Anchored on the Natural Order Hypothesis (NOH) (Krashen, 1981), this paper examines the accuracy/acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes by Filipino university freshman multilinguals and the influences of the ease (or difficulty) in acquisition. The participants were determined through purposive sampling, and their language samples, which were produced through prompts, were analyzed. Brown’s (1973) 90% norm for accuracy and Suppliance in Obligatory Contexts (SOC) procedure, following Ellis and Barkhuizen (2005), were employed in analyzing 585 sentences. For the overuse of morphemes, the Target-like Use Analysis (Pica, 1984) was used. Based on the Group Method Score (GMS), the following acquisition order was drawn: (1) Auxiliary ‘be’ (is); (2) Article ‘the’; (3) Progressive (-ing); (4) Plural (-s); (5) Copula ‘be’ (is); (6) Irregular past; (7) Possessive (-‘s), and (8) Third Person Singular Present. Te results counter the NOH for Auxiliary ‘be’ (is), Article ‘the,’ Progressive (-ing), and Copula ‘be’ (is) while affirming that the Irregular Past, Possessive (-‘s), and Third Person Singular Present tend to be acquired late. Moreover, L1 transfer appears to be the chief determinant of accuracy/ acquisition order while the frequency of language input and the use of cognitive strategies, such as overgeneralization, simplification, and incomplete application of rules may have affected the ease (or difficulty) in acquisition.
Keywords: Multilingual, grammatical morphemes, accuracy level, acquisition order, interlanguageBailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S.D. (1974). Is there a natural sequence in adult second language
learning? Language Learning, 21(2), 235-243.
Barrot, J. (2010). An accuracy order of selected grammatical morphemes in the monitored language written compositions of Filipino adult language learners. Philippine ESL Journal, 4, 45-65.
Behjat, F., & Sadighi, F. (2011). Te acquisition of English grammatical morphemes: A case of Iranian EFL
learners. MJAL, 3(2), 105-123.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2008). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd
ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Chimombo, M. (1979). An analysis of the order of acquisition of English grammatical morphemes in a
bilingual child. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 18, Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education.
Cook, V. (1993). Linguistics and second language acquisition. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corder, S.P. (1974). The significance of learners` errors. In J.C. Richards (Ed.). Error analysis. London:
Longman.
de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 2(3), 267-278.
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child language acquisition. Language Learning, 27,
245-258.
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldschneider, J.M., & Dekeyser, R.M. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition”
in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1-50.
Hakuta, K. (1974). A preliminary report on the development of grammatical morphemes in a Japanese
A girl learning English as a second language. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 3, Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Izumi, E., & Isahara, H. (2004). Investigation into language learners’ acquisition order based on an error
analysis of a learner corpus. An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning, 63-67.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Kwon, E.Y. (2005). The natural order of morpheme acquisition: A historical survey and discussion of
three putative determinants. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers inTESOL
& Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 1-21.
Larsen-Freeman, D.E. (1975). Te acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students.TESOL
Quarterly, 9(4), 409-419.
Logmao, C. (1989). Causes of errors committed by fourth-year secondary students of the Marinduque
Institute of Science and Technology. Unpublished Master`s Thesis, UST.
Luk, Z.P., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1
knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of Plural -s, Articles, and Possessive ‘s. Language
Learning, 59(4), 721-754.
Mendiola, C. (2005). The Filipino as a second language learner. The Normal Lights, 1(2), 158-191.
Onaha, H. (1992). Acquisition of English grammatical morphemes: A case of a local employee in the U.S.
military base in Okinawa, Japan. Ryudai Review of Language & Literature, 37, 147-156.
Paradis, J. (2005). Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with specific language impairment. American-Speech-Language-Hearing
Association, 36, 172-178.
Pica, T. (1984). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure.
Language Learning, 33(4), 465-497.
Polkinghorne, D.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 5 2 (2), 137-145.
Ramos, T. V. (1979). Studies in Filipino second language acquisition. Paper Presented at the First Summer Institute of Educational Research on Asians Americans. Asian American Bilingual Center
at the University of California, Berkeley.
Richards, J.C. (1975). Error analysis and second language strategies. In J.W. Oller & J.C. Richards (Eds.)
Focus on the learner. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
Schacter, P., & Otanes, F.T. (1972). Tagalog reference grammar. USA: University of California Press.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10 , 209-231.
Stern, P.N. (1980). Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. Image, 20 -23.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing
grounded theory (2nd ed.). USA: Sage Publications Inc.
Tingstad, K.R. (1999). e acquisition of time reference by Norwegian school learners of English. Unpublished thesis, University of Tromso.
Wae Minn, G.T., & Ching Hui, K. (2000). An investigation in the order and rate of morpheme acquisition by Singaporean Chinese children. Teaching & Learning, 2 1(1), 53-69.
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widiatmoko, P. (2008). Grammatical morpheme acquisition: An analysis of an EFL learner’s language samples. Jurnal Sastra Inggris, 8 (1), 22-37.
Wode, H. (1981). Learning a second language. An integrated view of language acquisition. Germany: Narr.