine rice sector. Philippine Institute for Development (Discussion Paper Series No. 2015-04). Place of publication: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Briones, R. M., and & Tolin, L. A. C. (2015). Options for supporting rice farmers under a post-QR regime: Review and assessment. Philippine Institute for Development (Discussion Paper Series No. 2015-46). Place of publication: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Cockburn, J. (2001). “Trade liberalization and poverty in Nepal: A computable general equilibrium micro simulation analysis”, [mimeo]., Place of publication: Department of Economics, Laval University.
Cororaton, C. B, Inocencio, A., Tiongco, M., Manalang, A., & Lamberte, A. E. (2018). Climate change, food availability, and poverty: The case of Philippine rice. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 28(1), pp. 70-–83.
Cororaton, C. B., Inocencio, A., Tiongco, M., and & Manalang, A. (2016). Assessing the potential economic and poverty effects of the national greening program. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 26(1),: 1-–38.
Cororaton, C. B. (2013). “Economic impact analysis of the reduction in sugar tariffs under the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement: The case of the Philippine sugar sector”. (Global Issues Initiative Working Paper No. 2013-1). Arlington, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, Virginia. Retrieved from (http://www.gii.ncr.vt.edu/docs/GII_WP2013-1.pdf)
Cororaton, C. B., and E.& Corong, E. (2009). Philippine agricultural and food policies: Implications on poverty and income distribution. (International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Research Report No. 161). Washington DC: IFPRI.
Cororaton, C. B., and J.& Cockburn, J. (2007). “Trade reform and poverty -– Lessons from the Philippines: A CGE-microsimulation analysis”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(1),: 141-–163.
Decaluwé, B., A. Patry, LA., Savard, L., and E.& Thorbecke, E. (2000). "Poverty analysis within a general equilibrium framework". (Working pPaper No. 9909)., Place of publication: Department of Economics, Laval University.
Foster, J.,ames; Joel Greer, J., and Erik& Thorbecke, E. (1984). "A class of decomposable poverty measures". Econometrica, . 52(3),: 761–766. doi:10.2307/1913475.
Ganuza, E., Barros, R., and & Vos, R. (2002). “Labor market adjustment, poverty and inequality during liberalization.’ Rob Vos, Lance Taylor, and & Ricardo Paes de Barros, R. (eEds.), Economic liberalization, distribution and poverty: Latin America in the 1990s (pp. 54–88). Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (US): Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 54-88.
Intal, P. S., Cu, L. F., and & Illescas, J. A. (2012). Rice prices and the National Food Authority. (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2012-27). Place of publication: Publisher.
Intal, P. S., and & Garcia, M. (2005). Rice and Philippine politics. (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2005-13). Place of publication: Publisher.
Jung, H., and E.& Thorbecke, E. (2001). “The impact of public education expenditure on human capital, growth, and poverty in Tanzania and Zambia: A general equilibrium approach”. International Monetary Fund. (IMF Working Paper WP/01/106). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/macroeconomics/modeling/IMMPA-html/Jung-Thorbecke01.pdf
Ponce, E., & Inocencio, A. B. (2018). Toward a more resilient and competitive Philippine rice industry: Lessons from the past three decades. Los Banos: International Rice Research Institute.
Rutherford, T. (2002). “Mixed complementarity programming with GAMS``. [Mimeo]. Retrieved from (http://pascal.iseg.utl.pt/~depeco/summerschool2008/P1-jedc1999.pdf)