The study explores the Filipino, particularly Bikolano, participants’ management of their virtual conversation in an asynchronous online discussion forum, focusing on the deployment of politeness strategies. Anchored in Walther’s (1992) social information processing theory, the study uses Brown and Levinson’s (B&L) (1978, 1987) politeness theory as a theoretical lens. The five comment threads produced by 32 participants and used for data analysis were drawn from 166 comment threads posted from June to August 2012 in a Bikol-language social group site. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were utilized via frequency count and percentage and Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson’s (1974) conversational analysis (CA) model, respectively. Findings reveal that the Bikolano online interactants tended to blend positive and negative politeness strategies rather than deploy them in isolation. The study validates the applicability of B&L’s (1978, 1987) politeness theory in the Philippine context, affirming its universal elements while delineating certain linguistic and cultural nuances that make Filipino, specifically Bikol, politeness distinct by itself. In general, the computer-mediated interactions manifest the interlocutors’ flexibility to modality change and their successful deployment of politeness schemes to effectively manage their web-based communication. Implications for transnational education are also discussed as part of the conclusion.
Keywords: Social information processing theory, conversation analysis, politeness theory, computer-mediated communication, Filipino/Bikolano politeness strategiesAl-Shalawi, H.G. (2001). Politeness strategies in Saudi ESL computer-mediated communication. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(10), 3969B.
Anderson, J.F., Beard, F.K., & Walther, J. (2010). Turn-taking and the local management of conversation in a highly simultaneous computer-mediated communication system. Language@Internet, 7. Retrieved from www.languageatinternet.de, urn:nbn:de:0009-7-28048, ISSN 1860-2029.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bunz, U., & Campbell, S. (2002). Accommodating politeness indicators in personal electronic mail messages. A paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers’ 3rd Annual Conference in Maastricht, The Netherlands, October 13-16.
Burke, M., & Kraut, R. (2008). Mind your p’s and q’s: The impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities. CSCW’08, November 8-12, 2008, San Diego, California.
Carlo, J., & Yoo, Y. (2007). How may I help you? Politeness in computer-mediated and face-to-face reference transactions. Information and Organization, 17(4),193-231. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2007.05.002. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com.
Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.
De Luna, T.P. (2011). When Filipino tweeners speak…virtually. Revista de Administratie Publica si Politici Sociale, 2(7), 110-121.
Duthler, K.W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(6). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/duthler.html
Ermida, I. (2006). Linguistic mechanisms of power in nineteen eighty-four: Applying politeness theory to Orwell’s world. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 842-862.
Heyd, T. (2008). Email hoaxes: Form, function, genre ecology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects in the universal of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2/3), 223-248.
Jocano, F.L. (1999). Management by culture (Rev. ed). Quezon City: Punlad Research House. Kiyama, S., Tamaoka, K., & Takiura, M. (2012). Applicability of Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory to a non-western culture: Evidence from Japanese facework behavior. doi 10.1177/2158244012470116
Labor, J. (2009). Linguistic politeness between Filipino professors and American students in the University of the Philippines Los Baños during consultation sessions. University of the Philippines Los Baños Journal, 7(1), 91-105.
Labor, J., & de Guzman, A. (2011). A discourse analysis of linguistic (im)politeness and symbolic power among Filipino professoriate. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Language and Communication on December 15-16, 2011 in Bangkok Thailand. Retrieved from http://iclc.nida.ac.th/main/images/proceeding_iclc2011.pdf
Labucay, I. (2011). Internet use in the Philippines. A paper presented at the 2011 Annual Conference of the World Association for Public Opinion, 21-21 September 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Lakoff, R., & Ide, S. (2005). Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lobel, J.W. (2013). Philippine and North Bornean languages: Issues in description, subgrouping, and reconstruction (Doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai’i at Manoa. Retrieved from http://www.ling.hawaii.edu/graduate/Dissertations/JasonLobelFinal.pdf
MacCallion, M. (2007). In-groups and out-groups. Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Retrieved from http://www.sociologyencyclopedia.com/public.
Matsumoto, Y. (1993). Linguistic politeness and cultural style: Observation from Japanese. In P.M. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 55-67). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Muniandy, A. (2002). Electronic-discourse (E-discourse): Spoken, written or a new hybrid? Prospect, 17(3), 45-68.
Nielsen Holdings. (2012). State of the media: The social media report. Retrieved on August 10, 2013 from www.nielsen.com.
O’Brien, J.J. (Ed.) (1993). The historical and cultural heritage of the Bikol people (3rd ed.). Naga City: Ateneo de Naga University Press.
Okdie, B.M., Guadagno, R.E., Bernieri, F.J., Geers, A.L., & Mclarney-Vesotski, A.R. (2011). Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 153-159. Olazo, J.M. (2012). Bikol politeness and face: A discourse analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Partido State University. Goa, Camarines Sur.
Pariera, K. (2006). The use of politeness strategies in email discussions about taboo topics. Portland State University McNair Scholars Online Journal, 2(1), 320-341. Retrieved from http:// http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/mcnair.
Pinker, S. (2007). The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(4), 437–461. doi 10.1515/IP.2007.023 1612-295X/07/0004–0437
Rao, M. (2012). Mobile Southeast Asia report 2012: Crossroads of innovation. Retrieved from www.mobilemonday.net.
Realubit, L.F. (1983). Bikols of the Philippines. Naga City: AMS Press.
Regala-Flores, E. (2008). Politeness in face-to-face interaction: An exploratory study. RASK, 28, 77-90. Roberts, J. (1992). Face threatening acts and politeness theory: Contrasting speeches from supervisory conferences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(3), 287-301.
Rosenthal, R. (1996). More than words: Linguistic and non-linguistic politeness in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 996-1011.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
Shigemitsu, Y. (2003). Politeness strategies in the context of argument in Japanese debate shows. Academic Reports Faculty English Tokyo University, 26(2), 26-35.
Simmons, T. (1994). Politeness theory in computer-mediated communication: Face-threatening acts in a “faceless” medium (Master’s thesis). Ashton University, Birmingham, England. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED381005
Sing Ting Cheung, C. (2009). Politeness strategies among Chinese and American speakers. LCOM Papers, 45-54.
Suarez, E. (2012). A pragmatic analysis of politeness in emails in the workplace. A paper presented at the 3rd TESOL Conference in Danang City, Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www/vnseameo.org/TESOLConference2012.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London, UK: Sage Publication.
Victoria, M. (2012). A discourse analytic study of power as caring relations in Philippine university classrooms. In C. Rogers & S. Weller (Eds.), Critical approaches to care: Understanding caring relations, identities and cultures (pp. 54 – 66). London: Routledge. Retrieved from www.academia.edu/attachments/29694956/download_file
Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
Walther, J.B. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(1): 36–65. doi:10.1177/0261927X04273036
Walther, J.B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557. Walther, J., & Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in in computer-mediated communication and relationships. Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed.), 529-563.
Yap, F.A. (2010). Global Filipino in multilingual education. Retrieved from http://www.kwf.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Yap-Global-Filipino-in Multilingual.pdf