Korean teachers have been encouraged to use curriculum guides for subject matter when they develop lesson plans because curriculum guides help teachers adapt to students’ needs and local characteristics. To examine the current degree to which Korean middle school teachers pay attention to curriculum guides and textbooks as well as local characteristics and students’ needs, a survey was conducted of 1,010 middle school teachers in South Korea. The results indicated that the teachers still paid considerable attention to textbooks and students’ needs but paid little attention to curriculum guides and local characteristics. Teachers’ beliefs about curriculum materials, their knowledge, and their collaboration with peer teachers significantly influenced their attention to curriculum materials. In addition, teachers’ attention to curriculum guides and collaboration with peer teachers were significant factors in teachers’ attention to local characteristics and students’ needs. To encourage teachers to teach curriculum guides instead of textbooks, it is necessary to provide teachers with learning opportunities through collaboration with peer teachers.
Keywords: Curriculum guides Textbooks Student contexts Curriculum guide-based curriculum Lesson planningChung, J. Y. (2008). A study of an autonomous school policy: Rising issues and tasks for success. The Journal of Educational Administration, 26(2), 415–435.
Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California. CPRE Policy Brief (No. RB-23). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Donnelly, L. A., & Boone, W. J. (2007). Biology teachers’ attitudes toward and use of Indiana’s evolution standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 236–257.
Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.
Floden, R. E., Porter, A. C., Schmidt, W. H., Freeman, D. J., & Schwille, W. H. (1981). Response to curriculum pressures: A policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 129–141.
Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403–421.
Hong, H.-J. (2006). Paradigm shift in curriculum development and quality control of Korean national curriculum standards. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 183–206.
Kim, J. W. (2004). Education reform policies and classroom teaching in South Korea. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 14(2), 125–145.
Kim, S. (1997). The nature of ‘Curriculum 2000’ in consideration of our school curriculum after the rehabilitation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(2), 171–198.
Knapp, M. S. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27, 109–157.
Lee, B.-H., & Hong, H.-J. (2008). A critical review of the structure of Korea’s subject matters curriculum documents. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(1), 27–58.
Park, C. (2003). A study on the rights for the organization of the curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(1), 98–110.
Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform. A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.
Seo, K.-H. (2009). Teachers’ experiences of reconstructing national curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 159–189.
Shin, K.-H. (2009). American teachers’ autonomy in curriculum and its implications for Korean education. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 191–212.
Son, J.-W. (2008). Elementary teachers’ mathematics textbook use in terms of cognitive demands and influential factors: A mixed method study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing
Son, J.-W., & Choi, J. (2008). Elementary school teachers’ use of mathematics textbook: Cognitive demands and influential factors. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(3), 155–189.
Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 249–275.
Valencia, S. W., Place, N. A., Martin, S. D., & Grossman, P. L. (2006). Curriculum materials for elementary reading: Shackles and scaffolds for four beginning teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 93–120.