The research article abstract is one of the most important sections of any journal article, but conventions on how it is written may vary in accordance with the contexts that surround them. This study analyzes the moves that occur among a corpus of 29 semi-randomly selected online research article abstracts taken from three Middle East and North Africa (MENA)-based journals in applied linguistics. Using Hyland’s (2000) Introduction-Purpose-Methods-Product-Conclusion (I-P-MPr-C) move structure as framework and as a result of the analysis of the corpora, it can be surmised that the Purpose (P), Method (M), and Product (Pr) moves are the most prevalent across the corpora of two of the three journals. In addition, only three abstracts out of 29 feature the complete and sequenced I-P-M-Pr-C structure that Hyland (2000) developed. These results suggest the following: Hyland’s move structure may be individually evident across the corpus, but it is not sequenced in the order that Hyland’s structure is originally presented. This study also posits the influence of journal-writing conventions, such as abstract lengths, on how writers compose their abstracts and thus results in the foregrounding of some moves (e.g., Purpose, Method, Product), the backgrounding of others (e.g., Introduction, Conclusion), and the existence of mixed moves. Lastly, implications for the teaching of writing and other directions of related research are provided.
Keywords: Journal articles, Middle East and North Africa (MENA), move analysis, research article abstractsArsyad, S. (2014). The discourse structure and linguistic features of research articles are abstracted in English by Indonesian academics. The Asian ESP Journal, 10(2), 191-223.
Basthomi, Y. (2006). The rhetoric of article abstracts: A sweep through the literature and a preliminary study. Bahasa dan Seni, 34(1), 174-190.
Belcher, W. (2009). Writing journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. London: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Bhatia, V.K. (1994). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman. Bhatia, V.K. (1997). Introduction: Genre analysis and World Englishes. World Englishes, 16(3), 313-319. Biber, B., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(23), 1-16.
Connor, U., Nagelhout, E., & Rozycki, W. (2008). Introduction. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout, & W. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric (pp. 1-8). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62, 428-446.
Darabad, A. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 125-140.
Ebrahimi, S., & Motlagh, H.S. (2017). A cross-disciplinary and linguistic study of context frames in research article abstracts. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(1), 81-95.
Fairclough, N. (2005). Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Peripheral Vision, 26(1), 915-939.
Fallatah, W. (2016). Features of Saudi English research articles abstracts. Arab World English Journal, 7(2), 368-379.
Fartousi, H., & Dumanig, F. (2012). A rhetorical analysis and contrastive rhetoric of selected conference abstracts. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(4), 514-519.
Ghasempour, B., & Farnia, M. (2017). Contrastive move analysis: Persian and English research article abstracts in law. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 5(4), 739-753.
Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2795-2809.
Huckin, T.N. (2001). Abstracting from abstracts. In M.H. (Ed.), Academic writing in context (pp. 93-102). Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
Hwang, C., Nguyen, T.-H., & Su, T.-J. (2017). Move analysis for scientific abstract sections: A study of nanoscience and nanotechnology research article abstracts. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(1), 19-22.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London, UK: Longman. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Pearson Educational Ltd. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2009a). Generic structure of research article abstracts in sciences. Journal of English Studies, 4, 95-111.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2009b). Writing research article abstracts in engineering: Linguistic perspective. International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Well-being (pp. 751-755). Khon Kaen, Thailand: Mahasarakham University.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). Generic characterisation of civil engineering research article abstracts. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3), 1-10.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Structural organization of research article abstracts: Civil and biomedical engineering. RMUTI Journal Special Issue, 1, 507-512.
Li, Y. (2011). Genre analysis of English and Chinese research article abstracts in linguistics and chemistry (Master’s thesis). San Diego State University, CA.
Lores, R. (2004). On research article abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280-302.
Melander, B., Swales, J., & Fredrickson, K.M. (1997). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities? In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and style of academic discourse (pp. 251-272). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paltridge, B., & Starfeld, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in second language: A handbook for supervisors. New York: Routledge.
Pho, P. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250.
Pho, P. (2009). An evaluation of three different approaches to the analysis of research article abstracts. Monash University Linguistics Papers, 11-16.
Safnil, A. (2000). Genre structure analyses of the Indonesian research articles (Doctoral dissertation). Australian National University: Canberra, Australia.
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introduction in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2),141-156.
Santos, M. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16, 481-499.
Sauperl, A., Klasinc, J., & Luzar, S. (2008). Components of abstracts: Logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1420-1432.
Suharno, S. (2001, July 15). Abstract for journal article. Retrieved from http://core.kmi. open.ac.uk/download/pdf/11703091.pdf
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J., Irwin, V., & Feak, C. (2009). Online commentary for abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Michigan: The University of Michigan.