In this paper, we will problematize the proposed use of mother-tongue-based instruction in the Philippines. As a country that has, for almost a century, supported the use of English in schools, this proposal marks a drastic shift in Philippine languages in education policies. We argue that a century of language policies, which have privileged English over all the local languages of the Philippines, have led to specific attitudes to language that will impact on the success of mother-tongue-based education. To support our arguments, we will draw on the results of a survey on language attitudes conducted in the Philippines. This survey specifically asked respondents about what they perceived to be the role/s of English and other Philippine languages in education. We argue that although mother-tongue initiatives are admirable, they need to be examined in terms of attitudes to language, which may or may not value mother tongues. In addition, we argue that for mother-tongue-based education to succeed, it is necessary to consider the possibility of changing these attitudes to language via a principles-based approach to language policy.
Keywords: Mother-tongue-based multilingual education, Philippines, language attitudes, language affiliation, language allocationBernardo, A. (2004). McKinley’s questionable bequest: Over 100 years of English in Philippine education. World Englishes, 23(1), 17-31.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. UK and USA: Taylor Francis LTD.
Cooper, R. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gonzalez, A. (1981). Language policy and language-in-education-policy in the Philippines. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2,
Gonzales, A. (1998). The language planning situation in the Philippines. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 19(5), 487-525.
Gonzalez, A. (2004). The social dimensions of Philippine English. World Englishes, 2 3(1), 7-16. Gunigundo, M. (2010). The right to learn in one’s language. In R.M.D. Nolasco, F.A Datar, & A.M Azurin (Eds), Starting where the children are: A collection of essays on mother tongue based multilingual education and language issues in the Philippines (pp. 78-80). Quezon City: 170+ Talaytayan MLE.
Hasan, R. (1999). Speaking with reference to context. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics (pp. 219-329). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hidalgo, C. (1998). Language choice in a multilingual society: The case of the Philippines.
International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 130, 23-33.
Lockwood, J., Forey, G., & Price, H. (2009). English in Philippine call centers and BPO operations: Is-sues, opportunities, and research. In In L. Bautista, & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English:Linguistic and literary perspectives
(Phil. ed) (pp. 219-241). Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.Lorente, B.P. (forthcoming). The grip of English and Philippine language policy. In L.H.A. Wee, L. Lim,& R.B.H. Goh (Eds.),
The politics of English in Asia: Language policy and cultural expression in South and Southeast Asia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mahboob, A. (2011, June 17). On the politics of language. Weekly L’express, p. 3.
Mahboob, A., & ilakaratna, N. (2012). A principles-based approach for English language teaching policies and practices. Alexandria: ESOL Publications.
Martin, I. (1999). Language and institution: Roots of bilingualism in the Philippines. In L. Bautista,& G. an (Eds.), The Filipino bilingual: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 132-136). Ma-nila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
Martin, I. (2009). Colonial education and the shaping of Philippine literature in English. In L. Bautista,& K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (Phil. ed) (pp. 245-259). Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.
Martin, I. (2010). Fearing English in the Philippines. In R.M.D. Nolasco, F.A Datar, & A.M Azurin (Eds), Starting where the children are: A collection of essays on mother tongue base multilingual ed-ucation and language issues in the Philippines (pp. 125-127). Quezon City: 170+Malaytayan MLE.
Martin, I. (2012). Expanding the role of Philippine languages in the legal system: Te dim prospects. Asian Perspectives in the Arts and Humanities, 2(1), 1-14.
Martin, J. (1997). Linguistics and the consumer: The practice of theory. Linguistics and Education, 9 (4),411-448.Martin, J. (2010). Semantic variation-Modelling realization, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation (pp. 1-34). London, United Kingdom: Continuum Press.
Nolasco, R. (2008). The prospects of multilingual education and literacy in the Philippines. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Development, Language Revitalization and Multi- lingual Education in Ethnolinguistic Communities. Bangkok, Thailand.
Norton, B. (2010). Language and identity. In N. Hornberger, & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 349-369). Bristol, Buffalo, and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Ricento, . (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal ofSociolinguistics, 4(2), 196-213.
olleson, J. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality . UK: Longman Group.
upas, .R.F. (2001). Linguistic imperialism in the Philippines: Reflections of an English language teacher Filipino overseas workers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 10 (1), 1-40.
upas, .R.F. (2009). World Englishes or worlds of English? Pitfalls of postcolonial discourse in Philippine English In L. Bautista, & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary per-spectives (Phil. ed) (pp. 67-86). Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc