Quantitative prediction of land cover and climate change impacts on hydrologic processes is widely used to develop sound watershed management strategies. However, not much is yet understood about the hydrologic behavior of watersheds in the Philippines in response to land cover change and climate variability. This study was designed to simulate the hydrologic responses of eight land cover and climate scenarios of Pagsanjan-Lumban Watershed (PLW) in Laguna, Quiaoit River Watershed (QRW) in Ilocos Norte, and Saug Watershed (SW) in Davao del Norte through the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Streamflow was then used to calibrate and validate the model using SUFI-2 algorithm in SWATCUP. The calibration exhibited a good match between observed and simulated streamflow for PLW (R2 = 0.72, NS = 0.69), QRW (R2 = 0.67, NS = 0.62), and SW (R2 = 0.78 NS = 0.77). Simulation results showed that (i) increased (decreased) precipitation in the areas also increased (decreased) water yield, surface runoff, and baseflow; (ii) the moderate shift to forest within the watershed moderately decreased runoff volume and increased evapotranspiration, which consequently decreased baseflow; (iii) urbanization resulted in lower baseflow but higher evapotranspiration; and (iv) presence of forest vegetation is associated with high infiltration and recharge; thus, lower surface runoff with higher baseflow. Hydrologic behavior, therefore, changes as it responds to changes in land cover and climate. Thus, appropriate interventions are vital to attain water security and sustainability in the watersheds.
Keywords: Hydrologic response, Land use/cover Change, Climate Change SWAT model, SWATCUP, sTREAMFLOWAbbaspour, K. C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bogner, K., Mieleitner, J., .Srinivasan, R. (2007). Modeling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/ alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333(24), 413–-430.
Alibuyog, N. R., & Pastor, F. C. (2009). Predicting the hydrologic response of the Laoag River basin to climate change using the SWAT Model. ILAARRDEC, 109–-119.
Alibuyog, N. R., Ella, V. B., Reyes, M. R., Srinivasan, R., Heatwole, C., & Dillaha, T. (2009). Predicting the effects of land use change on runoff and sediment yield in the Manupali River Subwatersheds using the SWAT model. International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 18(1-2), 15–-25.
Arnold, J. G., Moriasi, D. N., Gassman, P. W., Abbaspour, K. C., White, M. J., Srinivasan, R., . . . Jha, M. K. (2012). SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, x, 3-9.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R. S., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment; Part I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1), 73–-89.
Baker, T. J., & Miller, S. N. (2013). Using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 486(April), 100–-111.
Briones, R. U., Ella, V. B., & Bantayan, N. C. (2016). Hydrologic impact evaluation of land use and land cover change in Palico Watershed, Batangas, Philippines using the SWAT Model. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 19(1), 96–-107.
Brooks, K. N., Ffolliott, P. F., Gregersen, H. M., & Thames, J. L. (1991). Hydrology and the management of watersheds. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
Chen, Y. N., Takeuchi, K., Xu, C. H., Chen, Y. P., & Xu, Z. X. (2006). Regional climate change and its effects on river runoff in the Tarim Basin, China. Hydrological Processes, 20, 2207– 2216. doi:10.1002/hyp.6200
Di Luzio, M., Srinivasan, R., & And Arnold, J. G. (2004). A GIS-coupled hydrological model system for the watershed assessment of agricultural nonpoint and point sources of pollution. Transactions in GIS, 8, 113–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2004.00170.x
Fan, M., & Shibata, H. (2015). Simulation of watershed hydrology and stream water quality under land use and climate change scenarios in Teshio River watershed, Northern Japan. Ecological Indicators, 50, 79–-89.
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007). The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE , 50(4), 1211–1250. doi:10.13031/2013.23637
Getachew, H. E., & Melesse, A. M. (2012). The impact of land use change on the hydrology of the Angereb watershed, Ethiopia. International Journal of Water Sciences, 1, 1–-7. doi:10.5772/56266
Gosain, A. K., Rao, S., & Basuray, D. (2006). Climate change impact assessment on hydrology of Indian river basins. Current Science, 90(3), xxx–xxx.
Guo, H., Hu, Q., & Jiang, T. (2008). Annual and seasonal streamflow response to climate and land-cover changes in the Poyang Lake basin, China. Journal of Hydrology, 355, 106–122. doi:10-1016/j.jhydrol.2008-03-020.
Hjelmfelt, A. T. (1991). Investigation of curve number procedure. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 17(6), 725–735.
Jha, M. K., Pan, Z., Takle, E. S., & Gu, R. R. (2004). Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the upper Mississippi River basin:; aA regional climate change model perspective. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, D09102. doi:10.1029/2003JD003686
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Mata, L. J., Arnell, N. W., Döo¨ll, P., Kabat, P., Jimée´nez, B., . . . Shiklomanov, I. A. (2007). Freshwater resources and their management. In:(Eds. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 73–-210). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lahmer, W., Pfiitzner, B., & Becker, A. (2001). Assessment of land use and climate change impacts on the mesoscale. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, B(26), 565–575.
Leopold, L. B. (1968). Hydrology for urban land planning: A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. Washington: United States Geological Survey.
Luo, P., Takara, K., He, B., Cao, W., Yamashiki, Y., & Nover, D. (2011). Calibration and uncertainty analysis of SWAT model in a Japanese river catchment. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 67(4), 61–-66.
Miller, S. N., Kepner, W. G., Mehaffey, M. H., Hemandez, M., Miller, R. C., Goodrich, D. C., . . . Miller, W. P. (2002). Integrating landscape assessment and hydrological modeling for land cover change analysis. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 38(4), 915–929. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05534.x
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I - A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 282–-290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., & Williams, J. R. (2011a). Soil and water assessment tool input/output file documentation: Version 2009. College Station (Texas): Texas A&M University System.
Nie, W., Yuan, Y., Kepner, W., Nash, M. S., Jackson, M., & Erickson, C. (2011). Assessing impacts of landuse and landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 407(1), 105–114. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.012
Prasanchum, H., & Kangrang, A. (2017). Analysis of climate and land use changes impact on runoff characteristics for multi-purpose reservoir systems. JICA.
Price, K. (2011). Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on baseflow hydrology in humid regions: A review. Progress in Physical Geography, 335(4), 465–492. doi:10.1177/0309133311402714
Rathjens, H., & Oppelt, N. (2012). SWAT model calibration of a grid-based setup. Advances in Geosciences, 32, 55–-61. doi:10.5194/adgeo-32-55-2012
Rees, H. G., & Collins, D. N. (2006). Regional differences in response of flow in glacier-fed Himalayan rivers to climatic warming. Hydrological Processes, 20, 2157–2169. doi:10.1002/hyp.6209
Schwab, G. O., Fangmeier, D. D., Elliot, W. J., & Frevert, R. K. (1993). Soil and water conservation engineering (Fourth Edition 4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Srinivasan, R., Zhang, X., & Arnold, J. G. (2010). SWAT Uungauged: Hydrological budget and crop yield predictions in the upper Mississippi River basin. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 53(5), 1533–1546.
Tao, C., Chen, X. L., Lu, J. Z., Gassman, P. W., & José-Miguel, S. P. (2015). Assessing impacts of different land use scenarios on water budget of Fuhe River, China using SWAT model. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 8(3), 95－109. doi:10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.1132
Tarasova, L., Knoche, M., Dietrich, J., & Merz, R. (2016). Effects of input discretization, model complexity, and calibration strategy on model performance in a data-scarce glacierized catchment in Central Asia. Water Resources Research, 52, 4674–4699. doi:doi:10.1002/2015WR018551
van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., & Srinisvasan, R. (2006). A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. Journal of Hydrology, 32(1-4), 10–-23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008
Zhou, F., Xu, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, C. Y., Gao, Y., & Du, J. (2013). Hydrological response to urbanization at different spatio-temporal scales simulated by coupling of CLUE-S and the SWAT model in the Yangtze River Delta region. Journal of Hydrology, 485, 113–125. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.040