Work Ethics of the Proficient Teachers: Basis for a District Learning Action Cell (LAC) Plan

Article Details

Carlo Bryan C. Borrico, Seighart02@gmail.com, Holy Angel University
Corazon C. Borrico, , Alumni, Holy Angel University, Angeles City, Philippines
Leonardo C. Borrico, , Assistant Professor, Angeles University Foundation

Journal: Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal
Volume 7 Issue 1 (Published: 2020-08-28)

Abstract

It is critical for the teacher, as one of the most indispensable staff in the education system, to foster work ethics and to act as a role model to his/her students. Since there are many societal expectations on teacher, every teacher is directed to do what is right. This study determined the work ethics of the proficient teachers in the West District of the Schools Division of Angeles City. A crosssectional descriptive survey research design was used to describe the 124 proficient teachers with four to five years of teaching experience from the 12 schools in the said district. Most of the participants obtained very low scores on self reliance, leisure, and morality/ethics. This result indicates that most of them somewhat express that they strive for independence in their daily work and believe in the importance of non-work related activities. Since most of the participants got the lowest score on self reliance, leisure, and morality/ethics, the researchers developed a District LAC plan to fortify teachers’ low mean score on work ethics dimensions.

Keywords: Learning Action Cell (LAC) Plan; Proficient Teacher; Work Ethics

DOI: https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/apherj/article/view/1543/457
  References:

[1] Chan Chan, T., & Keow Ngang, T. (2015). The importance of ethics, moral and professional skills of novice teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 205, 8 – 12. http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.sbspro. 2015.09.004.

[2] Ghiatau, R. (2015). Ethical competence for teachers: A Possible Model. Symposion, 2, 3, 387–403

[3] Gunnel, C. (2006). Teacher ethics as a research problem: syntheses achieved and new issues. Teachers and Teaching, 12(3), 365-385, http://dx.doi.org:10.1080/13450600500467704

[4] Hutching, T. (2016). Protecting the professionprofessional ethics in the classroom. Real Clear Politics. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/s/proethica/pdf/real-clear-articles.pdf.

[5] Lumpkin, A. (2008). Teachers as role models teaching character and moral virtues. JOPERD, 79(2), 45-49

[6] Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. & Hudspeth, N. (2002). “The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory.” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 451-489.

[7] Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2012). Sharp focus on soft skills: a case study of Malaysian university students’ educational expectations. Education Research Policy Practice, 11, 207.

[8] Salleh, A. (2018). The role of Educational Institutes in promoting work ethics. International humanities studies, 5(1). Retreived from http://ihs-humanities.com/journals/vol5_no1_march2018/3.pdf.

[9] Turk, M., & Vignjevi?, B. (2016). Teachers’ work ethics: Croatian students’ perspective. Foro De Educación, 14(20), 489-514. http://dx.doi.org:10.14516/fde.2016.014.020.024

[10] Wormeli, R. (2006). Accountability: Teaching through assessment and feedback, not grading. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 14–27.

  Cited by:
     None...