This paper examines the discourse organization of argumentative speeches of the debaters of Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU). A total of 20 constructive speeches were used as sources of data for this study. These speeches were taken from the following debate programs: ANC Square Of: Te Philippine Debate Championships; ANC Square Of: Te AUDC; and ANC Frank-ahan: The Drilon Debates. Frequency and percentage distributions were used to determine the discourse organization found in the argumentative speeches. Findings revealed that The debaters use two-move patterns in the orientation, exposition, and summation blocks of their speeches, namely, “orientation” and “focusing,” “inquiry” and “response,” and “rounding of” and “final stance,” respectively. This study offers a more detailed explanation on how argumentative essays may be structured through studying spoken discourse. Thus, student writers may benefit from a more specific instruction in the discrete elements of an argument, including how to formulate an effective claim, how to support a claim with evidence effectively, and how to reach the requirements of the argumentative genre.
Keywords: Discourse organization, argumentative speech, debate, argumentative writing, moves and steps in writingBauzon, P. (2004). Handbook in public speaking, argumentation and debate. National Bookstore: Manila.
Elizabeth, M. (2003). Painless speaking. Canada: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.
Flynn, C. (2006). Roles in debate. The World Debate Website. Retrieved from http://www.debating.net/flynn/foles.htmHo,
C.M.L. (2004). Discourse features and strategies in students’ argumentative writing at pre-University level.
ACELT Journal, 8, 3-10.
Hubert, M.D. (2011). The speaking-writing connection: Integrating dialogue into a foreign language writing course. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8 (2), 170-183. Retrieved frome-flt.nus.edu.sg/v8n22011/Hubert.pdf
Hyland, K. (2008). Small bits of textual material: A discourse analysis of Swales’ writing. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 143-160.
Phipps, K., Tucker, E., & Tucker, W. (n.d.). Teaching argumentation & debate: An educator’s activities manual. Retrieved from http://www.stlouisurbandebate.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Activities-Manual.pdf
Regala-Flores, E. (2007). inking skills reflected in argumentative essays of freshmen [sic] college stu-dents: A descriptive analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 16 (1), 33-43.
Sidaway, R. (2006). e genre-based approach to teaching writing. In English, Spring, 24-27.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Great Britain: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Wade, J.M., & Zorwick, L.W. (1999). Assigned advocacy, argumentation, and debate in high school class-rooms. Rostrum, 48, 1-3.