Recent studies on text organization have focused mostly on business documents, academic texts, and certain newspaper articles such as editorials and news stories. However, the organization of opinion articles found in university-level newspapers has not been formally investigated. Therefore, this study attempts to determine whether these articles are written in accordance with journalistic writing principles. A total of 45 opinion articles were taken and served as the study corpus. These articles were analyzed based on Ho’s (2001) framework, as supported by the principles of macrostructure and the features of editorials in journalistic writing. The findings indicate that the discourse structure of Philippine newspaper opinion articles employs the two-move pattern in the orientation, exposition, and summation Elocks, Where two frequently used specific steps are found in each block. The findings suggest that university students adhere to a prescribed journalistic text organization, although there is also a tendency to deviate from it. Furthermore, it is possible that their judicious choices in using a particular step may have been influenced by the Writers’ objective of effectively communicating their opinion to a wide variety of readers
Keywords: Written discourse, opinion articles, macrostructures, move analysis, campus journalismAnker, S. (2005). Real writing (3rd ed.).Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Arriola, J.A. (2002). Issues on English as a second language: The Philippine experience. Unitas: The Quarterly Scholarly Journal of the University of Santo Tomas, 75(2), 223-242.
Baker, J., Brizee, A., & Angeli, A. (2013). Argumentative essays. The Online Writing Lab of Purdue University. Retrieved from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/05.
Barrios, A. (2013). Organizational framework in editorials of two Philippine local newspapers. Philippine ESL Journal, 11, 86-114.
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: Key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briones, R. (2012). Move analysis of philosophy research article introductions published in the University of Santo Tomas. Philippine ESL Journal, 9, 56-75.
Brizee, A., & Tardiff, E. (2011). Tips and examples for writing thesis statements. Purdue University Online Writing Lab. Retrieved from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/545/01/.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for specific purposes, 18(1), 47-62.
Crismore, A., Markannen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71.
Cruz, C. (2003). Pampahayagang pangkampus sa bagong milenyo para sa mag aaral guro at tagapayo. Manila: Rex Bookstore.
Cruz, C. (2010). Campus journalism and school paper advising (2nd ed.). Manila, Philippines: Rex Bookstore, Inc.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113.
Dayag, D. (2005). Epistemic modality, concessiveness, and interpersonal meaning in L2 newspaper editorials. In D. Dayag, & J.S. Quakenbush (Eds.), Linguistics and language education in the Philippines and beyond: A Festschrift in honor of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
Dayag, D. (2009). Metadiscourse, argumentation, and Asian Englishes: A contrastive rhetoric approach. Manila: University of Santo Tomas Publishing House.
Duque, M. (2013). Discourse organization of argumentative speeches: Implications for teaching argumentative writing. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 1, 86-116.
Fernandez, D. (2011). Culture in the classroom. In A. Fernandez, D. Paez, & M. Paterno (Eds.), Best practices in language and literature teaching: Practical ideas for the classroom from The ACELT Journal and ACELT Forum (pp. 153-163). Quezon City, Philippines: Cornerstone of Arts and Sciences.
Freely, A., & Steinberg, D. (2000). Argumentation and debate: Thinking for reasoned decision making (10th ed.). Connecticut: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Gustilo, L. (2002). A contrastive analysis of American English and Philippine English news leads. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 53-66.
Hacker, D. (1999). A writer’s reference. (4th ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Ho, C. (2004). Discourse features and strategies in students’ argumentative writing at pre-university level. ACELT Journal, 8, 3-10.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London and New York: Continuum.
Juzwik, M., Curcic, S., Wolbers, K., Moxley, K., Dimling, L., & Shankland, R. (2006). Writing into the 21st century: An overview of research on writing from 1994 to 2004. Written Communication, 23(4), 451- 476. doi: 10.1177/0741088306291619.
Kelly, M., & Tomic, A. (2001). Editorial. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1(1), 1-5.
Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Le, E. (2004). Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 687-714.
Li, L., & Ge, G. (2009). Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985-2004). English for specific purposes (2), 93-104.
Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for specific purposes (3), 150-160.
Magistro, E. (2007). The multilingual classroom: New rhetorical frontiers in L2 writing. College Quarterly, 10(2), 1-12.
Magno, C. (2011). World Englishes: Implications for learning and teaching English. In S. Dita (Ed.), Trends in applied linguistics in the Philippines: A decade in retrospect. Pasig City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing Inc.
Malden, M. (2003). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Malinao, A. (2008). Journalism for Filipinos (3rd ed.). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: National Book Store Publishing.
Manlapaz, E. (2011). Revisiting student-centered pedagogy. In A. Fernandez, D. Paez, & M. Paterno (Eds.), Best practices in language and literature teaching: Practical ideas for the classroom from The ACELT Journal and ACELT Forum (pp. xvi-xxiii). Quezon City, Philippines: Cornerstone of Arts and Sciences.
Miller, R. (1989). The informed argument: A multidisciplinary reader and guide (2nd ed.). Orland, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Murray, D. (1972). Teach writing as a process not a product. In R. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and composition: A source for teachers and writers (pp. 89-92). Upper Montclair, New Jersey: Boyton J. Cook.
Myers, G. (2004). Matters of opinion: Talking about public issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nwogu, K. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English or pecic Purposes, 16(2), 119-138. Retrieved from ScienceDirect database.
Orillos, L. (2008). Language acquisition theories, principles, and research. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Open University.
Perfecto, M. (2011). A process-oriented approach to writing. A. Fernandez, D. Paez, & M. Paterno. (Eds.), Best practices in language and literature teaching: Practical ideas for the classroom from The ACELT Journal and ACELT Forum (pp. 104-120). Quezon City, Philippines: Cornerstone of Arts and Sciences.
Pinto dos Santos, V. (2002). Genre analysis of business letters of negotiation. English for specific purposes (2), 167-199. Retrieved from ScienceDirect database.
Ramirez, J. (1989). Philippine journalism handbook (3rd ed.). Manila: National Book Store Publishing.
Smith, M. (2005). Students as contrastive rhetoricians: Examining ESL student perceptions of L1 and L2 rhetorical conventions. Arizona Working Papers in SLAT, 12, 79-98.
Strevens, P. (1977). Orientations in the teaching of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tan, K. (2003). Constructing the argumentative essay. Successful Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cdtl.nus.edu.sg/success/sl29.htm.
Tarrayo, V., & Duque, M. (2011). Arguing in L2: Discourse structure and textual metadiscourse in Philippine newspaper editorials. imanagers journal on English language Teaching, 1(4), 11-24
University Writing Center. (2012). Arguments. Texas A&M University Writing Center. Retrieved from http://writingcenter.tamu.edu/Students/Handouts-Guides/Guides-(What-Are-You-Writing-)/Academic-Writing/Arguments.
van Dijk, T. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.